These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
506 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24582021)
1. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 2: attractiveness of the frontal facial smile in extraction and nonextraction outcomes. Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Mar; 145(3):296-304. PubMed ID: 24582021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Part 1: differences between premolar extraction and nonextraction treatment outcomes. Meyer AH; Woods MG; Manton DJ Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Feb; 145(2):207-16. PubMed ID: 24485736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Role of buccal corridor in smile esthetics and its correlation with underlying skeletal and dental structures. Tikku T; Khanna R; Maurya RP; Ahmad N Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):187-94. PubMed ID: 22945708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of buccal corridor spaces and arch form on smile esthetics. Roden-Johnson D; Gallerano R; English J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Mar; 127(3):343-50. PubMed ID: 15775949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Influence of maxillary canine gingival margin asymmetries on the perception of smile esthetics among orthodontists and laypersons. Correa BD; Vieira Bittencourt MA; Machado AW Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Jan; 145(1):55-63. PubMed ID: 24373655 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of buccal corridors on smile esthetics in Japanese and Korean orthodontists and orthodontic patients. Ioi H; Kang S; Shimomura T; Kim SS; Park SB; Son WS; Takahashi I Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):459-65. PubMed ID: 22999668 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of nonextraction and extraction orthodontic treatments on smile esthetics for different malocclusions. Cheng HC; Wang YC Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Jan; 153(1):81-86. PubMed ID: 29287659 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Smile attractiveness in patients with Class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions treated with different tooth extraction protocols. Janson G; Branco NC; Morais JF; Freitas MR Eur J Orthod; 2014 Feb; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 21771805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Extraction of maxillary canines: Esthetic perceptions of patient smiles among dental professionals and laypeople. Thiruvenkatachari B; Javidi H; Griffiths SE; Shah AA; Sandler J Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Oct; 152(4):509-515. PubMed ID: 28962736 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of buccolingual inclinations of maxillary canines and premolars on perceived smile attractiveness. Xu H; Han X; Wang Y; Shu R; Jing Y; Tian Y; Andrews WA; Andrews LF; Bai D Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Feb; 147(2):182-9. PubMed ID: 25636551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Buccal corridors and smile esthetics. Moore T; Southard KA; Casko JS; Qian F; Southard TE Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Feb; 127(2):208-13; quiz 261. PubMed ID: 15750540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Do long-term changes in relative maxillary arch width affect buccal-corridor ratios in extraction and nonextraction treatment? Akyalcin S; Erdinc AE; Dincer B; Nanda RS Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Mar; 139(3):356-61. PubMed ID: 21392691 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Changes in smile parameters as perceived by orthodontists, dentists, artists, and laypeople. Gul-e-Erum ; Fida M World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):132-40. PubMed ID: 18575307 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attractiveness of variations in the smile arc and buccal corridor space as judged by orthodontists and laymen. Parekh SM; Fields HW; Beck M; Rosenstiel S Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 16808559 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Characterization of posed smile by using visual analog scale, smile arc, buccal corridor measures, and modified smile index. Krishnan V; Daniel ST; Lazar D; Asok A Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Apr; 133(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 18405815 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Smile esthetics: perception and comparison of treated and untreated smiles. Işiksal E; Hazar S; Akyalçin S Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Jan; 129(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 16443472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Maxillary arch width and buccal corridor changes with orthodontic treatment. Yan Y; Tian Z Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Aug; 146(2):135-6. PubMed ID: 25085288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Extraction vs nonextraction: arch widths and smile esthetics. Kim E; Gianelly AA Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):354-8. PubMed ID: 12940554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effect of extraction of first four premolars on smile aesthetics. Ghaffar F; Fida M Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):679-83. PubMed ID: 21228117 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of the gingival display on posed smile with different facial forms: a comparison of dentists and patients concepts. Akhare PJ; Daga A Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(5):568-73. PubMed ID: 23422598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]