These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24588552)

  • 1. Impact of contact lens zone geometry and ocular optics on bifocal retinal image quality.
    Bradley A; Nam J; Xu R; Harman L; Thibos L
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 May; 34(3):331-45. PubMed ID: 24588552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of age, decentration, aberrations and pupil size on subjective image quality with concentric bifocal optics.
    Rio D; Woog K; Legras R
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):411-20. PubMed ID: 27196105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of primary spherical aberration, spatial frequency and Stiles Crawford apodization on wavefront determined refractive error: a computational study.
    Xu R; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2013 Jul; 33(4):444-55. PubMed ID: 23683093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Predicted accommodative response from image quality in young eyes fitted with different dual-focus designs.
    Faria-Ribeiro M; Amorim-de-Sousa A; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 May; 38(3):309-316. PubMed ID: 29383756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of spherical aberration, stimulus spatial frequency, and pupil apodisation on subjective refractions.
    Bradley A; Xu R; Thibos L; Marin G; Hernandez M
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2014 May; 34(3):309-20. PubMed ID: 24397356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Simulation of commercial vs theoretically optimised contact lenses for presbyopia.
    Legras R; Rio D
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2017 May; 37(3):297-304. PubMed ID: 28439978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multifocal contact lenses: towards customisation?
    Faria-Ribeiro M; González-Méijome JM
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2019 Jan; 39(1):37-45. PubMed ID: 30628741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical quality of rotationally symmetrical contact lenses derived from their power profiles.
    Del Águila-Carrasco AJ; Monsálvez-Romín D; Papadatou E
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2017 Oct; 40(5):346-350. PubMed ID: 28522252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Power profiles of multifocal contact lenses and their interpretation.
    Plainis S; Atchison DA; Charman WN
    Optom Vis Sci; 2013 Oct; 90(10):1066-77. PubMed ID: 23995515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Simulated in situ optical performance of bifocal contact lenses.
    Chateau N; Baude D
    Optom Vis Sci; 1997 Jul; 74(7):532-9. PubMed ID: 9293522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Optical and imaging properties of a novel multi-segment spectacle lens designed to slow myopia progression.
    Jaskulski M; Singh NK; Bradley A; Kollbaum PS
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2020 Sep; 40(5):549-556. PubMed ID: 32808381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optical design considerations for contact lens bifocals.
    Erickson P; Robboy M; Apollonio A; Jones WF
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1988 Mar; 59(3):198-202. PubMed ID: 3351186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Chromatic aberration and polychromatic image quality with diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Ravikumar S; Bradley A; Thibos LN
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jul; 40(7):1192-204. PubMed ID: 24957438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Liquid Crystal Spatial Light Modulators for Simulating Zonal Multifocal Lenses.
    Li Y; Bradley A; Xu R; Kollbaum PS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2017 Sep; 94(9):867-875. PubMed ID: 28816865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extended depth of focus contact lenses vs. two commercial multifocals: Part 1. Optical performance evaluation via computed through-focus retinal image quality metrics.
    Bakaraju RC; Ehrmann K; Ho A
    J Optom; 2018; 11(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 28606456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optical performance of decentered bifocal contact lenses.
    Woods RL; Saunders JE; Port MJ
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Mar; 70(3):171-84. PubMed ID: 8483576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of target distance and pupil size on letter contrast sensitivity with simultaneous vision bifocal contact lenses.
    Bradley A; Abdul Rahman H; Soni PS; Zhang X
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):476-81. PubMed ID: 8336909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Diffractive bifocal lens designs.
    Cohen AL
    Optom Vis Sci; 1993 Jun; 70(6):461-8. PubMed ID: 8336907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality in wearers of a centre distance concentric design bifocal contact lens.
    Gispets J; Arjona M; Pujol J
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2002 May; 22(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 12090637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental investigation of accommodation in eyes fit with multifocal contact lenses using a clinical auto-refractor.
    Altoaimi BH; Kollbaum P; Meyer D; Bradley A
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2018 Mar; 38(2):152-163. PubMed ID: 29315718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.