BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24574114)

  • 1. Optimization of gene set annotations via entropy minimization over variable clusters (EMVC).
    Frost HR; Moore JH
    Bioinformatics; 2014 Jun; 30(12):1698-706. PubMed ID: 24574114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Optimizing gene set annotations combining GO structure and gene expression data.
    Wang D; Li J; Liu R; Wang Y
    BMC Syst Biol; 2018 Dec; 12(Suppl 9):133. PubMed ID: 30598093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interactively optimizing signal-to-noise ratios in expression profiling: project-specific algorithm selection and detection p-value weighting in Affymetrix microarrays.
    Seo J; Bakay M; Chen YW; Hilmer S; Shneiderman B; Hoffman EP
    Bioinformatics; 2004 Nov; 20(16):2534-44. PubMed ID: 15117752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Annotation concept synthesis and enrichment analysis: a logic-based approach to the interpretation of high-throughput experiments.
    Jiline M; Matwin S; Turcotte M
    Bioinformatics; 2011 Sep; 27(17):2391-8. PubMed ID: 21743060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spectral gene set enrichment (SGSE).
    Frost HR; Li Z; Moore JH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Mar; 16():70. PubMed ID: 25879888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Optimization of Gene Set Annotations Using Robust Trace-Norm Multitask Learning.
    Liang X; Zhu L; Huang DS
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2018; 15(3):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 28391202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing gene annotation enrichment tools for functional modeling of agricultural microarray data.
    van den Berg BH; Thanthiriwatte C; Manda P; Bridges SM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Oct; 10 Suppl 11(Suppl 11):S9. PubMed ID: 19811693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Weighted rank aggregation of cluster validation measures: a Monte Carlo cross-entropy approach.
    Pihur V; Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2007 Jul; 23(13):1607-15. PubMed ID: 17483500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistical Test of Expression Pattern (STEPath): a new strategy to integrate gene expression data with genomic information in individual and meta-analysis studies.
    Martini P; Risso D; Sales G; Romualdi C; Lanfranchi G; Cagnin S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Apr; 12():92. PubMed ID: 21481242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combining Pareto-optimal clusters using supervised learning for identifying co-expressed genes.
    Maulik U; Mukhopadhyay A; Bandyopadhyay S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():27. PubMed ID: 19154590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. ADGO 2.0: interpreting microarray data and list of genes using composite annotations.
    Chi SM; Kim J; Kim SY; Nam D
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2011 Jul; 39(Web Server issue):W302-6. PubMed ID: 21624890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MILANO--custom annotation of microarray results using automatic literature searches.
    Rubinstein R; Simon I
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Jan; 6():12. PubMed ID: 15661078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of GO annotations in Correspondence Analysis: facilitating the interpretation of microarray data.
    Busold CH; Winter S; Hauser N; Bauer A; Dippon J; Hoheisel JD; Fellenberg K
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(10):2424-9. PubMed ID: 15746280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. BACA: bubble chArt to compare annotations.
    Fortino V; Alenius H; Greco D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):37. PubMed ID: 25652236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. BubbleGUM: automatic extraction of phenotype molecular signatures and comprehensive visualization of multiple Gene Set Enrichment Analyses.
    Spinelli L; Carpentier S; MontaƱana Sanchis F; Dalod M; Vu Manh TP
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Oct; 16():814. PubMed ID: 26481321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Statistical approach for selection of biologically informative genes.
    Das S; Rai A; Mishra DC; Rai SN
    Gene; 2018 May; 655():71-83. PubMed ID: 29458166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Random forests-based differential analysis of gene sets for gene expression data.
    Hsueh HM; Zhou DW; Tsai CA
    Gene; 2013 Apr; 518(1):179-86. PubMed ID: 23219997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computational algorithms to predict Gene Ontology annotations.
    Pinoli P; Chicco D; Masseroli M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015; 16 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S4. PubMed ID: 25916950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. ADGO: analysis of differentially expressed gene sets using composite GO annotation.
    Nam D; Kim SB; Kim SK; Yang S; Kim SY; Chu IS
    Bioinformatics; 2006 Sep; 22(18):2249-53. PubMed ID: 16837524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An unsupervised hierarchical dynamic self-organizing approach to cancer class discovery and marker gene identification in microarray data.
    Hsu AL; Tang SL; Halgamuge SK
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Nov; 19(16):2131-40. PubMed ID: 14594719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.