These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

162 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24575122)

  • 21. De Novo Plant Transcriptome Assembly and Annotation Using Illumina RNA-Seq Reads.
    Kerr SC; Gaiti F; Tanurdzic M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 1933():265-275. PubMed ID: 30945191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. TransRate: reference-free quality assessment of de novo transcriptome assemblies.
    Smith-Unna R; Boursnell C; Patro R; Hibberd JM; Kelly S
    Genome Res; 2016 Aug; 26(8):1134-44. PubMed ID: 27252236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Selecting Superior De Novo Transcriptome Assemblies: Lessons Learned by Leveraging the Best Plant Genome.
    Honaas LA; Wafula EK; Wickett NJ; Der JP; Zhang Y; Edger PP; Altman NS; Pires JC; Leebens-Mack JH; dePamphilis CW
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(1):e0146062. PubMed ID: 26731733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparisons of de novo transcriptome assemblers in diploid and polyploid species using peanut (Arachis spp.) RNA-Seq data.
    Chopra R; Burow G; Farmer A; Mudge J; Simpson CE; Burow MD
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115055. PubMed ID: 25551607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combining transcriptome assemblies from multiple de novo assemblers in the allo-tetraploid plant Nicotiana benthamiana.
    Nakasugi K; Crowhurst R; Bally J; Waterhouse P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e91776. PubMed ID: 24614631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Informed kmer selection for de novo transcriptome assembly.
    Durai DA; Schulz MH
    Bioinformatics; 2016 Jun; 32(11):1670-7. PubMed ID: 27153653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Challenges and advances for transcriptome assembly in non-model species.
    Ungaro A; Pech N; Martin JF; McCairns RJS; Mévy JP; Chappaz R; Gilles A
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(9):e0185020. PubMed ID: 28931057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Benchmarking of de novo assembly algorithms for Nanopore data reveals optimal performance of OLC approaches.
    Cherukuri Y; Janga SC
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Aug; 17 Suppl 7(Suppl 7):507. PubMed ID: 27556636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. RNA-Seq Assembly - Are We There Yet?
    Schliesky S; Gowik U; Weber AP; Bräutigam A
    Front Plant Sci; 2012; 3():220. PubMed ID: 23056003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of De Novo Transcriptome Assemblers and k-mer Strategies Using the Killifish, Fundulus heteroclitus.
    Rana SB; Zadlock FJ; Zhang Z; Murphy WR; Bentivegna CS
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153104. PubMed ID: 27054874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluating de Bruijn graph assemblers on 454 transcriptomic data.
    Ren X; Liu T; Dong J; Sun L; Yang J; Zhu Y; Jin Q
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(12):e51188. PubMed ID: 23236450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comprehensive evaluation of de novo transcriptome assembly programs and their effects on differential gene expression analysis.
    Wang S; Gribskov M
    Bioinformatics; 2017 Feb; 33(3):327-333. PubMed ID: 28172640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. rnaSPAdes: a de novo transcriptome assembler and its application to RNA-Seq data.
    Bushmanova E; Antipov D; Lapidus A; Prjibelski AD
    Gigascience; 2019 Sep; 8(9):. PubMed ID: 31494669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of assembly algorithms for improving rate of metatranscriptomic functional annotation.
    Celaj A; Markle J; Danska J; Parkinson J
    Microbiome; 2014; 2():39. PubMed ID: 25411636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clover: a clustering-oriented de novo assembler for Illumina sequences.
    Hsieh MF; Lu CL; Tang CY
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Nov; 21(1):528. PubMed ID: 33203354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Optimal assembly strategies of transcriptome related to ploidies of eukaryotic organisms.
    He B; Zhao S; Chen Y; Cao Q; Wei C; Cheng X; Zhang Y
    BMC Genomics; 2015 Feb; 16(1):65. PubMed ID: 25759274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fragmentation and Coverage Variation in Viral Metagenome Assemblies, and Their Effect in Diversity Calculations.
    García-López R; Vázquez-Castellanos JF; Moya A
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2015; 3():141. PubMed ID: 26442255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SMRT sequencing only de novo assembly of the sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) chloroplast genome.
    Stadermann KB; Weisshaar B; Holtgräwe D
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Sep; 16(1):295. PubMed ID: 26377912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Illumina error correction near highly repetitive DNA regions improves de novo genome assembly.
    Heydari M; Miclotte G; Van de Peer Y; Fostier J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):298. PubMed ID: 31159722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comprehensive evaluation of RNA-seq analysis pipelines in diploid and polyploid species.
    Payá-Milans M; Olmstead JW; Nunez G; Rinehart TA; Staton M
    Gigascience; 2018 Dec; 7(12):. PubMed ID: 30418578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.