These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24586560)

  • 1. Normalization of RNA-sequencing data from samples with varying mRNA levels.
    Aanes H; Winata C; Moen LF; Østrup O; Mathavan S; Collas P; Rognes T; Aleström P
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(2):e89158. PubMed ID: 24586560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Misuse of RPKM or TPM normalization when comparing across samples and sequencing protocols.
    Zhao S; Ye Z; Stanton R
    RNA; 2020 Aug; 26(8):903-909. PubMed ID: 32284352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of per sample global scaling and per gene normalization methods for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data.
    Li X; Brock GN; Rouchka EC; Cooper NGF; Wu D; O'Toole TE; Gill RS; Eteleeb AM; O'Brien L; Rai SN
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(5):e0176185. PubMed ID: 28459823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data.
    Li P; Piao Y; Shon HS; Ryu KH
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2015 Oct; 16():347. PubMed ID: 26511205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of normalization and differential expression analyses using RNA-Seq data from 726 individual Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lin Y; Golovnina K; Chen ZX; Lee HN; Negron YL; Sultana H; Oliver B; Harbison ST
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Jan; 17():28. PubMed ID: 26732976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of statistical methods for normalization and differential expression in mRNA-Seq experiments.
    Bullard JH; Purdom E; Hansen KD; Dudoit S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2010 Feb; 11():94. PubMed ID: 20167110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Normalization of RNA-Seq data using adaptive trimmed mean with multi-reference.
    Singh V; Kirtipal N; Song B; Lee S
    Brief Bioinform; 2024 Mar; 25(3):. PubMed ID: 38770720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Gene length corrected trimmed mean of M-values (GeTMM) processing of RNA-seq data performs similarly in intersample analyses while improving intrasample comparisons.
    Smid M; Coebergh van den Braak RRJ; van de Werken HJG; van Riet J; van Galen A; de Weerd V; van der Vlugt-Daane M; Bril SI; Lalmahomed ZS; Kloosterman WP; Wilting SM; Foekens JA; IJzermans JNM; ; Martens JWM; Sieuwerts AM
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Jun; 19(1):236. PubMed ID: 29929481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison between ribo-minus RNA-sequencing and polyA-selected RNA-sequencing.
    Cui P; Lin Q; Ding F; Xin C; Gong W; Zhang L; Geng J; Zhang B; Yu X; Yang J; Hu S; Yu J
    Genomics; 2010 Nov; 96(5):259-65. PubMed ID: 20688152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Next-generation sequencing facilitates quantitative analysis of wild-type and Nrl(-/-) retinal transcriptomes.
    Brooks MJ; Rajasimha HK; Roger JE; Swaroop A
    Mol Vis; 2011; 17():3034-54. PubMed ID: 22162623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expression analysis of RNA sequencing data from human neural and glial cell lines depends on technical replication and normalization methods.
    Knight VB; Serrano EE
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2018 Nov; 19(Suppl 14):412. PubMed ID: 30453873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single read and paired end mRNA-Seq Illumina libraries from 10 nanograms total RNA.
    Sengupta S; Bolin JM; Ruotti V; Nguyen BK; Thomson JA; Elwell AL; Stewart R
    J Vis Exp; 2011 Oct; (56):e3340. PubMed ID: 22064688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Systematic comparison of RNA-Seq normalization methods using measurement error models.
    Sun Z; Zhu Y
    Bioinformatics; 2012 Oct; 28(20):2584-91. PubMed ID: 22914217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recurrent functional misinterpretation of RNA-seq data caused by sample-specific gene length bias.
    Mandelboum S; Manber Z; Elroy-Stein O; Elkon R
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Nov; 17(11):e3000481. PubMed ID: 31714939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of normalization methods in mammalian microRNA-Seq data.
    Garmire LX; Subramaniam S
    RNA; 2012 Jun; 18(6):1279-88. PubMed ID: 22532701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples.
    Wagner GP; Kin K; Lynch VJ
    Theory Biosci; 2012 Dec; 131(4):281-5. PubMed ID: 22872506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A normalization method that controls for total RNA abundance affects the identification of differentially expressed genes, revealing bias toward morning-expressed responses.
    Laosuntisuk K; Vennapusa A; Somayanda IM; Leman AR; Jagadish SK; Doherty CJ
    Plant J; 2024 Jun; 118(5):1241-1257. PubMed ID: 38289828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Methods for small RNA preparation for digital gene expression profiling by next-generation sequencing.
    Linsen SE; Cuppen E
    Methods Mol Biol; 2012; 822():205-17. PubMed ID: 22144201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bias detection and correction in RNA-Sequencing data.
    Zheng W; Chung LM; Zhao H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2011 Jul; 12():290. PubMed ID: 21771300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Normalization strategies for mRNA expression data in cartilage research.
    Fundel K; Haag J; Gebhard PM; Zimmer R; Aigner T
    Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2008 Aug; 16(8):947-55. PubMed ID: 18258458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.