163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24587396)
21. Predator faunas past and present: quantifying the influence of waterborne cues in divergent ecotypes of the isopod Asellus aquaticus.
Harris S; Karlsson Green K; Pettersson LB
Oecologia; 2013 Nov; 173(3):791-9. PubMed ID: 23636460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Kit foxes demonstrate adaptive compromise characteristics under intraguild predation pressure by coyotes in the Great Basin desert.
Pershyn NA; Gese EM; Stuber EF; Kluever BM
Sci Rep; 2024 Jun; 14(1):14446. PubMed ID: 38910176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Causes of habitat divergence in two species of agamid lizards in arid central Australia.
Daly BG; Dickman CR; Crowther MS
Ecology; 2008 Jan; 89(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 18376548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Interference competition: odours of an apex predator and conspecifics influence resource acquisition by red foxes.
Leo V; Reading RP; Letnic M
Oecologia; 2015 Dec; 179(4):1033-40. PubMed ID: 26296332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Central-place foraging and ecological effects of an invasive predator across multiple habitats.
Benkwitt CE
Ecology; 2016 Oct; 97(10):2729-2739. PubMed ID: 27859117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. The effects of predator odors in mammalian prey species: a review of field and laboratory studies.
Apfelbach R; Blanchard CD; Blanchard RJ; Hayes RA; McGregor IS
Neurosci Biobehav Rev; 2005; 29(8):1123-44. PubMed ID: 16085312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental evidence of an age-specific shift in chemical detection of predators in a lizard.
Head ML; Keogh JS; Doughty P
J Chem Ecol; 2002 Mar; 28(3):541-54. PubMed ID: 11944831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A triple threat: high population density, high foraging intensity and flexible habitat preferences explain high impact of feral cats on prey.
Hamer RP; Gardiner RZ; Proft KM; Johnson CN; Jones ME
Proc Biol Sci; 2021 Jan; 288(1942):20201194. PubMed ID: 33402069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. A nomadic avian predator displays flexibility in prey choice during episodic outbreaks of rodents in arid Australia.
Pavey CR
Oecologia; 2021 May; 196(1):211-222. PubMed ID: 33934187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Patch use in time and space for a meso-predator in a risky world.
Mukherjee S; Zelcer M; Kotler BP
Oecologia; 2009 Mar; 159(3):661-8. PubMed ID: 19082629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Social learning of predators in the dark: understanding the role of visual, chemical and mechanical information.
Manassa RP; McCormick MI; Chivers DP; Ferrari MC
Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Aug; 280(1765):20130720. PubMed ID: 23804616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Interacting effects of predation risk and signal patchiness on activity and communication in house mice.
Hughes NK; Banks PB
J Anim Ecol; 2010 Jan; 79(1):88-97. PubMed ID: 19941627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predator odor exposure increases food-carrying behavior in rats.
Wernecke KE; Brüggemann J; Fendt M
Physiol Behav; 2016 Feb; 154():15-9. PubMed ID: 26556540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Unpredictability of escape trajectory explains predator evasion ability and microhabitat preference of desert rodents.
Moore TY; Cooper KL; Biewener AA; Vasudevan R
Nat Commun; 2017 Sep; 8(1):440. PubMed ID: 28874728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Year-round water management for desert bighorn sheep corresponds with visits by predators not bighorn sheep.
Harris GM; Stewart DR; Brown D; Johnson L; Sanderson J; Alvidrez A; Waddell T; Thompson R
PLoS One; 2020; 15(11):e0241131. PubMed ID: 33232333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Predator hunting mode and habitat domain alter nonconsumptive effects in predator-prey interactions.
Preisser EL; Orrock JL; Schmitz OJ
Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2744-51. PubMed ID: 18051642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Rodents balancing a variety of risks: invasive fire ants and indirect and direct indicators of predation risk.
Orrock JL; Danielson BJ
Oecologia; 2004 Aug; 140(4):662-7. PubMed ID: 15185138
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Olfactory assessment of predation risk in the aquatic environment.
Wisenden BD
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2000 Sep; 355(1401):1205-8. PubMed ID: 11079399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Predator avoidance during reproduction: diel movements by spawning sockeye salmon between stream and lake habitats.
Bentley KT; Schindler DE; Cline TJ; Armstrong JB; Macias D; Ciepiela LR; Hilborn R
J Anim Ecol; 2014 Nov; 83(6):1478-89. PubMed ID: 24702169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. What cues do ungulates use to assess predation risk in dense temperate forests?
Kuijper DP; Verwijmeren M; Churski M; Zbyryt A; Schmidt K; Jędrzejewska B; Smit C
PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84607. PubMed ID: 24404177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
