These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

301 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24582469)

  • 21. Aftereffects of 2 noninvasive brain stimulation techniques on corticospinal excitability in persons with chronic stroke: a pilot study.
    Goh HT; Chan HY; Abdul-Latif L
    J Neurol Phys Ther; 2015 Jan; 39(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 25427033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation.
    Dyke K; Kim S; Jackson GM; Jackson SR
    Brain Stimul; 2016; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Anodal transcranial pulsed current stimulation: A novel technique to enhance corticospinal excitability.
    Jaberzadeh S; Bastani A; Zoghi M
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2014 Feb; 125(2):344-51. PubMed ID: 24074626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inter- and Intra-individual Variability in Response to Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) at Varying Current Intensities.
    Chew T; Ho KA; Loo CK
    Brain Stimul; 2015; 8(6):1130-7. PubMed ID: 26294061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Facilitation of corticospinal excitability by virtual reality exercise following anodal transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy volunteers and subacute stroke subjects.
    Kim YJ; Ku J; Cho S; Kim HJ; Cho YK; Lim T; Kang YJ
    J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2014 Aug; 11():124. PubMed ID: 25135003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Bergmann TO; Groppa S; Seeger M; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 102(4):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19692511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Somatosensory and transcranial direct current stimulation effects on manual dexterity and motor cortex function: A metaplasticity study.
    Trudgen A; Cirillo J; Byblow WD
    Brain Stimul; 2019; 12(4):938-947. PubMed ID: 30850217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Bidirectional variability in motor cortex excitability modulation following 1 mA transcranial direct current stimulation in healthy participants.
    Strube W; Bunse T; Nitsche MA; Nikolaeva A; Palm U; Padberg F; Falkai P; Hasan A
    Physiol Rep; 2016 Aug; 4(15):. PubMed ID: 27495298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Resting state functional connectivity measures correlate with the response to anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
    Hordacre B; Moezzi B; Goldsworthy MR; Rogasch NC; Graetz LJ; Ridding MC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 45(6):837-845. PubMed ID: 27992103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of bi-hemispheric M1-M1 transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex neurophysiology and metabolite concentration.
    Tremblay S; Lafleur LP; Proulx S; Beaulé V; Latulipe-Loiselle A; Doyon J; Marjańska M; Théoret H
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2016 May; 34(4):587-602. PubMed ID: 27232951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used.
    Azabou E; Roche N; Sharshar T; Bussel B; Lofaso F; Petitjean M
    Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Oct; 189(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 23933029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Probing the relevance of repeated cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex for prolongation of after-effects.
    Mosayebi Samani M; Agboada D; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    J Physiol; 2020 Feb; 598(4):805-816. PubMed ID: 31714998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Titrating the neuroplastic effects of cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the primary motor cortex.
    Mosayebi Samani M; Agboada D; Jamil A; Kuo MF; Nitsche MA
    Cortex; 2019 Oct; 119():350-361. PubMed ID: 31195316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Safety and effects on motor cortex excitability of five cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation sessions in 25hours.
    Zappasodi F; Musumeci G; Navarra R; Di Lazzaro V; Caulo M; Uncini A
    Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr; 48(2):77-87. PubMed ID: 29248201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions.
    Horvath JC; Vogrin SJ; Carter O; Cook MJ; Forte JD
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Anodal Transcranial Pulsed Current Stimulation: The Effects of Pulse Duration on Corticospinal Excitability.
    Jaberzadeh S; Bastani A; Zoghi M; Morgan P; Fitzgerald PB
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(7):e0131779. PubMed ID: 26177541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does cerebellar non-invasive brain stimulation affect corticospinal excitability in healthy individuals? A systematic review of literature and meta-analysis.
    Behrangrad S; Zoghi M; Kidgell D; Jaberzadeh S
    Neurosci Lett; 2019 Jul; 706():128-139. PubMed ID: 31102706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Multisession anodal transcranial direct current stimulation induces motor cortex plasticity enhancement and motor learning generalization in an aging population.
    Dumel G; Bourassa MÈ; Charlebois-Plante C; Desjardins M; Doyon J; Saint-Amour D; De Beaumont L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Feb; 129(2):494-502. PubMed ID: 29223355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation increases corticospinal excitability, while performance is unchanged.
    Kristiansen M; Thomsen MJ; Nørgaard J; Aaes J; Knudsen D; Voigt M
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254888. PubMed ID: 34270614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
    Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.