225 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24574775)
1. Novel esophageal squamous cell carcinoma bone metastatic clone isolated by scintigraphy, X ray and micro PET/CT.
Zhao BZ; Cao J; Shao JC; Sun YB; Fan LM; Wu CY; Liang S; Guo BF; Yang G; Xie WH; Yang QC; Yang SF
World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Jan; 20(4):1030-7. PubMed ID: 24574775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Establishment of an experimental human lung adenocarcinoma cell line SPC-A-1BM with high bone metastases potency by (99m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy.
Yang S; Dong Q; Yao M; Shi M; Ye J; Zhao L; Su J; Gu W; Xie W; Wang K; Du Y; Li Y; Huang Y
Nucl Med Biol; 2009 Apr; 36(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 19324277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Establishment of a novel chinese human lung adenocarcinoma cell line CPA-Yang3 and its real bone metastasis clone CPA-Yang3BM in immunodeficient mice].
Yang S; Shi M; Cao J; Su J; Zhao L; Lei B; Chang C; Lu J; Ye J; Xie W
Zhongguo Fei Ai Za Zhi; 2011 Feb; 14(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 21342638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prospective study evaluating the relative sensitivity of 18F-NaF PET/CT for detecting skeletal metastases from renal cell carcinoma in comparison to multidetector CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scintigraphy, using an adaptive trial design.
Gerety EL; Lawrence EM; Wason J; Yan H; Hilborne S; Buscombe J; Cheow HK; Shaw AS; Bird N; Fife K; Heard S; Lomas DJ; Matakidou A; Soloviev D; Eisen T; Gallagher FA
Ann Oncol; 2015 Oct; 26(10):2113-8. PubMed ID: 26202597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of diagnostic ability between (99m)Tc-MDP bone scan and (18)F-FDG PET/CT for bone metastasis in patients with small cell lung cancer.
Lee JW; Lee SM; Lee HS; Kim YH; Bae WK
Ann Nucl Med; 2012 Oct; 26(8):627-33. PubMed ID: 22729551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between whole-body positron emission tomography and bone scintigraphy in evaluating bony metastases of esophageal carcinomas.
Kato H; Miyazaki T; Nakajima M; Takita J; Kimura H; Faried A; Sohda M; Fukai Y; Masuda N; Fukuchi M; Manda R; Ojima H; Tsukada K; Kuwano H; Oriuchi N; Endo K
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(6C):4439-44. PubMed ID: 16334123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of Bone Metastases between
Wang D; Yang Y; Zeng Z; Ye J; Guo C; Huang S; Guo X; Xiao J
Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2022; 2022():5975338. PubMed ID: 35494210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Discordant findings in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: absolutely normal bone scans versus disseminated bone metastases on positron-emission tomography/computed tomography.
Ak I; Sivrikoz MC; Entok E; Vardareli E
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2010 Apr; 37(4):792-6. PubMed ID: 20015657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of (99m)Tc MDP scintigraphy, (18)F NaF PET/CT, and (18)F FDG PET/CT for detection of skeletal metastases.
Iagaru A; Mittra E; Dick DW; Gambhir SS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2012 Apr; 14(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 21479710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the diagnostic and prognostic values of 99mTc-MDP-planar bone scintigraphy, 131I-SPECT/CT and 18F-FDG-PET/CT for the detection of bone metastases from differentiated thyroid cancer.
Qiu ZL; Xue YL; Song HJ; Luo QY
Nucl Med Commun; 2012 Dec; 33(12):1232-42. PubMed ID: 23111353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of bone metastases from breast cancer by bone scintigraphy and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging.
Pires AO; Borges US; Lopes-Costa PV; Gebrim LH; da Silva BB
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2014 Sep; 180():138-41. PubMed ID: 25037283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the diagnostic accuracy of 99 m-Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy and 18 F-FDG PET/CT for the detection of skeletal metastases.
Chang CY; Gill CM; Joseph Simeone F; Taneja AK; Huang AJ; Torriani M; Bredella MA
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jan; 57(1):58-65. PubMed ID: 25533313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The diagnostic and prognostic effectiveness of F-18 sodium fluoride PET-CT in detecting bone metastases for hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
Yen RF; Chen CY; Cheng MF; Wu YW; Shiau YC; Wu K; Hong RL; Yu CJ; Wang KL; Yang RS
Nucl Med Commun; 2010 Jul; 31(7):637-45. PubMed ID: 20389259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of (18)F-FDG PET/CT and (99 m)Tc-MDP bone scintigraphy for detection of bone metastasis in osteosarcoma.
Byun BH; Kong CB; Lim I; Kim BI; Choi CW; Song WS; Cho WH; Jeon DG; Koh JS; Lee SY; Lim SM
Skeletal Radiol; 2013 Dec; 42(12):1673-81. PubMed ID: 23995264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is 18F-FDG PET/CT more reliable than 99mTc-MDP planar bone scintigraphy in detecting bone metastasis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
Yang Z; Zhang Y; Shi W; Zhu B; Hu S; Yao Z; Pan H; Hu C; Zhang Y; Li D
Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jun; 28(5):411-6. PubMed ID: 24610681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of 18F fluoride PET/CT and 99mTc-MDP bone scan in the detection of skeletal metastases in urinary bladder carcinoma.
Chakraborty D; Bhattacharya A; Mete UK; Mittal BR
Clin Nucl Med; 2013 Aug; 38(8):616-21. PubMed ID: 23603596
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Patterns of nodal metastases on 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma are useful to guide treatment planning of radiotherapy.
Liu CJ; Cheng JC; Lee JM; Cheng MF; Tzen KY; Yen RF
Clin Nucl Med; 2015 May; 40(5):384-9. PubMed ID: 25674870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Imaging of Secreted Extracellular Periostin, an Important Marker of Invasion in the Tumor Microenvironment in Esophageal Cancer.
Heidari P; Esfahani SA; Turker NS; Wong G; Wang TC; Rustgi AK; Mahmood U
J Nucl Med; 2015 Aug; 56(8):1246-51. PubMed ID: 26069303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
Wei XF; Chen XK; Lu L; Luo P; Xu L; Xie HN; Yang YF; Yu YK; Li HM; Liu Q; Zhang RX; Qin JJ; Li Y
Thorac Cancer; 2022 Aug; 13(16):2371-2376. PubMed ID: 35811377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Combining CT and scintigraphy: SPECT-CT and PET-CT].
Vöö S; van Dongen TM; Waterval JJ; Willems P; Mottaghy F; Brans B
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2011; 155(36):A2792. PubMed ID: 21914229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
