These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24581292)

  • 1. Why do we continue to adopt medical practices based on pathophysiology alone when we should be insisting on clinical trials?
    Prasad V; Ho N
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Apr; 67(4):361-3. PubMed ID: 24581292
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Not Available].
    Giulio Formoso, per l'Associazione Alessandro Liberati - Network italiano Cochrane
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):524-525. PubMed ID: 31808432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Not Available].
    Buzzetti R
    Recenti Prog Med; 2019 Nov; 110(11):531. PubMed ID: 31808436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Understanding observational studies.
    Drug Ther Bull; 2016 Sep; 54(9):105-8. PubMed ID: 27609426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Untapped Potential of Observational Research to Inform Clinical Decision Making: American Society of Clinical Oncology Research Statement.
    Visvanathan K; Levit LA; Raghavan D; Hudis CA; Wong S; Dueck A; Lyman GH
    J Clin Oncol; 2017 Jun; 35(16):1845-1854. PubMed ID: 28358653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Translation of Evidence Into Clinical Practice.
    Molony DA; Samuels J
    Adv Chronic Kidney Dis; 2016 Nov; 23(6):343-345. PubMed ID: 28115075
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Is there a difference between applicability and generalisability?
    Tugwell P; Knottnerus A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Mar; 119():A5-A7. PubMed ID: 32130940
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized trials, observational studies, and the illusive search for the source of truth.
    Gaudino M; Bagiella E; Chang HL; Kurlansky P
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 163(2):757-762. PubMed ID: 33277031
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Multimorbidity and evidence generation.
    Weiss CO; Varadhan R; Puhan MA; Vickers A; Bandeen-Roche K; Boyd CM; Kent DM
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Apr; 29(4):653-60. PubMed ID: 24442333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized  Controlled Trials Versus Real-World Data in the COVID-19 Era: A False Narrative.
    Lyman GH; Kuderer NM
    Cancer Invest; 2020 Nov; 38(10):537-542. PubMed ID: 33090883
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evidence is king, but reader beware: the misinterpretation of studies.
    Sigman M
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1222-3. PubMed ID: 24786743
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increasing the Impact of Randomized, Controlled Trials in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy.
    Elmunzer BJ
    Gastroenterology; 2015 Sep; 149(3):521-5. PubMed ID: 26226569
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Regarding empiricism and rationalism in medicine and 2 medical worldviews.
    Prasad V
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 Jan; 89(1):137. PubMed ID: 24388033
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Two medical worldviews.
    Ross DG
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2014 Jan; 89(1):137-8. PubMed ID: 24388032
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cochrane Reviews: Four Proposals for Improvement.
    Currow DC; Higginson IJ
    J Palliat Med; 2015 Nov; 18(11):906-7. PubMed ID: 26431264
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Benchmarking Controlled Trial--a novel concept covering all observational effectiveness studies.
    Malmivaara A
    Ann Med; 2015 Jun; 47(4):332-40. PubMed ID: 25965700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Empiricism and rationalism in medicine: can 2 competing philosophies coexist to improve the quality of medical care?
    Lanier WL; Rajkumar SV
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2013 Oct; 88(10):1042-5. PubMed ID: 24079675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical Study Designs and Sources of Error in Medical Research.
    Kacha AK; Nizamuddin SL; Nizamuddin J; Ramakrishna H; Shahul SS
    J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2018 Dec; 32(6):2789-2801. PubMed ID: 29571641
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The pros and cons of evidence-based medicine.
    Croft P; Malmivaara A; van Tulder M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Aug; 36(17):E1121-5. PubMed ID: 21629165
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.