These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24579878)

  • 1. Stimulus type and the list strength paradigm.
    Osth AF; Dennis S; Kinnell A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(9):1826-41. PubMed ID: 24579878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the role of individual items in recognition memory and metacognition: challenges for signal detection theory.
    Busey TA; Arici A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1123-36. PubMed ID: 19686009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Unmasking a shady mirror effect: recognition of normal versus obscured faces.
    Vokey JR; Hockley WE
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(4):739-59. PubMed ID: 22182292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Null category-length and target-lure relatedness effects in episodic recognition: a constraint on item-noise interference models.
    Cho KW; Neely JH
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(7):1331-55. PubMed ID: 23234500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of conceptual processing on familiarity-based recognition.
    Ngo CT; Brown A; Sargent J; Dopkins S
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2010 Mar; 64(1):67-76. PubMed ID: 20384421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of stimulus type in list length effects in recognition memory.
    Kinnell A; Dennis S
    Mem Cognit; 2012 Apr; 40(3):311-25. PubMed ID: 22161208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Category-length and category-strength effects using images of scenes.
    Baumann O; Vromen JMG; Boddy AC; Crawshaw E; Humphreys MS
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1234-1247. PubMed ID: 29931621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dissociating positive and negative influences of verbal processing on the recognition of pictures of faces and objects.
    Nakabayashi K; Burton AM; Brandimonte MA; Lloyd-Jones TJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Mar; 38(2):376-90. PubMed ID: 21988409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Homogeneity of item material boosts the list length effect in recognition memory: A global matching perspective.
    Brandt M; Zaiser AK; Schnuerch M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 May; 45(5):834-850. PubMed ID: 29985029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Category length produces an inverted-U discriminability function in episodic recognition memory.
    Neely JH; Tse CS
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jun; 62(6):1141-72. PubMed ID: 19048453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Cue quality and criterion setting in recognition memory.
    Kent C; Lamberts K; Patton R
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Jul; 46(5):757-769. PubMed ID: 29396751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Source memory for unidentified stimuli.
    Kurilla BP; Westerman DL
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):398-410. PubMed ID: 20192538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex differences in face processing: Are women less lateralized and faster than men?
    Godard O; Fiori N
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Aug; 73(3):167-75. PubMed ID: 20621740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A dynamic stimulus-driven model of signal detection.
    Turner BM; Van Zandt T; Brown S
    Psychol Rev; 2011 Oct; 118(4):583-613. PubMed ID: 21895383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The distribution of subjective memory strength: list strength and response bias.
    Criss AH
    Cogn Psychol; 2009 Dec; 59(4):297-319. PubMed ID: 19765699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differentiation and response bias in episodic memory: evidence from reaction time distributions.
    Criss AH
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Mar; 36(2):484-99. PubMed ID: 20192544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Attentional modulation of repetition attenuation is anatomically dissociable for scenes and faces.
    Yi DJ; Kelley TA; Marois R; Chun MM
    Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 1080(1):53-62. PubMed ID: 16507300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter string processing and visual short-term memory.
    Ktori M; Grainger J; Dufau S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):465-73. PubMed ID: 21958206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pattern recognition in tufted capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella): the role of the spatial organisation of stimulus parts.
    De Lillo C; Spinozzi G; Truppa V
    Behav Brain Res; 2007 Jul; 181(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 17467068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.