212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24578254)
1. Significance of the diagnostic categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic masses.
Layfield LJ; Schmidt RL; Hirschowitz SL; Olson MT; Ali SZ; Dodd LL
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):292-6. PubMed ID: 24578254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy in patients with suspected pancreatic carcinoma.
Eloubeidi MA; Jhala D; Chhieng DC; Chen VK; Eltoum I; Vickers S; Mel Wilcox C; Jhala N
Cancer; 2003 Oct; 99(5):285-92. PubMed ID: 14579295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variation of cytopathologists' use of the indeterminate diagnostic categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" in the cytologic diagnosis of solid pancreatic lesions on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates.
Virk RK; Gamez R; Mehrotra S; Atieh M; Barkan GA; Wojcik EM; Pambuccian SE
Diagn Cytopathol; 2017 Jan; 45(1):3-13. PubMed ID: 27873469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic fine-needle aspiration: potential pitfalls in one institution's experience of 1212 procedures.
Bergeron JP; Perry KD; Houser PM; Yang J
Cancer Cytopathol; 2015 Feb; 123(2):98-107. PubMed ID: 25410732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of repeated endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in small solid pancreatic masses with previous indeterminate and negative cytological findings.
Tadic M; Kujundzic M; Stoos-Veic T; Kaic G; Vukelic-Markovic M
Dig Dis; 2008; 26(4):377-82. PubMed ID: 19188731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fluorescence in situ hybridization and K-ras analyses improve diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic masses.
Reicher S; Boyar FZ; Albitar M; Sulcova V; Agersborg S; Nga V; Zhou Y; Li G; Venegas R; French SW; Chung DS; Stabile BE; Eysselein VE; Anguiano A
Pancreas; 2011 Oct; 40(7):1057-62. PubMed ID: 21705950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. EUS-guided FNA diagnostic yield of malignancy in solid pancreatic masses: a benchmark for quality performance measurement.
Savides TJ; Donohue M; Hunt G; Al-Haddad M; Aslanian H; Ben-Menachem T; Chen VK; Coyle W; Deutsch J; DeWitt J; Dhawan M; Eckardt A; Eloubeidi M; Esker A; Gordon SR; Gress F; Ikenberry S; Joyce AM; Klapman J; Lo S; Maluf-Filho F; Nickl N; Singh V; Wills J; Behling C
Gastrointest Endosc; 2007 Aug; 66(2):277-82. PubMed ID: 17643700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trends in pancreatic pathology practice before and after implementation of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration: an example of disruptive innovation effect?
Eltoum IA; Alston EA; Roberson J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Apr; 136(4):447-53. PubMed ID: 22458907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Malignancy risk for the categories: Non-diagnostic, benign, atypical, suspicious, and malignant used in the categorization of endobronchial ultrasound guided-fine needle aspirates of pulmonary nodules.
Layfield LJ; Dodd L; Witt B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Nov; 43(11):892-6. PubMed ID: 26331778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Outcomes of endoscopic ultrasound-guided pancreatic FNAC diagnosis for solid and cystic lesions at Manchester Royal Infirmary based upon the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology pancreaticobiliary terminology classification scheme.
Wright PK; Shelton DA; Holbrook MR; Thiryayi SA; Narine N; Slater D; Rana DN
Cytopathology; 2018 Feb; 29(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 29193477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. KRAS mutation testing on all non-malignant diagnosis of pancreatic endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsies improves diagnostic accuracy.
Trisolini E; Armellini E; Paganotti A; Veggiani C; Bozzola C; Frattini M; Pizio C; Mancuso G; Andorno S; Boldorini R
Pathology; 2017 Jun; 49(4):379-386. PubMed ID: 28450086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in 179 cases: the M. D. Anderson Cancer Center experience.
Shin HJ; Lahoti S; Sneige N
Cancer; 2002 Jun; 96(3):174-80. PubMed ID: 12115306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Significance of atypia in pancreatic and bile duct brushings: follow-up analysis of the categories atypical and suspicious for malignancy.
Chadwick BE; Layfield LJ; Witt BL; Schmidt RL; Cox RN; Adler DG
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):285-91. PubMed ID: 24167030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Suspicious cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNA of the pancreas: Follow-up and outcomes.
Alston EA; Bae S; Eltoum IA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2016 Jan; 124(1):53-7. PubMed ID: 26335261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: Performance and outcomes.
Fisher L; Segarajasingam DS; Stewart C; Deboer WB; Yusoff IF
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2009 Jan; 24(1):90-6. PubMed ID: 19196396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. EUS-guided FNA for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms: a meta-analysis.
Hewitt MJ; McPhail MJ; Possamai L; Dhar A; Vlavianos P; Monahan KJ
Gastrointest Endosc; 2012 Feb; 75(2):319-31. PubMed ID: 22248600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The frequency and cancer risk associated with the atypical cytologic diagnostic category in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration specimens of solid pancreatic lesions: a meta-analysis and argument for a Bethesda System for Reporting Cytopathology of the Pancreas.
Abdelgawwad MS; Alston E; Eltoum IA
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Nov; 121(11):620-8. PubMed ID: 23881871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology of solid liver lesions: a large single-center experience.
DeWitt J; LeBlanc J; McHenry L; Ciaccia D; Imperiale T; Chappo J; Cramer H; McGreevy K; Chriswell M; Sherman S
Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 Sep; 98(9):1976-81. PubMed ID: 14499774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Impact of inconclusive endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration results in the management and outcome of patients with solid pancreatic masses.
Sun B; Yang X; Ping B; He Y; Zhang Z
Dig Endosc; 2015 Jan; 27(1):130-6. PubMed ID: 24837987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pancreatic fine-needle aspiration cytology in patients < 35-years of age: a retrospective review of 174 cases spanning a 17-year period.
Redelman M; Cramer HM; Wu HH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Apr; 42(4):297-301. PubMed ID: 24273058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
