These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24589404)
1. Methods for CT automatic exposure control protocol translation between scanner platforms. McKenney SE; Seibert JA; Lamba R; Boone JM J Am Coll Radiol; 2014 Mar; 11(3):285-91. PubMed ID: 24589404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Practical experiences in the transfer of clinical protocols between CT scanners with different ATCM systems. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Cheebsumon P; Pengpan T J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):84-96. PubMed ID: 27977415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automatic exposure control in computed tomography--an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers. Söderberg M; Gunnarsson M Acta Radiol; 2010 Jul; 51(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 20429764 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Design and use of a phantom for testing and comparing the performance of computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Krisanachinda A J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):753-773. PubMed ID: 32303017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of different phantom designs for CT scanner automatic tube current modulation system tests. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ J Radiol Prot; 2013 Dec; 33(4):735-61. PubMed ID: 24025482 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimisation of CT protocols in PET-CT across different scanner models using different automatic exposure control methods and iterative reconstruction algorithms. Gould SM; Mackewn J; Chicklore S; Cook GJR; Mallia A; Pike L EJNMMI Phys; 2021 Jul; 8(1):58. PubMed ID: 34331602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A routine quality assurance test for CT automatic exposure control systems. Iball GR; Moore AC; Crawford EJ J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 17(4):291-306. PubMed ID: 27455490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental assessment of the influence of beam hardening filters on image quality and patient dose in volumetric 64-slice X-ray CT scanners. Ay MR; Mehranian A; Maleki A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Zaidi H Phys Med; 2013 May; 29(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 22541061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT head-scan dosimetry in an anthropomorphic phantom and associated measurement of ACR accreditation-phantom imaging metrics under clinically representative scan conditions. Brunner CC; Stern SH; Minniti R; Parry MI; Skopec M; Chakrabarti K Med Phys; 2013 Aug; 40(8):081917. PubMed ID: 23927331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of x-ray tube stabilization on localized radiation dose in axial CT scans: initial results in CTDI phantoms. Mathieu KB; McNitt-Gray MF; Cody DD Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7363-7376. PubMed ID: 27694696 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Utilizing a simple CT dosimetry phantom for the comprehension of the operational characteristics of CT AEC systems. Tsalafoutas IA; Varsamidis A; Thalassinou S; Efstathopoulos EP Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111918. PubMed ID: 24320451 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Setting up computed tomography automatic tube current modulation systems. Martin CJ; Sookpeng S J Radiol Prot; 2016 Sep; 36(3):R74-R95. PubMed ID: 27485613 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. CT automated exposure control using a generalized detectability index. Khobragade P; Rupcich F; Fan J; Crotty DJ; Kulkarni NM; O'Connor SD; Foley WD; Schmidt TG Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):140-151. PubMed ID: 30417403 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Size-specific optimization of CT protocols based on minimum detectability. Zhang Y; Smitherman C; Samei E Med Phys; 2017 Apr; 44(4):1301-1311. PubMed ID: 28122119 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Computed tomography automatic exposure control techniques in 18F-FDG oncology PET-CT scanning. Iball GR; Tout D Nucl Med Commun; 2014 Apr; 35(4):372-81. PubMed ID: 24445670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Upper limits of the photon fluence rate on CT detectors: Case study on a commercial scanner. Persson M; Bujila R; Nowik P; Andersson H; Kull L; Andersson J; Bornefalk H; Danielsson M Med Phys; 2016 Jul; 43(7):4398. PubMed ID: 27370155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relationships between patient size, dose and image noise under automatic tube current modulation systems. Sookpeng S; Martin CJ; Gentle DJ; Lopez-Gonzalez MR J Radiol Prot; 2014 Mar; 34(1):103-23. PubMed ID: 24334678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Automatic exposure control in multichannel CT with tube current modulation to achieve a constant level of image noise: experimental assessment on pediatric phantoms. Brisse HJ; Madec L; Gaboriaud G; Lemoine T; Savignoni A; Neuenschwander S; Aubert B; Rosenwald JC Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):3018-33. PubMed ID: 17822010 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effective dose and image quality evaluations of an automatic CT tube current modulation system with an anthropomorphic phantom. Rampado O; Marchisio F; Izzo A; Garelli E; Bianchi CC; Gandini G; Ropolo R Eur J Radiol; 2009 Oct; 72(1):181-7. PubMed ID: 18692337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]