184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24583615)
1. Randomized controlled trial of the shang ring versus conventional surgical techniques for adult male circumcision: safety and acceptability.
Sokal DC; Li PS; Zulu R; Awori QD; Combes SL; Simba RO; Lee R; Hart C; Perchal P; Hawry HJ; Bowa K; Goldstein M; Barone MA
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2014 Apr; 65(4):447-55. PubMed ID: 24583615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Shang Ring device for adult male circumcision: a proof of concept study in Kenya.
Barone MA; Ndede F; Li PS; Masson P; Awori Q; Okech J; Cherutich P; Muraguri N; Perchal P; Lee R; Kim HH; Goldstein M
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2011 May; 57(1):e7-12. PubMed ID: 21346586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment.
Barone MA; Awori QD; Li PS; Simba RO; Weaver MA; Okech JO; Aduda AO; Cherutich P; Muraguri N; Wekesa JM; Nyanchoka J; Perchal P; Masson P; Lee R; Goldstein M; Kioko J; Lusi O; Sokal DC
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2012 Jul; 60(3):e82-9. PubMed ID: 22343180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review.
Barone MA; Li PS; Awori QD; Lee R; Goldstein M
Transl Androl Urol; 2014 Mar; 3(1):113-24. PubMed ID: 26816759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.
Kigozi G; Musoke R; Watya S; Kighoma N; Ssebbowa P; Serwadda D; Nalugoda F; Makumbi F; Li P; Lee R; Goldstein M; Wawer M; Sewankambo N; Gray RH
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Aug; 63(5):617-21. PubMed ID: 23614991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Shang Ring, sleeve and conventional circumcisions for redundant prepuce and phimosis: A comparative study of 918 cases].
Wang R; Chen WJ; Shi WH; Xue YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Apr; 19(4):332-6. PubMed ID: 23678713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Field study of adult male circumcision using the ShangRing in routine clinical settings in Kenya and Zambia.
Sokal DC; Li PS; Zulu R; Awori QD; Agot K; Simba RO; Combes S; Lee RK; Hart C; Lai JJ; Zyambo Z; Goldstein M; Feldblum PJ; Barone MA
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2014 Dec; 67(4):430-7. PubMed ID: 25162816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Progress in the clinical studies of male circumcision using the Shang Ring].
Lü NQ; Li PS; Sokal D; Cheng Y; Peng YF; Barone M; Huang YR; Goldstein M
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2011 Mar; 17(3):195-202. PubMed ID: 21485538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional surgical procedures: comparison of clinical effectiveness].
Li HN; Xu J; Qu LM
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2010 Apr; 16(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 20626160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [A recommendable standard protocol of adult male circumcision with the Chinese Shang Ring: outcomes of 328 cases in China].
Cheng Y; Peng YF; Liu YD; Tian L; Lü NQ; Su XJ; Yan ZJ; Hu JS; Lee R; Kim HH; Sokal DC; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2009 Jul; 15(7):584-92. PubMed ID: 19694369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Clinical studies of shang ring male circumcision in China and Africa].
Cheng F; Lü NQ; Xu HQ; Barone MA; Lee R; Goldstein M; Li PS
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Apr; 20(4):291-8. PubMed ID: 24873152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Novel no-flip Shang Ring circumcision for adult males: a clinical application study of 528 cases].
Yang BH; Jia C; Liu T; Peng YF
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2014 Aug; 20(8):709-14. PubMed ID: 25195367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Disposable circumcision suture device: clinical effect and patient satisfaction.
Lv BD; Zhang SG; Zhu XW; Zhang J; Chen G; Chen MF; Shen HL; Pei ZJ; Chen ZD
Asian J Androl; 2014; 16(3):453-6. PubMed ID: 24759586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized clinical study of circumcision with a ring device versus conventional circumcision.
Yue C; Ze-Jun Y; Wu KR; Su XJ; Hu JS; Ma JW; Guo CM; Fang HW; Su R; Zhang Y; Zhang QH
J Urol; 2012 Nov; 188(5):1849-54. PubMed ID: 22999700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing direct costs of facility-based Shang Ring provision versus a standard surgical technique for voluntary medical male circumcision in Zambia.
Bratt JH; Zyambo Z
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Jul; 63(3):e109-12. PubMed ID: 23481667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Shang Ring circumcision versus conventional circumcision for redundant prepuce or phimosis: a meta analysis].
Xiao EL; Ding H; Li YQ; Wang ZP
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2013 Oct; 19(10):935-9. PubMed ID: 24218951
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [A new device for removing Shang ring after circumcision ( a report of 257 cases)].
Zhang JQ; Liu JH; Jin LC; Tian L; Zhang JH; Wang Y; Zhang XD
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Apr; 96(14):1128-30. PubMed ID: 27095783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A systematic review and meta-analysis of circumcision with Shang Ring vs conventional circumcision.
Cao D; Liu L; Hu Y; Wang J; Yuan J; Dong Q; Wei Q
Urology; 2015 Apr; 85(4):799-804. PubMed ID: 25711156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Use of topical versus injectable anaesthesia for ShangRing circumcisions in men and boys in Kenya: Results from a randomized controlled trial.
Awori Q; Li PS; Lee RK; Ouma D; Oundo M; Barasa M; Obura N; Mwamkita D; Simba R; Oketch J; Nyangweso N; Maina M; Kiswi N; Kirui M; Chirchir B; Goldstein M; Barone MA
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0218066. PubMed ID: 31412032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Shang Ring versus forceps-guided adult male circumcision: a randomized, controlled effectiveness study in southwestern Uganda.
Kanyago S; Riding DM; Mutakooha E; Lopez de la O A; Siedner MJ
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr; 2013 Oct; 64(2):130-3. PubMed ID: 23599013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
