These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24589081)

  • 1. Rescue karyotyping: a case series of array-based comparative genomic hybridization evaluation of archival conceptual tissue.
    Kudesia R; Li M; Smith J; Patel A; Williams Z
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2014 Mar; 12():19. PubMed ID: 24589081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Diagnostic utility of microarray testing in pregnancy loss.
    Rosenfeld JA; Tucker ME; Escobar LF; Neill NJ; Torchia BS; McDaniel LD; Schultz RA; Chong K; Chitayat D
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 46(4):478-86. PubMed ID: 25846569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Miscarriage chromosome testing: utility of comparative genomic hybridization with reflex microsatellite analysis in preserved miscarriage tissue.
    Mathur N; Triplett L; Stephenson MD
    Fertil Steril; 2014 May; 101(5):1349-52. PubMed ID: 24636399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic analysis of chorionic villus sampling from pregnancy loss in comparison to karyotyping and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.
    Deshpande M; Harper J; Holloway M; Palmer R; Wang R
    Genet Test Mol Biomarkers; 2010 Jun; 14(3):421-4. PubMed ID: 20408732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Combination of QF-PCR and aCGH is an efficient diagnostic strategy for the detection of chromosome aberrations in recurrent miscarriage.
    Lovrečić L; Pereza N; Jaklič H; Ostojić S; Peterlin B
    Mol Genet Genomic Med; 2019 Dec; 7(12):e980. PubMed ID: 31643138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Single-Nucleotide Polymorphism-Microarray Ploidy Analysis of Paraffin-Embedded Products of Conception in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss Evaluations.
    Maslow BS; Budinetz T; Sueldo C; Anspach E; Engmann L; Benadiva C; Nulsen JC
    Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jul; 126(1):175-81. PubMed ID: 26241271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation combined with 24-chromosome microarray of miscarriage tissue provides a probable or definite cause of pregnancy loss in over 90% of patients.
    Popescu F; Jaslow CR; Kutteh WH
    Hum Reprod; 2018 Apr; 33(4):579-587. PubMed ID: 29538673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Karyotype evaluation of repeated abortions in primary and secondary recurrent pregnancy loss.
    Nikitina TV; Sazhenova EA; Zhigalina DI; Tolmacheva EN; Sukhanova NN; Lebedev IN
    J Assist Reprod Genet; 2020 Mar; 37(3):517-525. PubMed ID: 32009222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comprehensive genetic analysis of pregnancy loss by chromosomal microarrays: outcomes, benefits, and challenges.
    Sahoo T; Dzidic N; Strecker MN; Commander S; Travis MK; Doherty C; Tyson RW; Mendoza AE; Stephenson M; Dise CA; Benito CW; Ziadie MS; Hovanes K
    Genet Med; 2017 Jan; 19(1):83-89. PubMed ID: 27337029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Acrocentric Chromosome Polymorphic Variants on Chinese Female Have Possible Association with Unexplained Recurrent Pregnancy Loss.
    Feng X; Liu J; Wang Y; Fu J; Qin Q; Cao Y; Wu Y
    Reprod Sci; 2021 Feb; 28(2):575-584. PubMed ID: 33025528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diagnosis of aneuploidy in archival, paraffin-embedded pregnancy-loss tissues by comparative genomic hybridization.
    Bell KA; Van Deerlin PG; Feinberg RF; du Manoir S; Haddad BR
    Fertil Steril; 2001 Feb; 75(2):374-9. PubMed ID: 11172842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a comparison of live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss due to embryonic aneuploidy or recurrent implantation failure.
    Sato T; Sugiura-Ogasawara M; Ozawa F; Yamamoto T; Kato T; Kurahashi H; Kuroda T; Aoyama N; Kato K; Kobayashi R; Fukuda A; Utsunomiya T; Kuwahara A; Saito H; Takeshita T; Irahara M
    Hum Reprod; 2019 Dec; 34(12):2340-2348. PubMed ID: 31811307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome Sequencing Explores Complexity of Chromosomal Abnormalities in Recurrent Miscarriage.
    Dong Z; Yan J; Xu F; Yuan J; Jiang H; Wang H; Chen H; Zhang L; Ye L; Xu J; Shi Y; Yang Z; Cao Y; Chen L; Li Q; Zhao X; Li J; Chen A; Zhang W; Wong HG; Qin Y; Zhao H; Chen Y; Li P; Ma T; Wang WJ; Kwok YK; Jiang Y; Pursley AN; Chung JPW; Hong Y; Kristiansen K; Yang H; Piña-Aguilar RE; Leung TY; Cheung SW; Morton CC; Choy KW; Chen ZJ
    Am J Hum Genet; 2019 Dec; 105(6):1102-1111. PubMed ID: 31679651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical validity of karyotyping for the diagnosis of chromosomal imbalance following array comparative genomic hybridisation.
    Gekas J; Vallée M; Castonguay L; Laframboise R; Maranda B; Piedboeuf B; Rousseau F
    J Med Genet; 2011 Dec; 48(12):851-5. PubMed ID: 21965346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prenatal diagnosis and molecular cytogenetic characterization of three chromosomal abnormalities with favorable outcomes.
    Chen Q; Xu Z; Chen G; Liu S; Xia Y
    Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Mar; 59(2):338-341. PubMed ID: 32127162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Molecular inversion probe array for the genetic evaluation of stillbirth using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue.
    Rowe LR; Thaker HM; Opitz JM; Schiffman JD; Haddadin ZM; Erickson LK; South ST
    J Mol Diagn; 2013 Jul; 15(4):466-72. PubMed ID: 23665195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Array comparative genomic hybridization and fetal congenital heart defects: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Jansen FA; Blumenfeld YJ; Fisher A; Cobben JM; Odibo AO; Borrell A; Haak MC
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Jan; 45(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 25319878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Array comparative genomic hybridization for genetic evaluation of fetal loss between 10 and 20 weeks of gestation.
    Warren JE; Turok DK; Maxwell TM; Brothman AR; Silver RM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1093-1102. PubMed ID: 20168112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cytogenetics and molecular karyotyping for chromosome testing of miscarriage specimens.
    Shah MS; Cinnioglu C; Maisenbacher M; Comstock I; Kort J; Lathi RB
    Fertil Steril; 2017 Apr; 107(4):1028-1033. PubMed ID: 28283267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Application of a target array comparative genomic hybridization to prenatal diagnosis.
    Park JH; Woo JH; Shim SH; Yang SJ; Choi YM; Yang KS; Cha DH
    BMC Med Genet; 2010 Jun; 11():102. PubMed ID: 20576126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.