151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24577304)
1. New palatal distraction device by both bone-borne and tooth-borne force application in a paramedian bone anchorage site: surgical and occlusal considerations on clinical cases.
Cortese A; Savastano G; Amato M; Cantone A; Boschetti C; Claudio PP
J Craniofac Surg; 2014 Mar; 25(2):589-95. PubMed ID: 24577304
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new palatal distractor device for bodily movement of maxillary bones by rigid self-locking miniplates and screws system.
Cortese A; Savastano M; Cantone A; Claudio PP
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 24(4):1341-6. PubMed ID: 23851803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Bone-supported rapid maxillary expansion with an implant-borne Hyrax screw: the Dresden Distractor].
Tausche E; Hansen L; Schneider M; Harzer W
Orthod Fr; 2008 Jun; 79(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 18505675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maxillary constriction treated by a new palatal distractor device: surgical and occlusal evaluations of 10 patients.
Cortese A; Savastano M; Savastano G; Papa F; Howard CM; Claudio PP
J Craniofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 21(2):339-43. PubMed ID: 20186084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Stability, tipping and relapse of bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion; a prospective randomized patient trial.
Koudstaal MJ; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ; Hop WC; van der Wal KG
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 38(4):308-15. PubMed ID: 19278832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Rotterdam Palatal Distractor: introduction of the new bone-borne device and report of the pilot study.
Koudstaal MJ; van der Wal KG; Wolvius EB; Schulten AJ
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Jan; 35(1):31-5. PubMed ID: 16154318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Application and effectiveness of a mini-implant- and tooth-borne rapid palatal expansion device: the hybrid hyrax.
Wilmes B; Nienkemper M; Drescher D
World J Orthod; 2010; 11(4):323-30. PubMed ID: 21490997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. One-step transversal palatal distraction and maxillary repositioning: technical considerations, advantages, and long-term stability.
Cortese A; Savastano M; Savastano G; Claudio PP
J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Sep; 22(5):1714-9. PubMed ID: 21959418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bidimensional dentoalveolar distraction osteogenesis for treatment efficiency.
Uribe F; Agarwal S; Janakiraman N; Shafer D; Nanda R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2013 Aug; 144(2):290-8. PubMed ID: 23910210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Transverse maxillary distraction in patients with periodontal pathology or insufficient tooth anchorage using custom-made devices.
Fernández-Sanromán J; Donascimento MG; López AC; Ferro MF; Berrondo IA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2010 Jul; 68(7):1530-6. PubMed ID: 20417007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Three-dimensional prospective evaluation of tooth-borne and bone-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion.
Nada RM; Fudalej PS; Maal TJ; Bergé SJ; Mostafa YA; Kuijpers-Jagtman AM
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):757-62. PubMed ID: 22417772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of two maxillary protraction protocols: tooth-borne versus bone-anchored protraction facemask treatment.
Ngan P; Wilmes B; Drescher D; Martin C; Weaver B; Gunel E
Prog Orthod; 2015; 16():26. PubMed ID: 26303311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Bone-borne distractor versus tooth-borne distractor for orthodontic distraction after surgical maxillary expansion: The patient's point of view.
Garreau E; Bouscaillou J; Rattier S; Ferri J; Raoul G
Int Orthod; 2016 Jun; 14(2):214-32. PubMed ID: 27155785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Management of occlusal canting with miniscrews.
Yáñez-Vico RM; Iglesias-Linares A; Cadenas de Llano-Pérula M; Solano-Reina A; Solano-Reina E
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):737-47. PubMed ID: 24364753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New technique: Le Fort I osteotomy for maxillary advancement and palatal distraction in 1 stage.
Cortese A; Savastano G; Savastano M; Spagnuolo G; Papa F
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 67(1):223-8. PubMed ID: 19070774
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional bone-anchored palatal distractor using an orthodontic palatal expander for the transverse maxillary distraction osteogenesis: technical note.
Iida S; Haraguchi S; Aikawa T; Yashiro K; Okura M; Kogo M
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):e8-11. PubMed ID: 18230382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Short-term skeletal and dental changes following bone-borne versus tooth-borne surgically assisted rapid maxillary expansion: a randomized clinical trial study.
Zandi M; Miresmaeili A; Heidari A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1190-5. PubMed ID: 24704281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transverse changes during maxillary expansion with 4-point bone-borne and tooth-borne maxillary expanders.
Mosleh MI; Kaddah MA; Abd ElSayed FA; ElSayed HS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Oct; 148(4):599-607. PubMed ID: 26432315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reliable surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion by maxillary widening device.
Seitz O; Landes CA; Philipp DJ; Sader R; Klein CM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 May; 19(3):846-9. PubMed ID: 18520418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Differential treatment effects of two anchorage systems for rapid maxillary expansion: a retrospective cephalometric study.
Hourfar J; Kinzinger GS; Ludwig B; Spindler J; Lisson JA
J Orofac Orthop; 2016 Sep; 77(5):314-24. PubMed ID: 27272056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
