These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24580670)

  • 1. Incomplete behavioural isolation and asymmetric female preference in darter sister species (Percidae: Etheostoma).
    Martin MD; Mendelson TC
    J Fish Biol; 2013 Nov; 83(5):1371-80. PubMed ID: 24580670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reproductive isolation between two darter species is enhanced and asymmetric in sympatry.
    Zhou M; Fuller RC
    J Fish Biol; 2014 May; 84(5):1389-400. PubMed ID: 24724945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Male rainbow darters (Etheostoma caeruleum) prefer larger conspecific females.
    Soudry O; Kaira H; Parsa S; Mendelson T
    Behav Processes; 2020 Jan; 170():104013. PubMed ID: 31751600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reinforcement in the banded darter
    Roberts NS; Mendelson TC
    Ecol Evol; 2020 Mar; 10(5):2499-2512. PubMed ID: 32184997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seasonal colour and antipredator behaviour in Etheostoma (Percidae).
    Moran RL; von Ende CN; King BH
    J Fish Biol; 2014 Apr; 84(4):1188-94. PubMed ID: 24588710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The accumulation of reproductive isolation in early stages of divergence supports a role for sexual selection.
    Martin MD; Mendelson TC
    J Evol Biol; 2016 Apr; 29(4):676-89. PubMed ID: 26717252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Egg viability decreases rapidly with time since ovulation in the rainbow darter Etheostoma caeruleum: implications for the costs of choosiness.
    Moran RL; Soukup RM; Zhou M; Fuller RC
    J Fish Biol; 2018 Feb; 92(2):532-536. PubMed ID: 29230804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Agonistic character displacement of genetically based male colour patterns across darters.
    Moran RL; Fuller RC
    Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Aug; 285(1884):. PubMed ID: 30068684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sex differences in mate recognition and conspecific preference in species with mutual mate choice.
    Kozak GM; Reisland M; Boughmann JW
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):353-65. PubMed ID: 19154359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Male and female preference for conspecifics in a fish with male parental care (Percidae: Catonotus).
    O'Rourke CF; Mendelson TC
    Behav Processes; 2010 Oct; 85(2):157-62. PubMed ID: 20637844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interspecific interactions and learning variability jointly drive geographic differences in mate preferences.
    Verzijden MN; Svensson EI
    Evolution; 2016 Aug; 70(8):1896-903. PubMed ID: 27302691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Experimental evidence for asymmetric mate preference and aggression: behavioral interactions in a woodrat (Neotoma) hybrid zone.
    Shurtliff QR; Murphy PJ; Yeiter JD; Matocq MD
    BMC Evol Biol; 2013 Oct; 13():220. PubMed ID: 24093823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Male-driven reproductive and agonistic character displacement in darters and its implications for speciation in allopatry.
    Moran RL; Fuller RC
    Curr Zool; 2018 Feb; 64(1):101-113. PubMed ID: 29492043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation.
    McPeek MA; Gavrilets S
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1967-80. PubMed ID: 17133854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does divergent selection predict the evolution of mate preference and reproductive isolation in the tropical butterfly genus Melinaea (Nymphalidae: Ithomiini)?
    McClure M; Mahrouche L; Houssin C; Monllor M; Le Poul Y; Frérot B; Furtos A; Elias M
    J Anim Ecol; 2019 Jun; 88(6):940-952. PubMed ID: 30873614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation.
    Svensson EI; Karlsson K; Friberg M; Eroukhmanoff F
    Curr Biol; 2007 Nov; 17(22):1943-7. PubMed ID: 17935996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. REINFORCEMENT OF STICKLEBACK MATE PREFERENCES: SYMPATRY BREEDS CONTEMPT.
    Rundle HD; Schluter D
    Evolution; 1998 Feb; 52(1):200-208. PubMed ID: 28568163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Inheritance of female mating preference in a sympatric sibling species pair of Lake Victoria cichlids: implications for speciation.
    Haesler MP; Seehausen O
    Proc Biol Sci; 2005 Feb; 272(1560):237-45. PubMed ID: 15705547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Why do males choose heterospecific females in the red spider mite?
    Sato Y; Staudacher H; Sabelis MW
    Exp Appl Acarol; 2016 Jan; 68(1):21-31. PubMed ID: 26530994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sexually monomorphic mating preferences contribute to premating isolation based on song in European green lacewings.
    Noh S; Henry CS
    Evolution; 2010 Jan; 64(1):261-70. PubMed ID: 19703220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.