These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24575886)

  • 21. [Repeated measurement of memory with valenced test items: verbal memory, working memory and autobiographic memory].
    Kuffel A; Terfehr K; Uhlmann C; Schreiner J; Löwe B; Spitzer C; Wingenfeld K
    Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr; 2013 Jul; 81(7):390-7. PubMed ID: 23856944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Conscious recollection and binding among context features.
    Boywitt CD; Meiser T
    Conscious Cogn; 2013 Sep; 22(3):875-86. PubMed ID: 23792977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Working memory load in the initial learning phase facilitates relearning: a study of vocabulary learning.
    Sasaki T
    Percept Mot Skills; 2008 Feb; 106(1):317-27. PubMed ID: 18459381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A dissociation between implicit and explicit verbal memory in left temporal lobe epilepsy.
    Del Vecchio N; Liporace J; Nei M; Sperling M; Tracy J
    Epilepsia; 2004 Sep; 45(9):1124-33. PubMed ID: 15329078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Priming and false memories from Deese-Roediger-McDermott lists on a fragment completion test with children.
    Diliberto-Macaluso KA
    Am J Psychol; 2005; 118(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 15822608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A test of the frontal lobe functioning hypothesis of age deficits in production priming.
    Geraci L
    Neuropsychology; 2006 Sep; 20(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16938016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Modality-specificity effects in priming of visual and auditory word-fragment completion.
    Gibson JM; Bahrey R
    J Gen Psychol; 2005 Apr; 132(2):117-37. PubMed ID: 15871296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Testing the exclusivity effect in location memory.
    Clark DP; Dunn AK; Baguley T
    Memory; 2013; 21(4):512-23. PubMed ID: 23198933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Enhancing effects of acute psychosocial stress on priming of non-declarative memory in healthy young adults.
    Hidalgo V; Villada C; Almela M; Espín L; Gómez-Amor J; Salvador A
    Stress; 2012 May; 15(3):329-38. PubMed ID: 22043868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Interference from mere thinking: mental rehearsal temporarily disrupts recall of motor memory.
    Yin C; Wei K
    J Neurophysiol; 2014 Aug; 112(3):594-602. PubMed ID: 24805082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Consequences of violating the assumption of independence in the process dissociation procedure: a word fragment completion study.
    Russo R; Cullis AM; Parkin AJ
    Mem Cognit; 1998 Jul; 26(4):617-32. PubMed ID: 9701954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. ERP and behavioural evidence for direct suppression of unwanted memories.
    Bergström ZM; de Fockert JW; Richardson-Klavehn A
    Neuroimage; 2009 Dec; 48(4):726-37. PubMed ID: 19563900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Do novel associative word stem completion and cued recall share the same memory retrieval processes?
    Gooding PA; Mayes AR; van Eijk R; Meudell PR; MacDonald FL
    Memory; 1999 May; 7(3):323-43. PubMed ID: 10659081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of working memory load on long-term word priming.
    Baqués J; Sáiz D; Bowers JS
    Memory; 2004 May; 12(3):301-13. PubMed ID: 15279434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Dissociating word stem completion and cued recall as a function of divided attention at retrieval.
    Clarke AJ; Butler LT
    Memory; 2008 Oct; 16(7):763-72. PubMed ID: 18720222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Inhibition and interference in the think/no-think task.
    Racsmány M; Conway MA; Keresztes A; Krajcsi A
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Feb; 40(2):168-76. PubMed ID: 21987123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Lexical and semantic search in cued recall, fragment completion, perceptual identification, and recognition.
    Nelson DL; McEvoy CL; Bajo MT
    Am J Psychol; 1988; 101(4):465-80. PubMed ID: 3232723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Immediate and delayed recall of a small-scale spatial array.
    Tlauka M; Donaldson P; Bonnar D
    Memory; 2015; 23(3):420-6. PubMed ID: 24641312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Transcranial direct current stimulation over multiple days improves learning and maintenance of a novel vocabulary.
    Meinzer M; Jähnigen S; Copland DA; Darkow R; Grittner U; Avirame K; Rodriguez AD; Lindenberg R; Flöel A
    Cortex; 2014 Jan; 50():137-47. PubMed ID: 23988131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.