159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24587978)
1. Paradoxes in Carcinogenesis: There Is Light at the End of That Tunnel!
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Disrupt Sci Technol; 2013 May; 1(3):154-156. PubMed ID: 24587978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. SMT or TOFT? How the two main theories of carcinogenesis are made (artificially) incompatible.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2015 Sep; 63(3):257-67. PubMed ID: 25851566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The cancer puzzle: Welcome to organicism.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2021 Oct; 165():114-119. PubMed ID: 34271028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinogenesis explained within the context of a theory of organisms.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Prog Biophys Mol Biol; 2016 Oct; 122(1):70-76. PubMed ID: 27498170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Are the somatic mutation and tissue organization field theories of carcinogenesis incompatible?
Rosenfeld S
Cancer Inform; 2013; 12():221-9. PubMed ID: 24324325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. SMT and TOFT: Why and How They are Opposite and Incompatible Paradigms.
Bizzarri M; Cucina A
Acta Biotheor; 2016 Sep; 64(3):221-39. PubMed ID: 27283400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. SMT and TOFT Integrable After All: A Reply to Bizzarri and Cucina.
Bedessem B; Ruphy S
Acta Biotheor; 2017 Mar; 65(1):81-85. PubMed ID: 27535677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. New hypotheses for cancer generation and progression.
Mazzocca A; Fais S
Med Hypotheses; 2021 Jul; 152():110614. PubMed ID: 34087614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The tissue organization field theory of cancer: a testable replacement for the somatic mutation theory.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
Bioessays; 2011 May; 33(5):332-40. PubMed ID: 21503935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Cancer and the elusive cancer genes].
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Med Sci (Paris); 2014; 30(6-7):688-92. PubMed ID: 25014463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Chaos and cancers. Theories concerning carcinogenesis.
Kwasniewski W; Stupak A; Kotarski J; Gozdzicak-Jozefiak A
Ginekol Pol; 2021; 92(4):318-321. PubMed ID: 33757157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergentism as a default: cancer as a problem of tissue organization.
Soto AM; Sonnenschein C
J Biosci; 2005 Feb; 30(1):103-18. PubMed ID: 15824446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A cancer theory kerfuffle can lead to new lines of research.
Baker SG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Feb; 107(2):. PubMed ID: 25528755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Metaphor, recursive systems, and paradox in science and developmental theory.
Overton WF
Adv Child Dev Behav; 1991; 23():59-71. PubMed ID: 1767726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Integrative Approach Toward Biology, Organisms, and Cancer.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1702():15-26. PubMed ID: 29119499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Over a century of cancer research: Inconvenient truths and promising leads.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
PLoS Biol; 2020 Apr; 18(4):e3000670. PubMed ID: 32236102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Paradoxical Behavior of Oncogenes Undermines the Somatic Mutation Theory.
Monti N; Verna R; Piombarolo A; Querqui A; Bizzarri M; Fedeli V
Biomolecules; 2022 Apr; 12(5):. PubMed ID: 35625590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An Emergence Framework of Carcinogenesis.
Sigston EAW; Williams BRG
Front Oncol; 2017; 7():198. PubMed ID: 28959682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cancer Metastases: So Close and So Far.
Sonnenschein C; Soto AM
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Nov; 107(11):. PubMed ID: 26283653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Low-fidelity compensatory backup alternative DNA repair pathways may unify current carcinogenesis theories.
Wu J; Starr S
Future Oncol; 2014 May; 10(7):1239-53. PubMed ID: 24947263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
