83 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24578283)
1. MMP-9 expression increases according to the grade of squamous intraepithelial lesion in cervical smears.
Matheus ER; Zonta MA; Discacciati MG; Paruci P; Velame F; Cardeal LB; Barros SB; Pignatari AC; Maria-Engler SS
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Oct; 42(10):827-33. PubMed ID: 24578283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. "Immunocytochemical expression of P53, PTEN, FAS (CD95), P16INK4A and HPV L1 major capsid proteins in ThinPrep cervical samples with squamous intraepithelial lesions".
Grapsa D; Frangou-Plemenou M; Kondi-Pafiti A; Stergiou E; Nicolopoulou-Stamati P; Patsouris E; Chelidonis G; Athanassiadou P
Diagn Cytopathol; 2014 Jun; 42(6):465-75. PubMed ID: 23729286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Pap Smear miR-92a-5p and miR-155-5p as potential diagnostic biomarkers of squamous intraepithelial cervical cancer.
Azimi T; Paryan M; Mondanizadeh M; Sarmadian H; Zamani A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2021 Apr; 22(4):1271-1277. PubMed ID: 33906322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. BORIS and CTCF are overexpressed in squamous intraepithelial lesions and cervical cancer.
Velázquez-Hernández N; Reyes-Romero MA; Barragán-Hernández M; Guerrero-Romero F; Rodríguez-Moran M; Aguilar-Durán M; Lazalde Medina B
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Jun; 14(2):6094-100. PubMed ID: 26125810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Association between concurrent genital bleeding and cervical cancer: a cross-sectional study.
Xavier-Júnior JC; Vale DB; Zeferino LC; Dufloth RM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2015 Sep; 94(9):949-53. PubMed ID: 26033639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of HPV test versus conventional and automation-assisted Pap screening as potential screening tools for preventing cervical cancer.
Nieminen P; Vuorma S; Viikki M; Hakama M; Anttila A
BJOG; 2004 Aug; 111(8):842-8. PubMed ID: 15270934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predictive Value of Cytokeratin 7 Immunohistochemistry in Cervical Low-grade Squamous Intraepithelial Lesion as a Marker for Risk of Progression to a High-grade Lesion.
Paquette C; Mills AM; Stoler MH
Am J Surg Pathol; 2016 Feb; 40(2):236-43. PubMed ID: 26551618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The colposcopic impression. Is it influenced by the colposcopist's knowledge of the findings on the referral Papanicolaou smear?
Pretorius RG; Belinson JL; Zhang WH; Burchette RJ; Elson P; Qiao YL
J Reprod Med; 2001 Aug; 46(8):724-8. PubMed ID: 11547646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pre-vaccination prevalence of infections with 25 non-high-risk human papillomavirus types among 1,000 Slovenian women in cervical cancer screening.
Učakar V; Poljak M; Oštrbenk A; Klavs I
J Med Virol; 2014 Oct; 86(10):1772-9. PubMed ID: 24978445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytopathological pattern of cervical Pap smear according to the Bethesda system in Southwestern Saudi Arabia.
Elhakeem HA; Al-Ghamdi AS; Al-Maghrabi JA
Saudi Med J; 2005 Apr; 26(4):588-92. PubMed ID: 15900366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The degree of agreement between HPV testing, pap smear and colposcopy in cervical dysplasia diagnosis.
Melinte-Popescu A; Costăchescu G
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2012; 116(2):536-9. PubMed ID: 23077949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Distribution of human papillomavirus genotypes in Paraguayan women according to the severity of the cervical lesion.
Mendoza LP; Arbiza J; Paez M; Kasamatsu E; Castro A; Giménez G; Basiletti J; Gonzalez J; Mongelós P; Picconi MA
J Med Virol; 2011 Aug; 83(8):1351-7. PubMed ID: 21618554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Significance of a cervical cytologic diagnosis of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance. Favoring a reactive process or low grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Gonzalez D; Hernandez E; Anderson L; Heller P; Atkinson BF
J Reprod Med; 1996 Oct; 41(10):719-23. PubMed ID: 9026557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Usefulness of liquid-based cytology specimens for the immunocytochemical study of p16 expression and human papillomavirus testing: a comparative study using simultaneously sampled histology materials.
Yoshida T; Fukuda T; Sano T; Kanuma T; Owada N; Nakajima T
Cancer; 2004 Apr; 102(2):100-8. PubMed ID: 15098254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The association between HIV infection, antiretroviral therapy and cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions in South Western Nigerian women.
Ezechi OC; Pettersson KO; Okolo CA; Ujah IA; Ostergren PO
PLoS One; 2014; 9(5):e97150. PubMed ID: 24809726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pap test accuracy and severity of squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Cobucci R; Maisonnette M; Macêdo E; Santos Filho FC; Rodovalho P; Nóbrega MM; Goncalves A
Indian J Cancer; 2016; 53(1):74-6. PubMed ID: 27146747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. AgNOR counts in cervical smears under normal and other cytopathologic conditions.
Misra JS; Das V; Srivastava AN; Singh U; Singh M
Anal Quant Cytol Histol; 2005 Dec; 27(6):337-40. PubMed ID: 16450790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparative measurement of D- and L-lactic acid isomers in vaginal secretions: association with high-grade cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions.
de Magalhães CCB; Linhares IM; Masullo LF; Eleutério RMN; Witkin SS; Eleutério J
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Feb; 305(2):373-377. PubMed ID: 34554315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. DLG1 polarity protein expression associates with the disease progress of low-grade cervical intraepithelial lesions.
Cavatorta AL; Di Gregorio A; Bugnon Valdano M; Marziali F; Cabral M; Bottai H; Cittadini J; Nocito AL; Gardiol D
Exp Mol Pathol; 2017 Feb; 102(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 28040505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
