These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24591729)
21. Assessment of RF exposures from emerging wireless communication technologies in different environments. Joseph W; Verloock L; Goeminne F; Vermeeren G; Martens L Health Phys; 2012 Feb; 102(2):161-72. PubMed ID: 22217589 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. On the Assessment of Human Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields Transmitted by 5G NR Base Stations. Keller H Health Phys; 2019 Nov; 117(5):541-545. PubMed ID: 31022013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Temporal trends of radio-frequency electromagnetic field (RF-EMF) exposure in everyday environments across European cities. Urbinello D; Joseph W; Verloock L; Martens L; Röösli M Environ Res; 2014 Oct; 134():134-42. PubMed ID: 25127524 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Scientific panel on electromagnetic field health risks: consensus points, recommendations, and rationales. Fragopoulou A; Grigoriev Y; Johansson O; Margaritis LH; Morgan L; Richter E; Sage C Rev Environ Health; 2010; 25(4):307-17. PubMed ID: 21268443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A novel method to assess human population exposure induced by a wireless cellular network. Varsier N; Plets D; Corre Y; Vermeeren G; Joseph W; Aerts S; Martens L; Wiart J Bioelectromagnetics; 2015 Sep; 36(6):451-63. PubMed ID: 26113174 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Self-reporting of symptom development from exposure to radiofrequency fields of wireless smart meters in victoria, australia: a case series. Lamech F Altern Ther Health Med; 2014; 20(6):28-39. PubMed ID: 25478801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Electrical stimulation vs thermal effects in a complex electromagnetic environment. Paniagua JM; Rufo M; Jiménez A; Antolín A; Sánchez M Sci Total Environ; 2009 Aug; 407(16):4717-22. PubMed ID: 19481236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Analysis of exposure to electromagnetic fields in a healthcare environment: simulation and experimental study. de Miguel-Bilbao S; Martín MA; Del Pozo A; Febles V; Hernández JA; de Aldecoa JC; Ramos V Health Phys; 2013 Nov; 105(5 Suppl 3):S209-22. PubMed ID: 24077080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Radio frequency electromagnetic field compliance assessment of multi-band and MIMO equipped radio base stations. Thors B; Thielens A; Fridén J; Colombi D; Törnevik C; Vermeeren G; Martens L; Joseph W Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 May; 35(4):296-308. PubMed ID: 24523232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Electromagnetic field exposure monitoring of commercial 28-GHz band 5G base stations in Tokyo, Japan. Liu S; Tobita K; Onishi T; Taki M; Watanabe S Bioelectromagnetics; 2024 Sep; 45(6):281-292. PubMed ID: 38778514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exposure to high-frequency electromagnetic fields (100 kHz-2 GHz) in Extremadura (Spain). Rufo MM; Paniagua JM; Jiménez A; Antolín A Health Phys; 2011 Dec; 101(6):739-45. PubMed ID: 22048492 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of in utero wi-fi exposure on the pre- and postnatal development of rats. Poulletier de Gannes F; Haro E; Hurtier A; Taxile M; Athane A; Ait-Aissa S; Masuda H; Percherncier Y; Ruffié G; Billaudel B; Dufour P; Veyret B; Lagroye I Birth Defects Res B Dev Reprod Toxicol; 2012 Apr; 95(2):130-6. PubMed ID: 22311618 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Experimental verification of a radiofrequency power model for Wi-Fi technology. Fang M; Malone D Health Phys; 2010 Apr; 98(4):574-83. PubMed ID: 20220364 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Experimental procedures and statistical results for evaluation of exposure to a radiofrequency electromagnetic field with complex analogue modulation. Trinchero S; Benedetto A; Anglesio L; Trinchero D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 111(4):423-7. PubMed ID: 15550715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Public Exposure from Indoor Radiofrequency Radiation in the City of Hebron, West Bank-Palestine. Lahham A; Sharabati A; ALMasri H Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 26107432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of radiofrequency exposure levels from multiple wireless installations in population dense areas in Korea. Kim BC; Kim WK; Lee GT; Choi HD; Kim N; Pack JK Bioelectromagnetics; 2014 Dec; 35(8):603-6. PubMed ID: 25196664 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A prediction model for personal radio frequency electromagnetic field exposure. Frei P; Mohler E; Bürgi A; Fröhlich J; Neubauer G; Braun-Fahrländer C; Röösli M; Sci Total Environ; 2009 Dec; 408(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19819523 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Development of innovative methods of electromagnetic field evaluation for portable radio-station]. Rubtsova NB; Perov SIu; Bogacheva EV; Kuster N Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2013; (2):9-13. PubMed ID: 23785811 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. In-situ measurement procedures for temporal RF electromagnetic field exposure of the general public. Joseph W; Verloock L; Tanghe E; Martens L Health Phys; 2009 May; 96(5):529-42. PubMed ID: 19359846 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization and Evaluation of a Commercial WLAN System for Human Provocation Studies. Zentai N; Fiocchi S; Parazzini M; Trunk A; Juhász P; Ravazzani P; Hernádi I; Thuróczy G Biomed Res Int; 2015; 2015():289152. PubMed ID: 26180791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]