These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24581728)

  • 1. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: examination protocol.
    Barra FR; Ribeiro AC; Mathieu OD; Rodrigues AC
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):351-2. PubMed ID: 24581728
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in routine clinical practice in 2013.
    Badr S; Laurent N; Régis C; Boulanger L; Lemaille S; Poncelet E
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Mar; 95(3):245-58. PubMed ID: 24238816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contrast-enhanced dual-energy mammography: a promising new imaging tool in breast cancer detection.
    Lalji U; Lobbes M
    Womens Health (Lond); 2014 May; 10(3):289-98. PubMed ID: 24956295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility.
    Lewin JM; Isaacs PK; Vance V; Larke FJ
    Radiology; 2003 Oct; 229(1):261-8. PubMed ID: 12888621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bilateral contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography: feasibility and comparison with conventional digital mammography and MR imaging in women with known breast carcinoma.
    Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Heerdt AS; Thornton C; Moskowitz CS; Ferrara J; Morris EA
    Radiology; 2013 Mar; 266(3):743-51. PubMed ID: 23220903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced mammography.
    Travieso Aja MM; Rodríguez Rodríguez M; Alayón Hernández S; Vega Benítez V; Luzardo OP
    Radiologia; 2014; 56(5):390-9. PubMed ID: 25086679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical experience.
    Jong RA; Yaffe MJ; Skarpathiotakis M; Shumak RS; Danjoux NM; Gunesekara A; Plewes DB
    Radiology; 2003 Sep; 228(3):842-50. PubMed ID: 12881585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Use of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography for intramammary cancer staging: preliminary results.
    Blum KS; Rubbert C; Mathys B; Antoch G; Mohrmann S; Obenauer S
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1363-9. PubMed ID: 25127846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dual-energy subtraction mammography.
    Asaga T; Masuzawa C; Yoshida A; Matsuura H
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):70-3. PubMed ID: 7734544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis--a feasibility study.
    Carton AK; Gavenonis SC; Currivan JA; Conant EF; Schnall MD; Maidment AD
    Br J Radiol; 2010 Apr; 83(988):344-50. PubMed ID: 19505964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: an emerging new tool in the clinician's arsenal.
    Keller BM
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Nov; 21(11):1361-2. PubMed ID: 25300719
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Identification and Avoidance of Vessels During Imaging Guided Biopsies: An Additional Role of Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Mesurolle B; Brun F; El Khoury M; Pétrou A; Bagard C; Monghal C; Travade A
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2017 Nov; 68(4):468-470. PubMed ID: 28942947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography in the Surgical Management of Breast Cancer.
    Ali-Mucheru M; Pockaj B; Patel B; Pizzitola V; Wasif N; Stucky CC; Gray R
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Dec; 23(Suppl 5):649-655. PubMed ID: 27638679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between breast MRI and contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.
    Łuczyńska E; Heinze-Paluchowska S; Hendrick E; Dyczek S; Ryś J; Herman K; Blecharz P; Jakubowicz J
    Med Sci Monit; 2015 May; 21():1358-67. PubMed ID: 25963880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.
    Dromain C; Thibault F; Muller S; Rimareix F; Delaloge S; Tardivon A; Balleyguier C
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 20839001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Low energy mammogram obtained in contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) is comparable to routine full-field digital mammography (FFDM).
    Francescone MA; Jochelson MS; Dershaw DD; Sung JS; Hughes MC; Zheng J; Moskowitz C; Morris EA
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Aug; 83(8):1350-5. PubMed ID: 24932846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer in Women With Breast Augmentation: Preliminary Findings.
    Carnahan MB; Pockaj B; Pizzitola V; Giurescu ME; Lorans R; Eversman W; Sharpe RE; Cronin P; Patel BK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Oct; 217(4):855-856. PubMed ID: 33728971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Role of preoperative breast dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography in ductal carcinoma in situ.
    Vignoli C; Bicchierai G; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Miele V; Cirone D; Nori J
    Breast J; 2019 Sep; 25(5):1034-1036. PubMed ID: 31237740
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Contrast-enhanced Mammography: Current Applications and Future Directions.
    Ghaderi KF; Phillips J; Perry H; Lotfi P; Mehta TS
    Radiographics; 2019; 39(7):1907-1920. PubMed ID: 31697627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of tumor angiogenesis of breast carcinoma using contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Dromain C; Balleyguier C; Muller S; Mathieu MC; Rochard F; Opolon P; Sigal R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Nov; 187(5):W528-37. PubMed ID: 17056886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.