These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24581296)

  • 21. Stakeholder engagement for comparative effectiveness research in cancer care: experience of the DEcIDE Cancer Consortium.
    Greenberg CC; Wind JK; Chang GJ; Chen RC; Schrag D
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Mar; 2(2):117-25. PubMed ID: 24236554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Assessing equivalence and noninferiority.
    Treadwell JR; Uhl S; Tipton K; Shamliyan T; Viswanathan M; Berkman ND; Sun X; Coleman CI; Elshaug AG; Singh S; Wang SY; Ramakrishnan R
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1144-9. PubMed ID: 22732455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Consensus of recommendations guiding comparative effectiveness research methods.
    Morton JB; McConeghy R; Heinrich K; Gatto NM; Caffrey AR
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2016 Dec; 25(12):1354-1360. PubMed ID: 27365094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Identification of topics for comparative effectiveness systematic reviews in the field of cancer imaging.
    Rao M; Concannon TW; Iovin R; Yu WW; Chan JA; Lypas G; Terasawa T; Gaylor JM; Kong L; Rausch AC; Lau J; Kitsios GD
    J Comp Eff Res; 2013 Sep; 2(5):483-95. PubMed ID: 24236745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. AHRQ series paper 4: assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the effective health-care program.
    Chou R; Aronson N; Atkins D; Ismaila AS; Santaguida P; Smith DH; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Moher D
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):502-12. PubMed ID: 18823754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: methodological approaches to evaluate the literature and establish best evidence.
    Skelly AC; Hashimoto RE; Norvell DC; Dettori JR; Fischer DJ; Wilson JR; Tetreault LA; Fehlings MG
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Oct; 38(22 Suppl 1):S9-18. PubMed ID: 24026148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An evaluation of the comparative effectiveness of geriatrician-led comprehensive geriatric assessment for improving patient and healthcare system outcomes for older adults: a protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Soobiah C; Daly C; Blondal E; Ewusie J; Ho J; Elliott MJ; Yue R; Holroyd-Leduc J; Liu B; Marr S; Basran J; Tricco AC; Hamid J; Straus SE
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):65. PubMed ID: 28340600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) effective health care (EHC) program methods guide for comparative effectiveness reviews: keeping up-to-date in a rapidly evolving field.
    Chang SM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Nov; 64(11):1166-7. PubMed ID: 21959053
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Good Practices for Real-World Data Studies of Treatment and/or Comparative Effectiveness: Recommendations from the Joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on Real-World Evidence in Health Care Decision Making.
    Berger ML; Sox H; Willke RJ; Brixner DL; Eichler HG; Goettsch W; Madigan D; Makady A; Schneeweiss S; Tarricone R; Wang SV; Watkins J; Mullins CD
    Value Health; 2017 Sep; 20(8):1003-1008. PubMed ID: 28964430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Engaging Stakeholders to Develop a Patient-centered Research Agenda: Lessons Learned From the Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet).
    Haynes SC; Rudov L; Nauman E; Hendryx L; Angove RSM; Carton T
    Med Care; 2018 Oct; 56 Suppl 10 Suppl 1(10 Suppl 1):S27-S32. PubMed ID: 30074948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    Newell S; Jordan Z
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):76-87. PubMed ID: 26447009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development: 3. Group composition and consultation process.
    Fretheim A; Schünemann HJ; Oxman AD
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2006 Nov; 4():15. PubMed ID: 17134482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Recommendations for assessing the risk of bias in systematic reviews of health-care interventions.
    Viswanathan M; Patnode CD; Berkman ND; Bass EB; Chang S; Hartling L; Murad MH; Treadwell JR; Kane RL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2018 May; 97():26-34. PubMed ID: 29248724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fit for purpose: perspectives on rapid reviews from end-user interviews.
    Hartling L; Guise JM; Hempel S; Featherstone R; Mitchell MD; Motu'apuaka ML; Robinson KA; Schoelles K; Totten A; Whitlock E; Wilt TJ; Anderson J; Berliner E; Gozu A; Kato E; Paynter R; Umscheid CA
    Syst Rev; 2017 Feb; 6(1):32. PubMed ID: 28212677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Overview of best practices in conducting comparative-effectiveness reviews.
    Guise JM; Viswanathan M
    Clin Pharmacol Ther; 2011 Dec; 90(6):876-82. PubMed ID: 22048219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Good research practices for comparative effectiveness research: defining, reporting and interpreting nonrandomized studies of treatment effects using secondary data sources: the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Retrospective Database Analysis Task Force Report--Part I.
    Berger ML; Mamdani M; Atkins D; Johnson ML
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1044-52. PubMed ID: 19793072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.