266 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24590340)
1. Pedicle screw "hubbing" in the immature thoracic spine: a biomechanical and micro-computed tomography evaluation.
Kang DG; Lehman RA; Bevevino AJ; Gaume RE; Purcell RL; Dmitriev AE; Lenke LG
J Pediatr Orthop; 2014; 34(7):703-9. PubMed ID: 24590340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The biomechanical effect of pedicle screw hubbing on pullout resistance in the thoracic spine.
Paik H; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Kang DG; Lenke LG
Spine J; 2012 May; 12(5):417-24. PubMed ID: 22480532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tapping insertional torque allows prediction for better pedicle screw fixation and optimal screw size selection.
Helgeson MD; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Dmitriev AE; Luhmann SJ
Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):957-65. PubMed ID: 23602374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pullout strength of thoracic pedicle screws improved with cortical bone ratio: a cadaveric study.
Chou WK; Chien A; Wang JL
J Orthop Sci; 2014 Nov; 19(6):900-6. PubMed ID: 25100570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biomechanical evaluation of the pedicle screw insertion depth effect on screw stability under cyclic loading and subsequent pullout.
Karami KJ; Buckenmeyer LE; Kiapour AM; Kelkar PS; Goel VK; Demetropoulos CK; Soo TM
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Apr; 28(3):E133-9. PubMed ID: 25310387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Biomechanical study and digital modeling of traction resistance in posterior thoracic implants].
Gayet LE; Hamcha H; Charbonneau A; Texereau J; Bertheau D; Bellicaud D; Pries P
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2001 Sep; 87(5):459-68. PubMed ID: 11547233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The effect of hubbing on the pull-out strength of lateral mass screws in the cervical spine: a biomechanical experiment.
Koo KH; Yoon ST; Kim SB; Hutton WC
J Spinal Disord Tech; 2015 Feb; 28(1):E45-8. PubMed ID: 25075989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pedicle screw fixation strength: pullout versus insertional torque.
Inceoglu S; Ferrara L; McLain RF
Spine J; 2004; 4(5):513-8. PubMed ID: 15363421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computed tomography and biomechanical evaluation of screw fixation options at the cervicothoracic junction: intralamina versus intrapedicular techniques.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Lehman RA; Helgeson M; Cooper P; Rosner MK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(24):2612-7. PubMed ID: 19011542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Paravertebral foramen screw fixation for posterior cervical spine fusion: biomechanical study and description of a novel technique.
Maki S; Aramomi M; Matsuura Y; Furuya T; Ota M; Iijima Y; Saito J; Suzuki T; Mannoji C; Takahashi K; Yamazaki M; Koda M
J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):415-420. PubMed ID: 28498072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The impact of a distal expansion mechanism added to a standard pedicle screw on pullout resistance. A biomechanical study.
Koller H; Zenner J; Hitzl W; Resch H; Stephan D; Augat P; Penzkofer R; Korn G; Kendell A; Meier O; Mayer M
Spine J; 2013 May; 13(5):532-41. PubMed ID: 23415899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using lamina screws as a salvage technique at C-7: computed tomography and biomechanical analysis using cadaveric vertebrae. Laboratory investigation.
Cardoso MJ; Dmitriev AE; Helgeson MD; Stephens F; Campbell V; Lehman RA; Cooper P; Rosner MK
J Neurosurg Spine; 2009 Jul; 11(1):28-33. PubMed ID: 19569937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Primary pedicle screw augmentation in osteoporotic lumbar vertebrae: biomechanical analysis of pedicle fixation strength.
Burval DJ; McLain RF; Milks R; Inceoglu S
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 May; 32(10):1077-83. PubMed ID: 17471088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of rod reduction on pedicle screw fixation strength in the setting of Ponte osteotomies.
Kang DG; Lehman RA; Wagner SC; Bevevino AJ; Tracey RW; Gaume RE; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2015 Jan; 15(1):146-52. PubMed ID: 25088957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biomechanical analysis of pedicle screw thread differential design in an osteoporotic cadaver model.
Mehta H; Santos E; Ledonio C; Sembrano J; Ellingson A; Pare P; Murrell B; Nuckley DJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2012 Mar; 27(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 22071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The biomechanical consequences of rod reduction on pedicle screws: should it be avoided?
Paik H; Kang DG; Lehman RA; Gaume RE; Ambati DV; Dmitriev AE
Spine J; 2013 Nov; 13(11):1617-26. PubMed ID: 23769931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Pedicle and transverse process screws of the upper thoracic spine. Biomechanical comparison of loads to failure.
Heller JG; Shuster JK; Hutton WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Apr; 24(7):654-8. PubMed ID: 10209793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Krag versus Caudad trajectory technique for pedicle screw insertion in osteoporotic vertebrae: biomechanical comparison and analysis.
Yuan Q; Han X; Han X; He D; Liu B; Tian W
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Dec; 39(26 Spec No.):B27-35. PubMed ID: 25504099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Pedicle screw reinsertion using previous pilot hole and trajectory does not reduce fixation strength.
Kang DG; Lehman RA; Wagner SC; Bevevino AJ; Bernstock JD; Gaume RE; Dmitriev AE
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Sep; 39(20):1640-7. PubMed ID: 24979143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Which salvage fixation technique is best for the failed initial screw fixation at the cervicothoracic junction? A biomechanical comparison study.
Hong JT; Tomoyuki T; Jain A; Orías AAE; Inoue N; An HS
Eur Spine J; 2017 Sep; 26(9):2417-2424. PubMed ID: 28752245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
