557 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24581635)
1. Perceptions and satisfaction of aesthetic outcome following secondary cleft rhinoplasty: evaluation by patients versus health professionals.
Byrne M; Chan JC; O'Broin E
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Oct; 42(7):1062-70. PubMed ID: 24581635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Panel and patient perceptions of nasal aesthetics after secondary cleft rhinoplasty with versus without columellar grafting.
Pitak-Arnnop P; Hemprich A; Dhanuthai K; Yildirim V; Pausch NC
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 39(5):319-25. PubMed ID: 20832328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Secondary cleft nose rhinoplasty: Subjective and objective outcome evaluation.
Gassling V; Koos B; Birkenfeld F; Wiltfang J; Zimmermann CE
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Nov; 43(9):1855-62. PubMed ID: 26412642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. High patient satisfaction after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip patients.
Hens G; Picavet VA; Poorten VV; Schoenaers J; Jorissen M; Hellings PW
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol; 2011; 1(3):167-72. PubMed ID: 22287367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Nasal appearance after secondary cleft rhinoplasty: comparison of professional rating with patient satisfaction.
Pausch NC; Unger C; Pitak-Arnnop P; Subbalekha K
Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jun; 20(2):195-201. PubMed ID: 27106142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Secondary correction of nasal deformities in cleft lip and palate patients: surgical technique and outcome evaluation.
Vass G; Mohos G; Bere Z; Ivan L; Varga J; Piffko J; Rovo L
Head Face Med; 2016 Dec; 12(1):34. PubMed ID: 27906082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospective Patient-Related Outcome Evaluation of Secondary Cleft Rhinoplasty Using a Validated Questionnaire.
Sawyer AR; Robinson S; Cadier M
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2017 Jul; 54(4):436-441. PubMed ID: 27439951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception.
Moolenburgh SE; Mureau MA; Hofer SO
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2008 Dec; 61(12):1459-64. PubMed ID: 18037361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Satisfaction survey of secondary rhinoplasty among unilateral cleft lip and palate patients.
Assouline-Vitale SL; Ruffenach L; Bodin F; Zink S; Romary B; Bruant-Rodier C; Dissaux C
Ann Chir Plast Esthet; 2023 Apr; 68(2):139-144. PubMed ID: 35934555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative evaluation of nasolabial appearance of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients by professional, patient and layperson using 2 aesthetic scoring systems: A cross sectional study.
Duggal I; Talwar A; Duggal R; Chaudhari PK; Samrit V
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 Nov; 26(4):660-666. PubMed ID: 37061872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Aesthetic and Functional Results of Lateral Crural Repositioning.
Ilhan AE; Saribas B; Caypinar B
JAMA Facial Plast Surg; 2015; 17(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 26086322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Feeling Normal? Long-Term Follow-up of Patients with a Cleft Lip-Palate after Rhinoplasty with the Derriford Appearance Scale (DAS-59).
Albers AE; Reichelt AC; Nolst-Trenité GJ; Menger DJ
Facial Plast Surg; 2016 Apr; 32(2):219-24. PubMed ID: 27097144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Results of a prospective anthropometric and functional study about aesthetics and nasal respiration after secondary rhinoplasty in cleft lip and palate patients.
Huempfner-Hierl H; Hemprich A; Hierl T
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1863-75. PubMed ID: 19816367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Patient evaluation of outcomes of external rhinoplasty for unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Sàndor GK; Ylikontiola LP
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 May; 35(5):407-11. PubMed ID: 16513323
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Functional and aesthetic outcome after surgery on cleft lip nasal deformities].
Scheithauer M; Veit J; Rotter N; Sommer F; Lindemann J; Hoffmann TK; Nordmann M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Nov; 93(11):778-84. PubMed ID: 25369163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Aesthetic outcome of cleft lip and palate treatment. Perceptions of patients, families, and health professionals compared to the general public.
Gkantidis N; Papamanou DA; Christou P; Topouzelis N
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):e105-10. PubMed ID: 23287059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment of bilateral cleft lip nose deformity: a comparison of results as judged by cleft surgeons and laypersons.
Lo LJ; Wong FH; Mardini S; Chen YR; Noordhoff MS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(3):733-8; discussion 739-41. PubMed ID: 12172130
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty.
Yu K; Kim A; Pearlman SJ
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2010; 12(5):291-7. PubMed ID: 20855769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Assessment of Patient Satisfaction With Evaluation Methods in Open Technique Septorhinoplasty.
Başer E; Kocagöz GD; Çalim ÖF; Verim A; Yilmaz F; Özturan O
J Craniofac Surg; 2016 Mar; 27(2):420-4. PubMed ID: 26967078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Split hump technique for reduction of the overprojected nasal dorsum: a statistical analysis on subjective body image in relation to nasal appearance and nasal patency in 97 patients undergoing aesthetic rhinoplasty.
Lohuis PJ; Faraj-Hakim S; Knobbe A; Duivesteijn W; Bran GM
Arch Facial Plast Surg; 2012; 14(5):346-53. PubMed ID: 22986942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
