These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
449 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24593017)
1. Skin irritability to sodium lauryl sulfate is associated with increased positive patch test reactions. Schwitulla J; Brasch J; Löffler H; Schnuch A; Geier J; Uter W Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):115-23. PubMed ID: 24593017 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Simultaneous sodium lauryl sulphate testing improves the diagnostic validity of allergic patch tests. Results from a prospective multicentre study of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Löffler H; Becker D; Brasch J; Geier J; Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):709-19. PubMed ID: 15840103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The MOAHLFA index of irritant sodium lauryl sulfate reactions: first results of a multicentre study on routine sodium lauryl sulfate patch testing. Uter W; Geier J; Becker D; Brasch J; Löffler H Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):259-62. PubMed ID: 15606650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Patch testing with the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) is useful in interpreting weak reactions to contact allergens as allergic or irritant. Geier J; Uter W; Pirker C; Frosch PJ Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Feb; 48(2):99-107. PubMed ID: 12694214 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of damaged skin barrier induced by subclinical irritation on the sequential irritant contact dermatitis. Yan-yu W; Xue-min W; Yi-Mei T; Ying C; Na L Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2011 Dec; 30(4):263-71. PubMed ID: 21774626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of skin susceptibility to irritancy by routine patch testing with sodium lauryl sulfate. Löffler H; Pirker C; Aramaki J; Frosch PJ; Happle R; Effendy I Eur J Dermatol; 2001; 11(5):416-9. PubMed ID: 11525947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sequential application of cold and sodium lauryl sulphate decreases irritation and barrier disruption in vivo in humans. Fluhr JW; Bornkessel A; Akengin A; Fuchs S; Norgauer J; Kleesz P; Grieshaber R; Elsner P Br J Dermatol; 2005 Apr; 152(4):702-8. PubMed ID: 15840102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stratum corneum profiles of inflammatory mediators in patch test reactions to common contact allergens and sodium lauryl sulfate. Koppes SA; Ljubojevic Hadzavdic S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Jurakić Tončić R; Marinović B; Brans R; Gibbs S; Frings-Dresen MHW; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S Br J Dermatol; 2017 Jun; 176(6):1533-1540. PubMed ID: 28382616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Reproducibility of irritant patch test reactions to sodium lauryl sulfate in a double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study using clinical scoring. Results from a study group of the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (Deutsche Kontaktallergie-Gruppe, DKG). Brasch J; Becker D; Effendy I Contact Dermatitis; 1999 Sep; 41(3):150-5. PubMed ID: 10475514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The association between ambient air conditions (temperature and absolute humidity), irritant sodium lauryl sulfate patch test reactions and patch test reactivity to standard allergens. Uter W; Hegewald J; Pfahlberg A; Pirker C; Frosch PJ; Gefeller O Contact Dermatitis; 2003 Aug; 49(2):97-102. PubMed ID: 14641358 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Challenging a paradigm: skin sensitivity to sodium lauryl sulfate is independent of atopic diathesis. Heetfeld AB; Schill T; Schröder SS; Forkel S; Mahler V; Pfützner W; Schön MP; Geier J; Buhl T Br J Dermatol; 2020 Jul; 183(1):139-145. PubMed ID: 31562780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial disruption of skin barrier prior to irritant patch testing does not improve test design. Gebhard KL; Effendy I; Löffler H Br J Dermatol; 2004 Jan; 150(1):82-9. PubMed ID: 14746620 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irritant thresholds in subjects with colophony allergy. Smith HR; Holloway D; Armstrong DK; Basketter DA; McFadden JP Contact Dermatitis; 2000 Feb; 42(2):95-7. PubMed ID: 10703632 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can a positive photopatch test be elicited by subclinical irritancy or allergy plus suberythemal UV exposure? Beattie PE; Traynor NJ; Woods JA; Dawe RS; Ferguson J; Ibbotson SH Contact Dermatitis; 2004; 51(5-6):235-40. PubMed ID: 15606647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inflammatory skin diseases and 'danger' signalling: time to take centre stage? McFadden JP Br J Dermatol; 2014 Jul; 171(1):7-8. PubMed ID: 25066286 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Experimental irritant contact dermatitis due to cumulative epicutaneous exposure to sodium lauryl sulphate and toluene: single and concurrent application. Wigger-Alberti W; Krebs A; Elsner P Br J Dermatol; 2000 Sep; 143(3):551-6. PubMed ID: 10971328 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intra-individual variation of irritant threshold and relationship to transepidermal water loss measurement of skin irritation. Smith HR; Rowson M; Basketter DA; McFadden JP Contact Dermatitis; 2004 Jul; 51(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 15291829 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of allergens and irritants on levels of natural moisturizing factor and corneocyte morphology. Koppes SA; Ljubojević Hadžavdić S; Jakasa I; Franceschi N; Riethmüller C; Jurakić Tončic R; Marinovic B; Raj N; Rawlings AV; Voegeli R; Lane ME; Haftek M; Frings-Dresen MH; Rustemeyer T; Kezic S Contact Dermatitis; 2017 May; 76(5):287-295. PubMed ID: 28295421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Differential epidermal expression of the invariant chain in allergic and irritant contact dermatitis. Emilson A; Lindberg M; Scheynius A Acta Derm Venereol; 1998 Nov; 78(6):402-7. PubMed ID: 9833035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effect of topically applied corticosteroid on irritant and allergic patch test reactions. Green C Contact Dermatitis; 1996 Dec; 35(6):331-3. PubMed ID: 9118626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]