These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

410 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24576511)

  • 1. Rechanneling the cardiac proarrhythmia safety paradigm: a meeting report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.
    Sager PT; Gintant G; Turner JR; Pettit S; Stockbridge N
    Am Heart J; 2014 Mar; 167(3):292-300. PubMed ID: 24576511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Nonclinical proarrhythmia models: predicting Torsades de Pointes.
    Lawrence CL; Pollard CE; Hammond TG; Valentin JP
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2005; 52(1):46-59. PubMed ID: 15975832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimizing repolarization-related proarrhythmic risk in drug development and clinical practice.
    Farkas AS; Nattel S
    Drugs; 2010 Mar; 70(5):573-603. PubMed ID: 20329805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A 2015 focus on preventing drug-induced arrhythmias.
    Bossu A; van der Heyden MA; de Boer TP; Vos MA
    Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther; 2016; 14(2):245-53. PubMed ID: 26560188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A New Perspective in the Field of Cardiac Safety Testing through the Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay Paradigm.
    Fermini B; Hancox JC; Abi-Gerges N; Bridgland-Taylor M; Chaudhary KW; Colatsky T; Correll K; Crumb W; Damiano B; Erdemli G; Gintant G; Imredy J; Koerner J; Kramer J; Levesque P; Li Z; Lindqvist A; Obejero-Paz CA; Rampe D; Sawada K; Strauss DG; Vandenberg JI
    J Biomol Screen; 2016 Jan; 21(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 26170255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Relationship of clinical adverse event reports to models of arrhythmia risk.
    Ether N; Leishman D; Bailie M; Lauver A
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 100():106622. PubMed ID: 31398384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comprehensive In Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) Update from a Cardiac Safety Research Consortium / Health and Environmental Sciences Institute / FDA Meeting.
    Strauss DG; Gintant G; Li Z; Wu W; Blinova K; Vicente J; Turner JR; Sager PT
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2019 Jul; 53(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 30157676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. General Principles for the Validation of Proarrhythmia Risk Prediction Models: An Extension of the CiPA In Silico Strategy.
    Li Z; Mirams GR; Yoshinaga T; Ridder BJ; Han X; Chen JE; Stockbridge NL; Wisialowski TA; Damiano B; Severi S; Morissette P; Kowey PR; Holbrook M; Smith G; Rasmusson RL; Liu M; Song Z; Qu Z; Leishman DJ; Steidl-Nichols J; Rodriguez B; Bueno-Orovio A; Zhou X; Passini E; Edwards AG; Morotti S; Ni H; Grandi E; Clancy CE; Vandenberg J; Hill A; Nakamura M; Singer T; Polonchuk L; Greiter-Wilke A; Wang K; Nave S; Fullerton A; Sobie EA; Paci M; Musuamba Tshinanu F; Strauss DG
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan; 107(1):102-111. PubMed ID: 31709525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time for a Fully Integrated Nonclinical-Clinical Risk Assessment to Streamline QT Prolongation Liability Determinations: A Pharma Industry Perspective.
    Vargas HM; Rolf MG; Wisialowski TA; Achanzar W; Bahinski A; Bass A; Benson CT; Chaudhary KW; Couvreur N; Dota C; Engwall MJ; Michael Foley C; Gallacher D; Greiter-Wilke A; Guillon JM; Guth B; Himmel HM; Hegele-Hartung C; Ito M; Jenkinson S; Chiba K; Lagrutta A; Levesque P; Martel E; Okai Y; Peri R; Pointon A; Qu Y; Teisman A; Traebert M; Yoshinaga T; Gintant GA; Leishman DJ; Valentin JP
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2021 Feb; 109(2):310-318. PubMed ID: 32866317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrocardiographic biomarkers to confirm drug's electrophysiological effects used for proarrhythmic risk prediction under CiPA.
    Vicente J; Hosseini M; Johannesen L; Strauss DG
    J Electrocardiol; 2017; 50(6):808-813. PubMed ID: 28928044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cardiac Safety Research Consortium: can the thorough QT/QTc study be replaced by early QT assessment in routine clinical pharmacology studies? Scientific update and a research proposal for a path forward.
    Darpo B; Garnett C; Benson CT; Keirns J; Leishman D; Malik M; Mehrotra N; Prasad K; Riley S; Rodriguez I; Sager P; Sarapa N; Wallis R
    Am Heart J; 2014 Sep; 168(3):262-72. PubMed ID: 25173536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive in vitro Proarrhythmia Assay, a novel in vitro/in silico paradigm to detect ventricular proarrhythmic liability: a visionary 21st century initiative.
    Cavero I; Holzgrefe H
    Expert Opin Drug Saf; 2014 Jun; 13(6):745-58. PubMed ID: 24845945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Beyond the safety assessment of drug-mediated changes in the QT interval... what's next?
    Pugsley MK; Authier S; Towart R; Gallacher DJ; Curtis MJ
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2009; 60(1):24-7. PubMed ID: 19616107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. New in vitro model for proarrhythmia safety screening: IKs inhibition potentiates the QTc prolonging effect of IKr inhibitors in isolated guinea pig hearts.
    Kui P; Orosz S; Takács H; Sarusi A; Csík N; Rárosi F; Csekő C; Varró A; Papp JG; Forster T; Farkas AS; Farkas A
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 80():26-34. PubMed ID: 27063345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. CiPA challenges and opportunities from a non-clinical, clinical and regulatory perspectives. An overview of the safety pharmacology scientific discussion.
    Wallis R; Benson C; Darpo B; Gintant G; Kanda Y; Prasad K; Strauss DG; Valentin JP
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2018; 93():15-25. PubMed ID: 29958940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An overview of QT interval assessment in safety pharmacology.
    Lacroix P; Picard S
    Curr Protoc Pharmacol; 2006 Jul; Chapter 10():Unit10.7. PubMed ID: 22294169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Comprehensive in Vitro Proarrhythmia Assay (CiPA) initiative - Update on progress.
    Colatsky T; Fermini B; Gintant G; Pierson JB; Sager P; Sekino Y; Strauss DG; Stockbridge N
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2016; 81():15-20. PubMed ID: 27282641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Points to consider emerging from a mini-workshop on cardiac safety: assessing torsades de pointes liability.
    Bass A; Valentin JP; Fossa AA; Volders PG
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2007; 56(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 17707127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A history of the role of the hERG channel in cardiac risk assessment.
    Rampe D; Brown AM
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2013; 68(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 23538024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beat-by-beat QT interval variability, but not QT prolongation per se, predicts drug-induced torsades de pointes in the anaesthetised methoxamine-sensitized rabbit.
    Jacobson I; Carlsson L; Duker G
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2011; 63(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 20451633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.