These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24588898)
1. Integrative computational modeling of protein interactions. Rodrigues JP; Bonvin AM FEBS J; 2014 Apr; 281(8):1988-2003. PubMed ID: 24588898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A structural perspective on protein-protein interactions. Russell RB; Alber F; Aloy P; Davis FP; Korkin D; Pichaud M; Topf M; Sali A Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2004 Jun; 14(3):313-24. PubMed ID: 15193311 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quantitative use of chemical shifts for the modeling of protein complexes. Stratmann D; Boelens R; Bonvin AM Proteins; 2011 Sep; 79(9):2662-70. PubMed ID: 21744392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Data-driven docking for the study of biomolecular complexes. van Dijk AD; Boelens R; Bonvin AM FEBS J; 2005 Jan; 272(2):293-312. PubMed ID: 15654870 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Expanding the frontiers of protein-protein modeling: from docking and scoring to binding affinity predictions and other challenges. Pallara C; Jiménez-García B; Pérez-Cano L; Romero-Durana M; Solernou A; Grosdidier S; Pons C; Moal IH; Fernandez-Recio J Proteins; 2013 Dec; 81(12):2192-200. PubMed ID: 23934865 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Various strategies of using residual dipolar couplings in NMR-driven protein docking: application to Lys48-linked di-ubiquitin and validation against 15N-relaxation data. van Dijk AD; Fushman D; Bonvin AM Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):367-81. PubMed ID: 15937902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Protein-protein docking: is the glass half-full or half-empty? Vajda S; Camacho CJ Trends Biotechnol; 2004 Mar; 22(3):110-6. PubMed ID: 15036860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Structural characterization of protein-protein complexes by integrating computational docking with small-angle scattering data. Pons C; D'Abramo M; Svergun DI; Orozco M; Bernadó P; Fernández-Recio J J Mol Biol; 2010 Oct; 403(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 20804770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparisons of NMR spectral quality and success in crystallization demonstrate that NMR and X-ray crystallography are complementary methods for small protein structure determination. Snyder DA; Chen Y; Denissova NG; Acton T; Aramini JM; Ciano M; Karlin R; Liu J; Manor P; Rajan PA; Rossi P; Swapna GV; Xiao R; Rost B; Hunt J; Montelione GT J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Nov; 127(47):16505-11. PubMed ID: 16305237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Information-driven modeling of large macromolecular assemblies using NMR data. van Ingen H; Bonvin AM J Magn Reson; 2014 Apr; 241():103-14. PubMed ID: 24656083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protein structure prediction: combining de novo modeling with sparse experimental data. Latek D; Ekonomiuk D; Kolinski A J Comput Chem; 2007 Jul; 28(10):1668-76. PubMed ID: 17342709 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Combinatorial docking approach for structure prediction of large proteins and multi-molecular assemblies. Inbar Y; Benyamini H; Nussinov R; Wolfson HJ Phys Biol; 2005 Nov; 2(4):S156-65. PubMed ID: 16280621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Refinement of multidomain protein structures by combination of solution small-angle X-ray scattering and NMR data. Grishaev A; Wu J; Trewhella J; Bax A J Am Chem Soc; 2005 Nov; 127(47):16621-8. PubMed ID: 16305251 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A large decoy set of protein-protein complexes produced by flexible docking. Launay G; Simonson T J Comput Chem; 2011 Jan; 32(1):106-20. PubMed ID: 20623649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]