These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24574907)

  • 21. RBFNDOB-based neural network inverse control for non-minimum phase MIMO system with disturbances.
    Li J; Li S; Chen X; Yang J
    ISA Trans; 2014 Jul; 53(4):983-93. PubMed ID: 24947431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fuzzy control of multivariable process by modified error decoupling.
    Saravanan S; Kher S
    ISA Trans; 2002 Oct; 41(4):437-44. PubMed ID: 12398275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Adaptive inverse control of neural spatiotemporal spike patterns with a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS) framework.
    Li L; Park IM; Brockmeier A; Chen B; Seth S; Francis JT; Sanchez JC; Príncipe JC
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2013 Jul; 21(4):532-43. PubMed ID: 22868633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive directional compensator for systems with input constraints.
    Haeri M; Aalam N
    ISA Trans; 2006 Jul; 45(3):393-405. PubMed ID: 16856635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cascade direct adaptive fuzzy control design for a nonlinear two-axis inverted-pendulum servomechanism.
    Wai RJ; Kuo MA; Lee JD
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2008 Apr; 38(2):439-54. PubMed ID: 18348926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An optimal interval type-2 fuzzy logic control based closed-loop drug administration to regulate the mean arterial blood pressure.
    Sharma R; Deepak KK; Gaur P; Joshi D
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Mar; 185():105167. PubMed ID: 31715333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Generalized predictor based active disturbance rejection control for non-minimum phase systems.
    Geng X; Hao S; Liu T; Zhong C
    ISA Trans; 2019 Apr; 87():34-45. PubMed ID: 30503271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Learning from ISS-modular adaptive NN control of nonlinear strict-feedback systems.
    Wang C; Wang M; Liu T; Hill DJ
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2012 Oct; 23(10):1539-50. PubMed ID: 24808000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Adaptive neural control for a class of nonlinearly parametric time-delay systems.
    Ho DW; Li J; Niu Y
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw; 2005 May; 16(3):625-35. PubMed ID: 15940992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Output feedback direct adaptive neural network control for uncertain SISO nonlinear systems using a fuzzy estimator of the control error.
    Chemachema M
    Neural Netw; 2012 Dec; 36():25-34. PubMed ID: 23037773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A fast converging robust controller using adaptive second order sliding mode.
    Mondal S; Mahanta C
    ISA Trans; 2012 Nov; 51(6):713-21. PubMed ID: 22898501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Predictive feedback control.
    Giovanini LL
    ISA Trans; 2003 Apr; 42(2):207-26. PubMed ID: 12708540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The Impact of Nonminimum-Phase Zeros on Human-in-the-Loop Control Systems.
    Zhang X; Seigler TM; Hoagg JB
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2022 Jun; 52(6):5098-5112. PubMed ID: 33151888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A simulation study of an inverse controller for closed- and semiclosed-loop control in type 1 diabetes.
    Rodríguez-Herrero A; Pérez-Gandía C; Rigla M; de Leiva A; Gómez EJ; Hernando ME
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2010 Feb; 12(2):95-104. PubMed ID: 20105038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Optimizing the learning rate for adaptive estimation of neural encoding models.
    Hsieh HL; Shanechi MM
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2018 May; 14(5):e1006168. PubMed ID: 29813069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Trajectory exponential tracking control of unmanned surface ships with external disturbance and system uncertainties.
    Qu Y; Xiao B; Fu Z; Yuan D
    ISA Trans; 2018 Jul; 78():47-55. PubMed ID: 29921420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Indirect adaptive output feedback control of a biorobotic AUV using pectoral-like mechanical fins.
    Naik MS; Singh SN; Mittal R
    Bioinspir Biomim; 2009 Jun; 4(2):026001. PubMed ID: 19276512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bias, optimal linear estimation, and the differences between open-loop simulation and closed-loop performance of spiking-based brain-computer interface algorithms.
    Chase SM; Schwartz AB; Kass RE
    Neural Netw; 2009 Nov; 22(9):1203-13. PubMed ID: 19502004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Unbiased identification of finite impulse response linear systems operating in closed-loop.
    Westwick DT; Perreault EJ
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():2118-21. PubMed ID: 17946938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Design and analysis of a model predictive controller for active queue management.
    Wang P; Chen H; Yang X; Ma Y
    ISA Trans; 2012 Jan; 51(1):120-31. PubMed ID: 21963108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.