These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24582768)

  • 1. Running the figure to the ground: figure-ground segmentation during visual search.
    Ralph BC; Seli P; Cheng VO; Solman GJ; Smilek D
    Vision Res; 2014 Apr; 97():65-73. PubMed ID: 24582768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Remembered but unused: the accessory items in working memory that do not guide attention.
    Peters JC; Goebel R; Roelfsema PR
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Jun; 21(6):1081-91. PubMed ID: 18702589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The target effect: visual memory for unnamed search targets.
    Thomas MD; Williams CC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(11):2090-104. PubMed ID: 24684498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials.
    Ohkita M; Obayashi Y; Jitsumori M
    Vision Res; 2014 Mar; 96():96-105. PubMed ID: 24486515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Scene context guides eye movements during visual search.
    Neider MB; Zelinsky GJ
    Vision Res; 2006 Mar; 46(5):614-21. PubMed ID: 16236336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Congruency effects in the remote distractor paradigm: evidence for top-down modulation.
    Born S; Kerzel D
    J Vis; 2009 Aug; 9(9):3.1-13. PubMed ID: 19761336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Figure-ground segmentation can occur without attention.
    Kimchi R; Peterson MA
    Psychol Sci; 2008 Jul; 19(7):660-8. PubMed ID: 18727781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.
    Kumada T
    Vision Res; 2010 Jun; 50(14):1402-13. PubMed ID: 20025896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrophysiological evidence of semantic interference in visual search.
    Telling AL; Kumar S; Meyer AS; Humphreys GW
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 22(10):2212-25. PubMed ID: 19803680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The interplay of bottom-up and top-down mechanisms in visual guidance during object naming.
    Coco MI; Malcolm GL; Keller F
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(6):1096-120. PubMed ID: 24224949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The spatial impact of visual distractors on saccade latency.
    McSorley E; McCloy R; Lyne C
    Vision Res; 2012 May; 60():61-72. PubMed ID: 22469779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The neural correlates of perceptual load induced attentional selection: an fMRI study.
    Wei P; Szameitat AJ; Müller HJ; Schubert T; Zhou X
    Neuroscience; 2013 Oct; 250():372-80. PubMed ID: 23876324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implicit object naming in visual search: Evidence from phonological competition.
    Walenchok SC; Hout MC; Goldinger SD
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2016 Nov; 78(8):2633-2654. PubMed ID: 27531018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.
    Horstmann G; Ernst D; Becker S
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jul; 198():102859. PubMed ID: 31212105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Saccadic context indicates information processing within visual fixations: evidence from event-related potentials and eye-movements analysis of the distractor effect.
    Graupner ST; Pannasch S; Velichkovsky BM
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Apr; 80(1):54-62. PubMed ID: 21291920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conflict-induced perceptual filtering.
    Wendt M; Luna-Rodriguez A; Jacobsen T
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2012 Jun; 38(3):675-86. PubMed ID: 22004199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual search performance among persons with schizophrenia as a function of target eccentricity.
    Elahipanah A; Christensen BK; Reingold EM
    Neuropsychology; 2010 Mar; 24(2):192-8. PubMed ID: 20230113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue.
    Schmidt J; Zelinsky GJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):1904-14. PubMed ID: 19459137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multiple cues add up in defining a figure on a ground.
    Devinck F; Spillmann L
    Vision Res; 2013 Jan; 77():51-8. PubMed ID: 23201562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.