These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24576269)
21. What we mean when we talk about "conflict of interest". Frey JJ WMJ; 2007 Apr; 106(2):49. PubMed ID: 17479817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Conflict of interest: the Achilles heel of evidence-based dentistry. Koka S Int J Prosthodont; 2008; 21(4):364-8. PubMed ID: 18717096 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Medical partisans? Why doctors need conflicting interests. Healy D Aust N Z J Psychiatry; 2012 Aug; 46(8):704-7. PubMed ID: 22848058 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. New policies aim to minimize potential or actual conflicts of interest. Svirsky MA Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):85. PubMed ID: 15064653 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Publications and rejections. ten Have H; Gordijn B Med Health Care Philos; 2015 May; 18(2):167-70. PubMed ID: 25711490 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Are Impact Factors corrupting truth and utility in biomedical research? Suhrbier A; Poland GA Vaccine; 2013 Dec; 31(51):6041-2. PubMed ID: 24184289 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Passing the headline test. Reider B Am J Sports Med; 2007 Nov; 35(11):1807-8. PubMed ID: 17954929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Conflicts of interest that are bigger than money but never disclosed. Natarajan A J R Soc Med; 2006 Aug; 99(8):385. PubMed ID: 16893931 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Survey of conflict-of-interest disclosure policies of ophthalmology journals. Anraku A; Jin YP; Trope GE; Buys YM Ophthalmology; 2009 Jun; 116(6):1093-6. PubMed ID: 19376583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Publishing sensitive data: who calls the shots? Journals joust over conflict-of-interest rules. Marshall E Science; 1997 Apr; 276(5312):524. PubMed ID: 9148406 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Plagiarism--one disease, many manifestations. Natarajan S Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Apr; 63(4):299. PubMed ID: 26044466 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. The examination of peer review and publication in neurology. Wong VS J Child Neurol; 2010 Oct; 25(10):1298-301. PubMed ID: 20606060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Ghost- and guest-authored pharmaceutical industry-sponsored studies: abuse of academic integrity, the peer review system, and public trust. Flaherty DK Ann Pharmacother; 2013; 47(7-8):1081-3. PubMed ID: 23585648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flaws in the medical literature: who's to blame? Kassirer JP Arch Immunol Ther Exp (Warsz); 2010 Dec; 58(6):395-7. PubMed ID: 20872281 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. What's wrong with money in science. Stossel T; Shaywitz D Washington Post; 2006 Jul; ():B3. PubMed ID: 16838447 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. All above board: openness is the only option if science is to maintain its integrity. New Sci; 2004 Mar 6-12; 181(2437):3. PubMed ID: 15139348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Drug firm, relenting, allows unflattering study to appear. Altman LK N Y Times Web; 1997 Apr; ():A1, A16. PubMed ID: 11647207 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]