398 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24582042)
1. Coronary stent evaluation with coronary computed tomographic angiography: comparison between low-osmolar, high-iodine concentration iomeprol-400 and iso-osmolar, lower-iodine concentration iodixanol-320.
Andreini D; Pontone G; Mushtaq S; Bartorelli AL; Conte E; Bertella E; Baggiano A; Annoni A; Formenti A; Ballerini G; Agostoni P; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2014; 8(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 24582042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Coronary computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery bypass grafts: comparison between low-concentration Iodixanol 270 and Iohexol 350.
Wang H; Xu L; Zhang N; Fan Z; Zhang Z; Sun Z
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(1):112-8. PubMed ID: 25299799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter comparison of high concentration contrast agent iomeprol-400 with iso-osmolar iodixanol-320: contrast enhancement and heart rate variation in coronary dual-source computed tomographic angiography.
Becker CR; Vanzulli A; Fink C; de Faveri D; Fedeli S; Dore R; Biondetti P; Kuettner A; Krix M; Ascenti G
Invest Radiol; 2011 Jul; 46(7):457-64. PubMed ID: 21577124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of a low-osmolar contrast medium, iopamidol, and an iso-osmolar contrast medium, iodixanol, in MDCT coronary angiography.
Ozbulbul NI; Yurdakul M; Tola M
Coron Artery Dis; 2010 Nov; 21(7):414-9. PubMed ID: 20671550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Heart rate variability and heat sensation during CT coronary angiography: Low-osmolar versus iso-osmolar contrast media.
Svensson A; Ripsweden J; Rück A; Aspelin P; Cederlund K; Brismar BT
Acta Radiol; 2010 Sep; 51(7):722-6. PubMed ID: 20568977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of the effect of low- and iso-osmolar contrast agents on heart rate during chest CT angiography: results of a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Chartrand-Lefebvre C; White CS; Bhalla S; Mayo-Smith WW; Prenovault J; Vydareny KH; Soto JA; Ozkan OS; Chughtai AR; Soulez G
Radiology; 2011 Mar; 258(3):930-7. PubMed ID: 21212367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Influence of Contrast Agent's Osmolarity on Iodine Delivery Protocol in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography: Comparison Between Iso-Osmolar Iodixanol-320 and Low-Osmolar Iomeprol-370.
Yang X; Huang W; Liu W; Zhu Y; Xu Y; Yang G; Tang L; Zhu X
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2018; 42(1):62-67. PubMed ID: 28708716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Coronary CT angiography with 80 kV tube voltage and low iodine concentration contrast agent in patients with low body weight.
Andreini D; Mushtaq S; Conte E; Segurini C; Guglielmo M; Petullà M; Volpato V; Annoni A; Baggiano A; Formenti A; Bartorelli AL; Fiorentini C; Pepi M
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2016; 10(4):322-6. PubMed ID: 27357327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. MDCT angiography for detection of pulmonary emboli: comparison between equi-iodine doses of iomeprol 400 mgI/mL and iodixanol 320 mgI/mL.
Langenberger H; Friedrich K; Plank C; Matzek W; Wolf F; Storto ML; Schaefer-Prokop C; Herold C
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jun; 70(3):579-88. PubMed ID: 18384995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low-concentration contrast medium for 128-slice dual-source CT coronary angiography at a very low radiation dose using prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition.
Zheng M; Wu Y; Wei M; Liu Y; Zhao H; Li J
Acad Radiol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):195-202. PubMed ID: 25457735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the efficacy and safety of iopamidol-370 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing multidetector-row computed tomography.
Sahani DV; Soulez G; Chen KM; Lepanto L; Xu JR; Nelson RC; Grazioli L; Vanzulli A; Heiken JP;
Invest Radiol; 2007 Dec; 42(12):856-61. PubMed ID: 18007158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contrast injection protocols for coronary computed tomography angiography using a 64-detector scanner: comparison between patient weight-adjusted- and fixed iodine-dose protocols.
Nakaura T; Awai K; Yauaga Y; Nakayama Y; Oda S; Hatemura M; Nagayoshi Y; Ogawa H; Yamashita Y
Invest Radiol; 2008 Jul; 43(7):512-9. PubMed ID: 18580334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic Accuracy, Image Quality, and Patient Comfort for Coronary CT Angiography Performed Using Iso-Osmolar versus Low-Osmolar Iodinated Contrast: A Prospective International Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.
Nakazato R; Arsanjani R; Shalev A; Leipsic JA; Gransar H; Lin FY; Gomez M; Berman DS; Min JK
Acad Radiol; 2016 Jun; 23(6):743-51. PubMed ID: 27178781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of non-ionic iodinated contrast media on patient heart rate and pressures during intra-cardiac or intra-arterial injection.
Schmid I; Didier D; Pfammatter T; Garachemani A; Fleisch M; Kirchin MA; Meier B
Int J Cardiol; 2007 Jun; 118(3):389-96. PubMed ID: 17376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Comparison of low- and high-concentration (270 and 320 mg I/ml) iso-osmolar iodinated contrast media in coronary CT angiography: a randomized prospective single-center blinded study].
Sinitsyn VE; Komarova MA; Mershina EA
Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2014; (4):5-12. PubMed ID: 25775881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Noninvasive quantitative evaluation of coronary artery stent patency using 64-row multidetector computed tomography.
Abdelkarim MJ; Ahmadi N; Gopal A; Hamirani Y; Karlsberg RP; Budoff MJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2010; 4(1):29-37. PubMed ID: 20159625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Stent evaluation by coronary computed tomography angiography: a comparison between Iopamidol-370 and Ioversol-320 hypo-osmolar iodine concentration contrasts.
Garcia AM; Assunção-Jr AN; Dantas-Jr RN; Parga JR; Ganem F
Br J Radiol; 2020 Nov; 93(1115):20200078. PubMed ID: 32816561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of reduced x-ray tube voltage, low iodine concentration contrast medium, and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction on image quality and radiation dose at coronary CT angiography: results of the prospective multicenter REALISE trial.
Yin WH; Lu B; Gao JB; Li PL; Sun K; Wu ZF; Yang WJ; Zhang XQ; Zheng MW; McQuiston AD; Meinel FG; Schoepf UJ
J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(3):215-24. PubMed ID: 25843243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Image quality and attenuation values of multidetector CT coronary angiography using high iodine-concentration contrast material: a comparison of the use of iopromide 370 and iomeprol 400.
Kim EY; Yeh DW; Choe YH; Lee WJ; Lim HK
Acta Radiol; 2010 Nov; 51(9):982-9. PubMed ID: 20849317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Enhancement and safety of iomeprol-400 and iodixanol-320 in patients undergoing abdominal multidetector CT.
Romano L; Grazioli L; Bonomo L; Xu JR; Chen KM; Dore R; Vanzulli A; Catalano C
Br J Radiol; 2009 Mar; 82(975):204-11. PubMed ID: 19064592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
