BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24586492)

  • 21. Adaptive top-down suppression of hippocampal activity and the purging of intrusive memories from consciousness.
    Benoit RG; Hulbert JC; Huddleston E; Anderson MC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Jan; 27(1):96-111. PubMed ID: 25100219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Dissociable effects of top-down and bottom-up attention during episodic encoding.
    Uncapher MR; Hutchinson JB; Wagner AD
    J Neurosci; 2011 Aug; 31(35):12613-28. PubMed ID: 21880922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
    de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Distinct frontoparietal networks set the stage for later perceptual identification priming and episodic recognition memory.
    Wimber M; Heinze HJ; Richardson-Klavehn A
    J Neurosci; 2010 Oct; 30(40):13272-80. PubMed ID: 20926653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The inferior parietal lobule and recognition memory: expectancy violation or successful retrieval?
    O'Connor AR; Han S; Dobbins IG
    J Neurosci; 2010 Feb; 30(8):2924-34. PubMed ID: 20181590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Overlapping parietal activity in memory and perception: evidence for the attention to memory model.
    Cabeza R; Mazuz YS; Stokes J; Kragel JE; Woldorff MG; Ciaramelli E; Olson IR; Moscovitch M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Nov; 23(11):3209-17. PubMed ID: 21568633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Probing the neural dynamics of mnemonic representations after the initial consolidation.
    Liu W; Kohn N; Fernández G
    Neuroimage; 2020 Nov; 221():117213. PubMed ID: 32739553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The encoding/retrieval flip: interactions between memory performance and memory stage and relationship to intrinsic cortical networks.
    Huijbers W; Schultz AP; Vannini P; McLaren DG; Wigman SE; Ward AM; Hedden T; Sperling RA
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2013 Jul; 25(7):1163-79. PubMed ID: 23384193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Episodic Memory Retrieval Benefits from a Less Modular Brain Network Organization.
    Westphal AJ; Wang S; Rissman J
    J Neurosci; 2017 Mar; 37(13):3523-3531. PubMed ID: 28242796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Decoding Episodic Retrieval Processes: Frontoparietal and Medial Temporal Lobe Contributions to Free Recall.
    Kragel JE; Polyn SM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2016 Jan; 28(1):125-39. PubMed ID: 26401811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Functional heterogeneity in posterior parietal cortex across attention and episodic memory retrieval.
    Hutchinson JB; Uncapher MR; Weiner KS; Bressler DW; Silver MA; Preston AR; Wagner AD
    Cereb Cortex; 2014 Jan; 24(1):49-66. PubMed ID: 23019246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Comparison of the neural correlates of retrieval success in tests of cued recall and recognition memory.
    Okada K; Vilberg KL; Rugg MD
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2012 Mar; 33(3):523-33. PubMed ID: 21455941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Medial temporal lobe contributions to cued retrieval of items and contexts.
    Hannula DE; Libby LA; Yonelinas AP; Ranganath C
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Oct; 51(12):2322-32. PubMed ID: 23466350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Is the posterior parietal lobe involved in working memory retrieval? Evidence from patients with bilateral parietal lobe damage.
    Berryhill ME; Olson IR
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):1775-86. PubMed ID: 18439630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The neural correlates of context retrieval in false recognition.
    Liu H; Gao Q; Zheng L; Wu Y; Wang C; Weng X; Guo X
    Neuroreport; 2020 Sep; 31(13):966-970. PubMed ID: 32639271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of dorsal versus ventral hippocampal, total hippocampal, and parietal cortex lesions on memory for allocentric distance in rats.
    Long JM; Kesner RP
    Behav Neurosci; 1996 Oct; 110(5):922-32. PubMed ID: 8918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Spatiotemporal pattern of brain electrical activity related to immediate and delayed episodic memory retrieval.
    Rivas-Fernández MÁ; Galdo-Álvarez S; Zurrón M; Díaz F; Lindín M
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2020 Nov; 175():107309. PubMed ID: 32890759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Imagining the future: The core episodic simulation network dissociates as a function of timecourse and the amount of simulated information.
    Thakral PP; Benoit RG; Schacter DL
    Cortex; 2017 May; 90():12-30. PubMed ID: 28324695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evidence that autobiographic memory retrieval does not become independent of the hippocampus: an fMRI study contrasting very recent with remote events.
    Rekkas PV; Constable RT
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2005 Dec; 17(12):1950-61. PubMed ID: 16475281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Identifying task-general effects of stimulus familiarity in the parietal memory network.
    Gilmore AW; Kalinowski SE; Milleville SC; Gotts SJ; Martin A
    Neuropsychologia; 2019 Feb; 124():31-43. PubMed ID: 30610842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 19.