These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24592067)

  • 1. A randomized comparative study on modified Joel-Cohen incision versus Pfannenstiel incision for cesarean section.
    Saha SP; Bhattarcharjee N; Das Mahanta S; Naskar A; Bhattacharyya SK
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24592067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Joel-Cohen or Pfannenstiel incision at cesarean delivery: does it make a difference?
    Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Raio L; Di Naro E; Miglierina M; Agosti M; Bolis P
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2002 Nov; 81(11):1040-6. PubMed ID: 12421172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Caesarean deliveries by Pfannenstiel versus Joel-Cohen incision: A randomised controlled trial.
    Abuelghar WM; El-Bishry G; Emam LH
    J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc; 2013; 14(4):194-200. PubMed ID: 24592105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of the Joel-Cohen-based technique and the transverse Pfannenstiel for caesarean section for safety and effectiveness: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Olyaeemanesh A; Bavandpour E; Mobinizadeh M; Ashrafinia M; Bavandpour M; Nouhi M
    Med J Islam Repub Iran; 2017; 31():54. PubMed ID: 29445683
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Review of advantages of Joel-Cohen surgical abdominal incision in caesarean section: a basic science perspective.
    Karanth KL; Sathish N
    Med J Malaysia; 2010 Sep; 65(3):204-8. PubMed ID: 21939169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modified Joel-Cohen technique for caesarean delivery.
    Wallin G; Fall O
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Mar; 106(3):221-6. PubMed ID: 10426640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.
    Mathai M; Hofmeyr GJ; Mathai NE
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 May; 2013(5):CD004453. PubMed ID: 23728648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Abdominal surgical incisions for caesarean section.
    Mathai M; Hofmeyr GJ
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2007 Jan; (1):CD004453. PubMed ID: 17253508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A randomized clinical trial of two surgical techniques for cesarean section.
    Franchi M; Ghezzi F; Balestreri D; Beretta P; Maymon E; Miglierina M; Bolis PF
    Am J Perinatol; 1998; 15(10):589-94. PubMed ID: 9926882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maternal infection rates after cesarean delivery by Pfannenstiel or Joel-Cohen incision: a multicenter surveillance study.
    Dumas AM; Girard R; Ayzac L; Caillat-Vallet E; Tissot-Guerraz F; Vincent-Bouletreau A; Berland M
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):139-43. PubMed ID: 19864051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can Joel-Cohen incision and single layer reconstruction reduce cesarean section morbidity?
    Ferrari AG; Frigerio LG; Candotti G; Buscaglia M; Petrone M; Taglioretti A; Calori G
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2001 Feb; 72(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 11166746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparative evaluation of the Joel-Cohen cesarean section versus the transrectal incision].
    Le Dû R; Bernardini M; Agostini A; Mazouni C; Shojai R; Blanc B; Gamerre M; Bretelle F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2007 Sep; 36(5):447-50. PubMed ID: 17335999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between the Joel-Cohen and Pfannenstiel incisions in cesarean section.
    Stark M; Finkel AR
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1994 Feb; 53(2):121-2. PubMed ID: 8194647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Cesarean section by the Misgav Ladach+ with the abdominal opening surgery by the Joel Cohen method].
    Zienkowicz Z; Suchocki S; Sleboda H; Bojarski M
    Ginekol Pol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):284-7. PubMed ID: 10860260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison between the use of the Joel-Cohen incision and its modification during Stark's cesarean section.
    Malvasi A; Tinelli A; Serio G; Tinelli R; Casciaro S; Cavallotti C
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2007 Oct; 20(10):757-61. PubMed ID: 17763278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term outcomes of two different surgical techniques for cesarean.
    Nabhan AF
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2008 Jan; 100(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 17904561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Techniques for cesarean section.
    Hofmeyr JG; Novikova N; Mathai M; Shah A
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 201(5):431-44. PubMed ID: 19879392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparisons of the morbidity outcomes in repeated cesarean sections using midline and Pfannenstiel incisions.
    Puttanavijarn L; Phupong V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2013 Dec; 39(12):1555-9. PubMed ID: 23876084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Added value of surgical interdisciplinarity- The Joel-Cohen's abdominal incision.
    Stark M; Witzel K; Benhidjeb T; Becker S
    Ann Med Surg (Lond); 2021 Jul; 67():102455. PubMed ID: 34158931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparative Study of Postoperative Pain between Maylard Incision and Pfannenstiel Incision in Gynecologic Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Chaywiriyangkool C; Manusook S; Pongrojpaw D; Somprasit C; Bhamarapravatana K; Suwannarurk K
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Jul; 99 Suppl 4():S16-22. PubMed ID: 29916668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.