107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24592903)
1. Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.
Celikoglu M; Bayram M; Sekerci AE; Buyuk SK; Toy E
Angle Orthod; 2014 Sep; 84(5):782-7. PubMed ID: 24592903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Upper airway changes after Xbow appliance therapy evaluated with cone beam computed tomography.
Erbas B; Kocadereli I
Angle Orthod; 2014 Jul; 84(4):693-700. PubMed ID: 24328912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship of vertical skeletofacial morphology to oropharyngeal airway shape using cone beam computed tomography: possible implications for airway restriction.
Haskell JA; Haskell BS; Spoon ME; Feng C
Angle Orthod; 2014 May; 84(3):548-54. PubMed ID: 24168401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between the three-dimensional maxillomandibular complex parameters and pharyngeal airway dimensions in different sagittal and vertical malocclusions.
Al-Somairi MAA; Liu Y; Almashraq AA; Almaqrami BS; Alshoaibi LH; Alyafrusee ES; Al-Tayar B; An X; Alhammadi MS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2023 Feb; 52(3):20220346. PubMed ID: 36695712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluation of pharyngeal airway volume three-dimensionally in various sagittal skeletal patterns - Systematic review.
Rajkumar B; Parameswaran R; Sanjana M; Boovaraghavan S; Vijayalakshmi D
Indian J Dent Res; 2023; 34(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 37787215
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-dimensional mandibular characteristics in skeletal malocclusion : A cross-sectional study.
Olbrisch C; Santander P; Moser N; Klenke D; Meyer-Marcotty P; Quast A
J Orofac Orthop; 2024 Mar; 85(2):134-145. PubMed ID: 36018344
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. CBCT Analysis of Oropharynx Airway Volume.
Al-Bahrani ZM; Najm AA; Hadi FA
J Craniofac Surg; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 34(8):e816-e818. PubMed ID: 37815391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Do patients with different craniofacial patterns have differences in upper airway volume? A systematic review with network meta-analysis.
Altheer C; Papageorgiou SN; Antonarakis GS; Papadopoulou AK
Eur J Orthod; 2024 Apr; 46(2):. PubMed ID: 38526866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Soft tissue airway dimensions and craniocervical posture in subjects with different growth patterns.
Ansar J; Maheshwari S; Verma SK; Singh RK; Agarwal DK; Bhattacharya P
Angle Orthod; 2015 Jul; 85(4):604-10. PubMed ID: 25245417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharyngeal airway subdivisions in 3-dimensional analysis: Differences between anterior and posterior anatomic boundaries.
Claudino LV; Mattos CT; Caldas LD; Mota-Júnior SL; Sant'Anna EF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2023 Nov; 164(5):741-749. PubMed ID: 37565947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Assessment of maximal inspiratory and expiratory pressures in skeletal Class II patients with different growth patterns.
Rangarajan H; Ayub II; Padmanabhan S
Angle Orthod; 2024 May; 94(3):328-335. PubMed ID: 38639454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Three-dimensional computed tomography analysis of airway volume in growing class II patients treated with Frankel II appliance.
Ahmed MJ; Diar-Bakirly S; Deirs N; Hassan A; Ghoneima A
Head Face Med; 2024 Feb; 20(1):11. PubMed ID: 38365681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of three-dimensional reconstructed palatal morphology in skeletal class III subjects with different vertical patterns using cone beam computed tomography.
Huang X; Huang W; Pei T; Zhao Y; Wang Y; Gu Y; Bai X
Head Face Med; 2024 Jan; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 38281028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessment of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion patients with various vertical facial patterns: A cephalometric study in a sample of the Saudi population.
Alfawzan AA
J Orthod Sci; 2020; 9():12. PubMed ID: 33354538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Three-dimensional quantification of mandibular asymmetries in Caucasian adult patients with different sagittal and vertical skeletal patterns. A cone beam study using 3D segmentation and mirroring procedures.
España-Pamplona P; Zamora-Martinez N; Tarazona-Álvarez B; Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Paredes-Gallardo V
Head Face Med; 2023 Dec; 19(1):54. PubMed ID: 38098053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is there a relationship of nasal septum deviation with pharyngeal airway dimension and craniocervical posture?
Sadry S; Ok U; Özdaş DÖ
Cranio; 2021 Oct; ():1-9. PubMed ID: 34720059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of airway dimensions in skeletal Class I malocclusion subjects with different vertical facial patterns.
Flores-Blancas AP; Carruitero MJ; Flores-Mir C
Dental Press J Orthod; 2017; 22(6):35-42. PubMed ID: 29364377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Three-dimensional radiographic assessment of the mandibular retromolar donor site in different vertical facial growth types.
Tahchy D; Husseini B; Ghosn N; Younes R; Khoury N; Bouserhal J; Riachi F
J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2023 Dec; 124(6):101457. PubMed ID: 36972788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway changes following rapid maxillary expansion: A retrospective comparison with propensity score matched controls.
Aljawad H; Lee KM; Lim HJ
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261579. PubMed ID: 34941970
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluation of effects of a modified asymmetric rapid maxillary expansion appliance on the upper airway volume by cone beam computed tomography.
Yavan MA; Kaya S; Kervancioglu P; Kocahan S
J Dent Sci; 2021 Jan; 16(1):58-64. PubMed ID: 33384779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
