These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24578543)

  • 1. Benefits and barriers to participation in colorectal cancer screening: a protocol for a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative studies.
    Honein-Abouhaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Rabeneck L; Tinmouth J; Straus S; Baxter NN
    BMJ Open; 2014 Feb; 4(2):e004508. PubMed ID: 24578543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.
    Osborne SR; Alston LV; Bolton KA; Whelan J; Reeve E; Wong Shee A; Browne J; Walker T; Versace VL; Allender S; Nichols M; Backholer K; Goodwin N; Lewis S; Dalton H; Prael G; Curtin M; Brooks R; Verdon S; Crockett J; Hodgins G; Walsh S; Lyle DM; Thompson SC; Browne LJ; Knight S; Pit SW; Jones M; Gillam MH; Leach MJ; Gonzalez-Chica DA; Muyambi K; Eshetie T; Tran K; May E; Lieschke G; Parker V; Smith A; Hayes C; Dunlop AJ; Rajappa H; White R; Oakley P; Holliday S
    Med J Aust; 2020 Dec; 213 Suppl 11():S3-S32.e1. PubMed ID: 33314144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies.
    Albers B; Auer R; Caci L; Nyantakyi E; Plys E; Podmore C; Riegel F; Selby K; Walder J; Clack L
    Syst Rev; 2023 Feb; 12(1):26. PubMed ID: 36849979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The future of Cochrane Neonatal.
    Soll RF; Ovelman C; McGuire W
    Early Hum Dev; 2020 Nov; 150():105191. PubMed ID: 33036834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Social determinants and participation in fecal occult blood test based colorectal cancer screening: A qualitative systematic review and meta-synthesis.
    Marinucci N; Moy N; Koloski N; Shah A; Austin G; Russell-Bennett R; McGraw J; Dulleck U; Holtmann G
    Health Promot J Austr; 2024 Jan; 35(1):9-36. PubMed ID: 37039425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Systematic Review and Meta-study Synthesis of Qualitative Studies Evaluating Facilitators and Barriers to Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Honein-AbouHaidar GN; Kastner M; Vuong V; Perrier L; Daly C; Rabeneck L; Straus S; Baxter NN
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jun; 25(6):907-17. PubMed ID: 27197277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
    Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
    Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What is the effectiveness of various invitation methods to a colonoscopy in the early detection and prevention of colorectal cancer? Protocol of a systematic review.
    Stark UA; Frese T; Unverzagt S; Bauer A
    Syst Rev; 2020 Mar; 9(1):49. PubMed ID: 32143683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Chemoprevention of colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation.
    Cooper K; Squires H; Carroll C; Papaioannou D; Booth A; Logan RF; Maguire C; Hind D; Tappenden P
    Health Technol Assess; 2010 Jun; 14(32):1-206. PubMed ID: 20594533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Colorectal cancer screening participation: a systematic review.
    Wools A; Dapper EA; de Leeuw JR
    Eur J Public Health; 2016 Feb; 26(1):158-68. PubMed ID: 26370437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Social media and mobile health technology for cancer screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.
    Ruco A; Dossa F; Tinmouth J; Llovet D; Kishibe T; Baxter NN
    BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e035411. PubMed ID: 32029500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review.
    Belon AP; McKenzie E; Teare G; Nykiforuk CIJ; Nieuwendyk L; Kim MO; Lee B; Adhikari K
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2024 Jan; 24(1):128. PubMed ID: 38263112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Patient experience, satisfaction and shared decision-making in colorectal cancer screening: protocol of the mixed-methods study CyDESA.
    Selva A; López P; Puig T; Macià F; Selva C; Álvarez-Pérez Y; Terraza R; Burón A; Machlab ST; Pericay C; Solà I; Torà N; Rodríguez V; Barrufet C; Aymar A; Baré M
    BMJ Open; 2022 May; 12(5):e057687. PubMed ID: 35636783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests for Indigenous adults: A systematic literature review of barriers, enablers and implemented strategies.
    D'Onise K; Iacobini ET; Canuto KJ
    Prev Med; 2020 May; 134():106018. PubMed ID: 32057956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Experiences and perceived health benefits of individuals with a disability participating in sport: A systematic review protocol.
    Aitchison B; Rushton A; Martin P; Soundy A; Heneghan NR
    BMJ Open; 2020 Nov; 10(11):e038214. PubMed ID: 33234625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. How narratives influence colorectal cancer screening decision making and uptake: A realist review.
    Woudstra AJ; Suurmond J
    Health Expect; 2019 Jun; 22(3):327-337. PubMed ID: 31025444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Associations between school-based peer networks and smoking according to socioeconomic status and tobacco control context: protocol for a mixed method systematic review.
    Littlecott HJ; Hawkins J; Mann M; Melendez-Torres GJ; Dobbie F; Moore G
    Syst Rev; 2019 Dec; 8(1):313. PubMed ID: 31810493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Barriers of colorectal cancer screening in rural USA: a systematic review.
    Wang H; Roy S; Kim J; Farazi PA; Siahpush M; Su D
    Rural Remote Health; 2019 Aug; 19(3):5181. PubMed ID: 31394041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Barriers and enablers to diabetic retinopathy screening attendance: Protocol for a systematic review.
    Graham-Rowe E; Lorencatto F; Lawrenson JG; Burr J; Grimshaw JM; Ivers NM; Peto T; Bunce C; Francis JJ;
    Syst Rev; 2016 Aug; 5(1):134. PubMed ID: 27515938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.