These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24586358)

  • 41. Back view of beauty: a bias in attractiveness judgment.
    Yonemura K; Ono F; Watanabe K
    Perception; 2013; 42(1):95-102. PubMed ID: 23678619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Acoustic Features of Transfeminine Voices and Perceptions of Voice Femininity.
    Dahl KL; Mahler LA
    J Voice; 2020 Nov; 34(6):961.e19-961.e26. PubMed ID: 31202525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Acoustic and Auditory Perception Effects of the Voice Therapy Technique Finger Kazoo in Adult Women.
    Christmann MK; Cielo CA
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):390.e9-390.e15. PubMed ID: 27839707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Continuous Vocal Fry Simulated in Laboratory Subjects: A Preliminary Report on Voice Production and Listener Ratings.
    Venkatraman A; Sivasankar MP
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov; 27(4):1539-1545. PubMed ID: 30178028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Acoustic and perceptual appraisal of vocal gestures in the female classical voice.
    Kenny DT; Mitchell HF
    J Voice; 2006 Mar; 20(1):55-70. PubMed ID: 15925482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. An Acoustic-Signal-Based Preventive Program for University Lecturers' Vocal Health.
    Paniagua MS; Pérez CJ; Calle-Alonso F; Salazar C
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 30072204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Analysis of vocal fold function from acoustic data simultaneously recorded with high-speed endoscopy.
    Döllinger M; Kunduk M; Kaltenbacher M; Vondenhoff S; Ziethe A; Eysholdt U; Bohr C
    J Voice; 2012 Nov; 26(6):726-33. PubMed ID: 22632795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Male Vocal Quality and Its Relation to Females' Preferences.
    Suire A; Raymond M; Barkat-Defradas M
    Evol Psychol; 2019; 17(3):1474704919874675. PubMed ID: 31564128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Perceptions of human attractiveness comprising face and voice cues.
    Wells T; Baguley T; Sergeant M; Dunn A
    Arch Sex Behav; 2013 Jul; 42(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 23358855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Implicitly perceived vocal attractiveness modulates prefrontal cortex activity.
    Bestelmeyer PE; Latinus M; Bruckert L; Rouger J; Crabbe F; Belin P
    Cereb Cortex; 2012 Jun; 22(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21828348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Singers' phonation threshold pressure and ratings of self-perceived effort on vocal tasks.
    McHenry M; Evans J; Powitzky E
    J Voice; 2013 May; 27(3):295-8. PubMed ID: 23462685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Perceptual and Acoustic Analyses of Good Voice Quality in Male Radio Performers.
    Warhurst S; Madill C; McCabe P; Ternström S; Yiu E; Heard R
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):259.e1-259.e12. PubMed ID: 27342753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Acoustic characteristics of perceived versus actual vocal age in controlled phonation by adult females.
    Linville SE; Fisher HB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Jul; 78(1 Pt 1):40-8. PubMed ID: 4019906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Immediate Effect of Stimulability Assessment on Acoustic, Aerodynamic, and Patient-Perceptual Measures of Voice.
    Gillespie AI; Gartner-Schmidt J
    J Voice; 2016 Jul; 30(4):507.e9-507.e14. PubMed ID: 26233832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV; De Bodt M; Gerrits E; Maryn Y
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Objective Acoustic Quantification of Perceived Voice Tremor Severity.
    Maryn Y; Leblans M; Zarowski A; Barkmeier-Kraemer J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 Oct; 62(10):3689-3705. PubMed ID: 31619112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Interaction of Surface Hydration and Vocal Loading on Voice Measures.
    Fujiki RB; Chapleau A; Sundarrajan A; McKenna V; Sivasankar MP
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):211-217. PubMed ID: 27522343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Different Vocal Parameters Predict Perceptions of Dominance and Attractiveness.
    Hodges-Simeon CR; Gaulin SJ; Puts DA
    Hum Nat; 2010 Dec; 21(4):406-427. PubMed ID: 21212816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Differentiated vocal tract control and the reliability of interpretations of nasendoscopic assessment.
    Madill C; Sheard C; Heard R
    J Voice; 2010 May; 24(3):337-45. PubMed ID: 19660904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Speech Adjustments for Room Acoustics and Their Effects on Vocal Effort.
    Bottalico P
    J Voice; 2017 May; 31(3):392.e1-392.e12. PubMed ID: 28029555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.