229 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24579672)
1. 'Should I stay or should I go?' Bacterial attachment vs biofilm formation on surface-modified membranes.
Bernstein R; Freger V; Lee JH; Kim YG; Lee J; Herzberg M
Biofouling; 2014; 30(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 24579672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Bacterial attachment to RO membranes surface-modified by concentration-polarization-enhanced graft polymerization.
Bernstein R; Belfer S; Freger V
Environ Sci Technol; 2011 Jul; 45(14):5973-80. PubMed ID: 21682251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Impacts of hydrophilic colanic acid on bacterial attachment to microfiltration membranes and subsequent membrane biofouling.
Yoshida K; Tashiro Y; May T; Okabe S
Water Res; 2015 Jun; 76():33-42. PubMed ID: 25776918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Grafted Polymer Coatings Enhance Fouling Inhibition by an Antimicrobial Peptide on Reverse Osmosis Membranes.
Shtreimer Kandiyote N; Avisdris T; Arnusch CJ; Kasher R
Langmuir; 2019 Feb; 35(5):1935-1943. PubMed ID: 30576152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biofouling ecology as a means to better understand membrane biofouling.
Vanysacker L; Boerjan B; Declerck P; Vankelecom IF
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2014 Oct; 98(19):8047-72. PubMed ID: 25125038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Dynamics of biofilm formation under different nutrient levels and the effect on biofouling of a reverse osmosis membrane system.
Chen X; Suwarno SR; Chong TH; McDougald D; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Fane AG; Rice SA
Biofouling; 2013; 29(3):319-30. PubMed ID: 23528128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of higher alginate expression on deposition of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in radial stagnation point flow and reverse osmosis systems.
Herzberg M; Rezene TZ; Ziemba C; Gillor O; Mathee K
Environ Sci Technol; 2009 Oct; 43(19):7376-83. PubMed ID: 19848149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of antiscalants on biofouling of RO membranes in seawater desalination.
Sweity A; Oren Y; Ronen Z; Herzberg M
Water Res; 2013 Jun; 47(10):3389-98. PubMed ID: 23615335
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. In situ formation of silver nanoparticles on thin-film composite reverse osmosis membranes for biofouling mitigation.
Ben-Sasson M; Lu X; Bar-Zeev E; Zodrow KR; Nejati S; Qi G; Giannelis EP; Elimelech M
Water Res; 2014 Oct; 62():260-70. PubMed ID: 24963888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The correlation between biofilm biopolymer composition and membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors.
Luo J; Zhang J; Tan X; McDougald D; Zhuang G; Fane AG; Kjelleberg S; Cohen Y; Rice SA
Biofouling; 2014 Oct; 30(9):1093-110. PubMed ID: 25367774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biofouling Mitigation in Forward Osmosis Using Graphene Oxide Functionalized Thin-Film Composite Membranes.
Perreault F; Jaramillo H; Xie M; Ude M; Nghiem LD; Elimelech M
Environ Sci Technol; 2016 Jun; 50(11):5840-8. PubMed ID: 27160324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Review - Bacteria and their extracellular polymeric substances causing biofouling on seawater reverse osmosis desalination membranes.
Nagaraj V; Skillman L; Li D; Ho G
J Environ Manage; 2018 Oct; 223():586-599. PubMed ID: 29975885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biofouling of reverse osmosis membranes: effects of cleaning on biofilm microbial communities, membrane performance, and adherence of extracellular polymeric substances.
Al Ashhab A; Sweity A; Bayramoglu B; Herzberg M; Gillor O
Biofouling; 2017 May; 33(5):397-409. PubMed ID: 28468513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Using a multi-faceted approach to determine the changes in bacterial cell surface properties influenced by a biofilm lifestyle.
Mukherjee J; Karunakaran E; Biggs CA
Biofouling; 2012; 28(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 22150164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization and effect of biofouling on polyamide reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membrane surfaces.
Khan MM; Stewart PS; Moll DJ; Mickols WE; Nelson SE; Camper AK
Biofouling; 2011 Feb; 27(2):173-83. PubMed ID: 21253926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surfaces presenting α-phenyl mannoside derivatives enable formation of stable, high coverage, non-pathogenic Escherichia coli biofilms against pathogen colonization.
Zhu Z; Wang J; Lopez AI; Yu F; Huang Y; Kumar A; Li S; Zhang L; Cai C
Biomater Sci; 2015 Jun; 3(6):842-51. PubMed ID: 26221844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of biofouling on pharmaceuticals rejection in NF membrane filtration.
Botton S; Verliefde AR; Quach NT; Cornelissen ER
Water Res; 2012 Nov; 46(18):5848-60. PubMed ID: 22960036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Period four metal nanoparticles on the inhibition of biofouling.
Chapman J; Weir E; Regan F
Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces; 2010 Jul; 78(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 20356719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparative study of biofilm formation by Shiga toxigenic Escherichia coli using epifluorescence microscopy on stainless steel and a microtitre plate method.
Rivas L; Dykes GA; Fegan N
J Microbiol Methods; 2007 Apr; 69(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 17239460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of membrane surface properties on the behavior of initial bacterial adhesion and biofilm development onto nanofiltration membranes.
Myint AA; Lee W; Mun S; Ahn CH; Lee S; Yoon J
Biofouling; 2010; 26(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 20087803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]