364 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24586470)
1. The impact of different DNA extraction kits and laboratories upon the assessment of human gut microbiota composition by 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
Kennedy NA; Walker AW; Berry SH; Duncan SH; Farquarson FM; Louis P; Thomson JM; ; Satsangi J; Flint HJ; Parkhill J; Lees CW; Hold GL
PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e88982. PubMed ID: 24586470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A low-cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling.
Bollmann-Giolai A; Giolai M; Heavens D; Macaulay I; Malone J; Clark MD
Microbiologyopen; 2020 Dec; 9(12):e1133. PubMed ID: 33225533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of DNA extraction kits for PCR-DGGE analysis of human intestinal microbial communities from fecal specimens.
Ariefdjohan MW; Savaiano DA; Nakatsu CH
Nutr J; 2010 May; 9():23. PubMed ID: 20492702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Commercial DNA extraction kits impact observed microbial community composition in permafrost samples.
Vishnivetskaya TA; Layton AC; Lau MC; Chauhan A; Cheng KR; Meyers AJ; Murphy JR; Rogers AW; Saarunya GS; Williams DE; Pfiffner SM; Biggerstaff JP; Stackhouse BT; Phelps TJ; Whyte L; Sayler GS; Onstott TC
FEMS Microbiol Ecol; 2014 Jan; 87(1):217-30. PubMed ID: 24102625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of Methods for the Extraction of Microbial DNA From Vaginal Swabs Used for Microbiome Studies.
Mattei V; Murugesan S; Al Hashmi M; Mathew R; James N; Singh P; Kumar M; Lakshmanan AP; Terranegra A; Al Khodor S; Tomei S
Front Cell Infect Microbiol; 2019; 9():197. PubMed ID: 31245304
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. DNA extraction method influences human milk bacterial profiles.
Cheema AS; Stinson LF; Lai CT; Geddes DT; Payne MS
J Appl Microbiol; 2021 Jan; 130(1):142-156. PubMed ID: 32654260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for isolation and purification of bacterial and eukaryotic DNA from PAH-contaminated soils.
Mahmoudi N; Slater GF; Fulthorpe RR
Can J Microbiol; 2011 Aug; 57(8):623-8. PubMed ID: 21815819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of DNA extraction, sample dilution, and reagent contamination on 16S rRNA gene sequencing of human feces.
Velásquez-Mejía EP; de la Cuesta-Zuluaga J; Escobar JS
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2018 Jan; 102(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 29079861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimization of DNA extraction for advancing coral microbiota investigations.
Weber L; DeForce E; Apprill A
Microbiome; 2017 Feb; 5(1):18. PubMed ID: 28179023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Are all faecal bacteria detected with equal efficiency? A study using next-generation sequencing and quantitative culture of infants' faecal samples.
Sjöberg F; Nookaew I; Yazdanshenas S; Gio-Batta M; Adlerberth I; Wold AE
J Microbiol Methods; 2020 Oct; 177():106018. PubMed ID: 32795633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparing Two Common DNA Extraction Kits for the Characterization of Symbiotic Microbial Communities from Ascidian Tissue.
Evans JS; López-Legentil S; Erwin PM
Microbes Environ; 2018 Dec; 33(4):435-439. PubMed ID: 30487350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. High-throughput DNA sequence analysis reveals stable engraftment of gut microbiota following transplantation of previously frozen fecal bacteria.
Hamilton MJ; Weingarden AR; Unno T; Khoruts A; Sadowsky MJ
Gut Microbes; 2013; 4(2):125-35. PubMed ID: 23333862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of DNA extraction methods for human gut microbial community profiling.
Lim MY; Song EJ; Kim SH; Lee J; Nam YD
Syst Appl Microbiol; 2018 Mar; 41(2):151-157. PubMed ID: 29305057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types.
Abundo MEC; Ngunjiri JM; Taylor KJM; Ji H; Ghorbani A; K C M; Weber BP; Johnson TJ; Lee CW
PLoS One; 2021; 16(1):e0241732. PubMed ID: 33406075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of a modified phenol/chloroform and commercial-kit methods for extracting DNA from horse fecal material.
Janabi AHD; Kerkhof LJ; McGuinness LR; Biddle AS; McKeever KH
J Microbiol Methods; 2016 Oct; 129():14-19. PubMed ID: 27460337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Biases on community structure during DNA extraction of shrimp intestinal microbiota revealed by high-throughput sequencing].
Wen C; He Y; Xue M; Liang H; Dong J
Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao; 2016 Jan; 56(1):130-42. PubMed ID: 27305787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sampling and pyrosequencing methods for characterizing bacterial communities in the human gut using 16S sequence tags.
Wu GD; Lewis JD; Hoffmann C; Chen YY; Knight R; Bittinger K; Hwang J; Chen J; Berkowsky R; Nessel L; Li H; Bushman FD
BMC Microbiol; 2010 Jul; 10():206. PubMed ID: 20673359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Microbial diversity in fecal samples depends on DNA extraction method: easyMag DNA extraction compared to QIAamp DNA stool mini kit extraction.
Mirsepasi H; Persson S; Struve C; Andersen LO; Petersen AM; Krogfelt KA
BMC Res Notes; 2014 Jan; 7():50. PubMed ID: 24447346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gut Microbiota Analysis Results Are Highly Dependent on the 16S rRNA Gene Target Region, Whereas the Impact of DNA Extraction Is Minor.
Rintala A; Pietilä S; Munukka E; Eerola E; Pursiheimo JP; Laiho A; Pekkala S; Huovinen P
J Biomol Tech; 2017 Apr; 28(1):19-30. PubMed ID: 28260999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of Meconium DNA Extraction Methods for Use in Microbiome Studies.
Stinson LF; Keelan JA; Payne MS
Front Microbiol; 2018; 9():270. PubMed ID: 29515550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
