204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24572859)
1. Reinforcement of the abdominal wall following breast reconstruction with abdominal flaps: a comparison of synthetic and biological mesh.
Patel KM; Shuck J; Hung R; Hannan L; Nahabedian MY
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Mar; 133(3):700-707. PubMed ID: 24572859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bovine versus porcine acellular dermal matrix for complex abdominal wall reconstruction.
Clemens MW; Selber JC; Liu J; Adelman DM; Baumann DP; Garvey PB; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jan; 131(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 22965235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Outcomes of various techniques of abdominal fascia closure after TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Boehmler JH; Butler CE; Ensor J; Kronowitz SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2009 Mar; 123(3):773-781. PubMed ID: 19319039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating mesh use for abdominal donor site closure after deep inferior epigastric perforator flap breast reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Parmeshwar N; Lem M; Dugan CL; Piper M
Microsurgery; 2023 Nov; 43(8):855-864. PubMed ID: 37697962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Primary fascial closure with biologic mesh reinforcement results in lesser complication and recurrence rates than bridged biologic mesh repair for abdominal wall reconstruction: A propensity score analysis.
Giordano S; Garvey PB; Baumann DP; Liu J; Butler CE
Surgery; 2017 Feb; 161(2):499-508. PubMed ID: 27810091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.
Chang EI; Chang EI; Soto-Miranda MA; Zhang H; Nosrati N; Robb GL; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1383-1391. PubMed ID: 24005365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Abdominal weakness, bulge, or hernia after DIEP flaps: An algorithm of management, prevention, and surgical repair with classification.
Haddock NT; Culver AJ; Teotia SS
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2021 Sep; 74(9):2194-2201. PubMed ID: 33487570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Complications of acellular dermal matrices in abdominal wall reconstruction.
Patel KM; Bhanot P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2012 Nov; 130(5 Suppl 2):216S-224S. PubMed ID: 23096976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does mesh location matter in abdominal wall reconstruction? A systematic review of the literature and a summary of recommendations.
Albino FP; Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Sosin M; Attinger CE; Bhanot P
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Nov; 132(5):1295-1304. PubMed ID: 24165612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Indications and outcomes following complex abdominal reconstruction with component separation combined with porcine acellular dermal matrix reinforcement.
Patel KM; Nahabedian MY; Gatti M; Bhanot P
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):394-8. PubMed ID: 22156887
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Patient-Reported Abdominal Morbidity Following Abdomen-Based Breast Reconstruction.
Maus J; Pestana IA
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2024 Jun; 40(5):363-370. PubMed ID: 37884059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients.
Ascherman JA; Seruya M; Bartsich SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jan; 121(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18176197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Polypropylene and Bioabsorbable Mesh for Abdominal Wall Reinforcement following Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction.
Jordan SW; Schulz SA; Carraher AM; Cabiling DS
J Reconstr Microsurg; 2019 Jun; 35(5):335-340. PubMed ID: 30557896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Initial experience with the use of porcine acellular dermal matrix (Strattice) for abdominal wall reinforcement after transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
Cicilioni O; Araujo G; Mimbs N; Cox MD
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Mar; 68(3):265-70. PubMed ID: 21862920
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Current options in the management of complex abdominal wall defects.
Ghazi B; Deigni O; Yezhelyev M; Losken A
Ann Plast Surg; 2011 May; 66(5):488-92. PubMed ID: 21372667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Phasix, polypropylene, and primary closure of the abdominal donor site after bilateral free flap breast reconstruction: Long-term evaluation of abdominal hernia and bulge formation.
Yu D; Patel AT; Rossi K; Topham NS; Chang EI
Microsurgery; 2020 May; 40(4):434-439. PubMed ID: 31815314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Impact of Mesh Reinforcement with Components Separation for Abdominal Wall Reconstruction.
Razavi SA; Desai KA; Hart AM; Thompson PW; Losken A
Am Surg; 2018 Jun; 84(6):959-962. PubMed ID: 29981631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Divulge the bulge: an international survey of abdominal donor site morbidity in free autologous breast reconstruction.
Christie B; Shulzhenko NO; Poore SO; Afifi AM
J Plast Surg Hand Surg; 2019 Oct; 53(5):265-270. PubMed ID: 31012787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The management of abdominal contour defects following TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Pinell-White XA; Kapadia SM; Losken A
Aesthet Surg J; 2014 Feb; 34(2):264-71. PubMed ID: 24345798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
