These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24582236)

  • 1. The influence of bone quality on the biomechanical behavior of full-arch implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Faverani LP; Barão VA; Ramalho-Ferreira G; Delben JA; Ferreira MB; Garcia Júnior IR; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Apr; 37():164-70. PubMed ID: 24582236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of different designs of implant-retained overdentures and fixed full-arch implant-supported prosthesis on stress distribution in edentulous mandible--a computed tomography-based three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Barão VA; Delben JA; Lima J; Cabral T; Assunção WG
    J Biomech; 2013 Apr; 46(7):1312-20. PubMed ID: 23518207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of superstructure material on the stress distribution in mandibular full-arch implant-supported fixed dentures. A CT-based 3D-FEA.
    Ferreira MB; Barão VA; Faverani LP; Hipólito AC; Assunção WG
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2014 Feb; 35():92-9. PubMed ID: 24411356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical comparison of axial and tilted implants for mandibular full-arch fixed prostheses.
    Kim KS; Kim YL; Bae JM; Cho HW
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(5):976-84. PubMed ID: 22010079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of the rigidity of a provisional restoration supported on four immediately loaded implants in the edentulous maxilla on biomechanical bone-implant interactions under simulated bruxism conditions: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Yamaguchi K; Ishiura Y; Tanaka S; Baba K
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):442-50. PubMed ID: 25191887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Biomechanical Analysis of Different Framework Design, Framework Material and Bone Density in the Edentulous Mandible With Fixed Implant-Supported Prostheses: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Study.
    Yu W; Chen S; Ma L; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Apr; 32(4):309-317. PubMed ID: 35546271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of different implant configurations for a mandibular fixed prosthesis.
    Fazi G; Tellini S; Vangi D; Branchi R
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):752-9. PubMed ID: 21841984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Implant-Supported Fixed Partial Prostheses With Different Prosthetic Materials: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Stress Analysis.
    Arinc H
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):303-310. PubMed ID: 29517641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical evaluation of tooth- and implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with various nonrigid connector positions: a finite element analysis.
    Burak Özcelik T; Ersoy E; Yilmaz B
    J Prosthodont; 2011 Jan; 20(1):16-28. PubMed ID: 21251117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Straight and angulated abutments in platform switching: influence of loading on bone stress by three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Martini AP; Freitas AC; Rocha EP; de Almeida EO; Anchieta RB; Kina S; Fasolo GB
    J Craniofac Surg; 2012 Mar; 23(2):415-8. PubMed ID: 22421854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Implant-bone load transfer mechanisms in complete-arch prostheses supported by four implants: a three-dimensional finite element approach.
    Baggi L; Pastore S; Di Girolamo M; Vairo G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Jan; 109(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 23328192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Tilted or parallel implant placement in the completely edentulous mandible? A three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Naini RB; Nokar S; Borghei H; Alikhasi M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):776-81. PubMed ID: 21841987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of vertical and angular misfit in implant-supported fixed prostheses.
    Assunção WG; Gomes EA; Rocha EP; Delben JA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2011; 26(4):788-96. PubMed ID: 21841989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison between all-on-four and all-on-six treatment concepts and framework material on stress distribution in atrophic maxilla: A prototyping guided 3D-FEA study.
    Bhering CL; Mesquita MF; Kemmoku DT; Noritomi PY; Consani RL; Barão VA
    Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl; 2016 Dec; 69():715-25. PubMed ID: 27612765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Influence of the interforaminal arch form of edentulous mandibles on design of "All-on-4": preliminary research based on conebeam computed tomography].
    Li SY; Li G; Feng HL; Pan SX
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2017 Aug; 49(4):699-703. PubMed ID: 28816291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Numerical study of the influence of material parameters on the mechanical behaviour of a rehabilitated edentulous mandible.
    Favot LM; Berry-Kromer V; Haboussi M; Thiebaud F; Ben Zineb T
    J Dent; 2014 Mar; 42(3):287-97. PubMed ID: 24321295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomechanical comparison of implant inclinations and load times with the all-on-4 treatment concept: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Liu T; Mu Z; Yu T; Wang C; Huang Y
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2019 May; 22(6):585-594. PubMed ID: 30821483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The biomechanical analysis of simulating implants in function under osteoporotic jawbone by comparing cylindrical, apical tapered, neck tapered, and expandable type implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Xiao JR; Li YF; Guan SM; Song L; Xu LX; Kong L
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Jul; 69(7):e273-81. PubMed ID: 21367505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Comparative Analysis on Two Types of Oral Implants, Bone-Level and Tissue-Level, with Different Cantilever Lengths of Fixed Prosthesis.
    Mosavar A; Nili M; Hashemi SR; Kadkhodaei M
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Jun; 26(4):289-295. PubMed ID: 26662575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical Behavior of Tooth-Implant Supported Prostheses With Different Implant Connections: A Nonlinear Finite Element Analysis.
    de Paula GA; Silva GC; Vilaça ÊL; Cornacchia TM; de Magalhães CS; Moreira AN
    Implant Dent; 2018 Jun; 27(3):294-302. PubMed ID: 29521677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.