213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24587184)
21. Helical tomotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma-any advantages over conventional intensity-modulated radiotherapy?
Wu WC; Mui WL; Fung WK
Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):122-7. PubMed ID: 19931024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: dosimetric advantage over conventional plans and feasibility of dose escalation.
Kam MK; Chau RM; Suen J; Choi PH; Teo PM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 May; 56(1):145-57. PubMed ID: 12694833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Dose planning study of target volume coverage with intensity- modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Penang General Hospital experience.
Phua Chee Ee V; Tan BS; Tan AL; Eng KY; Ng BS; Ung NM
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2013; 14(4):2243-8. PubMed ID: 23725120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy with hybrid technique.
Akbas U; Koksal C; Kesen ND; Ozkaya K; Bilge H; Altun M
Med Dosim; 2019 Autumn; 44(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 30366620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparative evaluation of treatment plan quality for a prototype biology-guided radiotherapy system in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Han C; Da Silva AJ; Liang J; Wohlers C; Huntzinger C; Neylon JP; Du D; Wong JYC; Liu A
Med Dosim; 2021 Summer; 46(2):171-178. PubMed ID: 33272744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Dosimetric Evaluation of Different Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques for Breast Cancer After Conservative Surgery.
Zhang F; Wang Y; Xu W; Jiang H; Liu Q; Gao J; Yao B; Hou J; He H
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2015 Oct; 14(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 25311257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Knowledge-based planning using both the predicted DVH of organ-at risk and planning target volume.
Jiao SX; Wang ML; Chen LX; Liu XW
Med Eng Phys; 2022 Dec; 110():103803. PubMed ID: 35461772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Treatment planning strategy for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost for multiple brain metastases using intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; McClinton C; Shen X; Lominska C; Saleh H; Badkul R; Jiang H; Mitchell M; Wang F
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 27692518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lee TF; Fang FM; Chao PJ; Su TJ; Wang LK; Leung SW
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Oct; 89(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 18524401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Dosimetric benefits of placing dose constraints on the brachial plexus in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma receiving intensity-modulated radiation therapy: a comparative study.
Jiang H; Lu H; Yuan H; Huang H; Wei Y; Zhang Y; Liu X
J Radiat Res; 2015 Jan; 56(1):114-21. PubMed ID: 25173085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Automatic segmentation for adaptive planning in nasopharyngeal carcinoma IMRT: Time, geometrical, and dosimetric analysis.
Fung NTC; Hung WM; Sze CK; Lee MCH; Ng WT
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):60-65. PubMed ID: 31345672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Feasibility of constant dose rate VMAT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal cancer patients.
Yu W; Shang H; Xie C; Han C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Jin X
Radiat Oncol; 2014 Nov; 9():235. PubMed ID: 25366034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A dosimetric evaluation on applying RTOG-based and CT/MRI-based delineation methods to brachial plexus in radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with helical tomotherapy.
Li CH; Wu VW; Chiu G
Br J Radiol; 2019 Oct; 92(1102):20170881. PubMed ID: 29714086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is 9-field IMRT superior to 7-field IMRT in the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma?
Ibrahim MS; Attalla EM; El Naggar M; Elshemey WM
Indian J Cancer; 2020; 57(4):388-392. PubMed ID: 33078744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy for the treatment of a large planning target volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Abbas AS; Moseley D; Kassam Z; Kim SM; Cho C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2013 May; 14(3):4269. PubMed ID: 23652258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. The effect of the target-organ geometric complexity on the choice of delivery between RapidArc and sliding-window IMRT for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Kan MW; Leung LH; Yu PK
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(3):337-43. PubMed ID: 23642300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Which T category of nasopharyngeal carcinoma may benefit most from volumetric modulated arc therapy compared with step and shoot intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Sun Y; Guo R; Yin WJ; Tang LL; Yu XL; Chen M; Qi ZY; Liu MZ; Ma J
PLoS One; 2013; 8(9):e75304. PubMed ID: 24086503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Assessment of anatomical and dosimetric changes by a deformable registration method during the course of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
Lu J; Ma Y; Chen J; Wang L; Zhang G; Zhao M; Yin Y
J Radiat Res; 2014 Jan; 55(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 23728319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Dosimetric benefit to organs at risk following margin reductions in nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Mao YP; Yin WJ; Guo R; Zhang GS; Fang JL; Chi F; Qi ZY; Liu MZ; Ma J; Sun Y
Chin J Cancer; 2015 May; 34(5):189-97. PubMed ID: 26058563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Improving target dose coverage and organ-at-risk sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of advanced laryngeal cancer by a simple optimization technique.
Lu JY; Wu LL; Zhang JY; Zheng J; Cheung ML; Ma CC; Xie LX; Huang BT
Br J Radiol; 2015 Feb; 88(1046):20140654. PubMed ID: 25494885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
