BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24579672)

  • 1. 'Should I stay or should I go?' Bacterial attachment vs biofilm formation on surface-modified membranes.
    Bernstein R; Freger V; Lee JH; Kim YG; Lee J; Herzberg M
    Biofouling; 2014; 30(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 24579672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bacterial attachment to RO membranes surface-modified by concentration-polarization-enhanced graft polymerization.
    Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
    Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):5973-80. PubMed ID: 21682251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impacts of hydrophilic colanic acid on bacterial attachment to microfiltration membranes and subsequent membrane biofouling.
    Yoshida K; Tashiro Y; May T; Okabe S
    Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():33-42. PubMed ID: 25776918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Grafted Polymer Coatings Enhance Fouling Inhibition by an Antimicrobial Peptide on Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
    Shtreimer Kandiyote N; Avisdris T; Arnusch CJ; Kasher R
    Langmuir; 2019 Feb; 35(5):1935-1943. PubMed ID: 30576152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biofouling ecology as a means to better understand membrane biofouling.
    Vanysacker L; Boerjan B; Declerck P; Vankelecom IF
    Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Oct; 98(19):8047-72. PubMed ID: 25125038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dynamics of biofilm formation under different nutrient levels and the effect on biofouling of a reverse osmosis membrane system.
    Chen X; Suwarno SR; Chong TH; McDougald D; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Fane AG; Rice SA
    Biofouling; 2013; 29(3):319-30. PubMed ID: 23528128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
    Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
    Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination.
    Sweity A; Oren Y; Ronen Z; Herzberg M
    Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3389-98. PubMed ID: 23615335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling mitigation.
    Ben-Sasson M; Lu X; Bar-Zeev E; Zodrow KR; Nejati S; Qi G; Giannelis EP; Elimelech M
    Water Res; 2014 Oct; 62():260-70. PubMed ID: 24963888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The correlation between biofilm biopolymer composition and membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors.
    Luo J; Zhang J; Tan X; McDougald D; Zhuang G; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Rice SA
    Biofouling; 2014 Oct; 30(9):1093-110. PubMed ID: 25367774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Biofouling Mitigation in Forward Osmosis Using Graphene Oxide Functionalized Thin-Film Composite Membranes.
    Perreault F; Jaramillo H; Xie M; Ude M; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(11):5840-8. PubMed ID: 27160324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
    Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Ho G
    J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():586-599. PubMed ID: 29975885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
    Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
    Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using a multi-faceted approach to determine the changes in bacterial cell surface properties influenced by a biofilm lifestyle.
    Mukherjee J; Karunakaran E; Biggs CA
    Biofouling; 2012; 28(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22150164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
    Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
    Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surfaces presenting α-phenyl mannoside derivatives enable formation of stable, high coverage, non-pathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms against pathogen colonization.
    Zhu Z; Wang J; Lopez AI; Yu F; Huang Y; Kumar A; Li S; Zhang L; Cai C
    Biomater Sci; 2015 Jun; 3(6):842-51. PubMed ID: 26221844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of biofouling on pharmaceuticals rejection in NF membrane filtration.
    Botton S; Verliefde AR; Quach NT; Cornelissen ER
    Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5848-60. PubMed ID: 22960036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Period four metal nanoparticles on the inhibition of biofouling.
    Chapman J; Weir E; Regan F
    Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Jul; 78(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 20356719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparative study of biofilm formation by Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli using epifluorescence microscopy on stainless steel and a microtitre plate method.
    Rivas L; Dykes GA; Fegan N
    J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Apr; 69(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17239460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes.
    Myint AA; Lee W; Mun S; Ahn CH; Lee S; Yoon J
    Biofouling; 2010; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 20087803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.