These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24593261)

  • 1. Comparison of single-trait and multiple-trait genomic prediction models.
    Guo G; Zhao F; Wang Y; Zhang Y; Du L; Su G
    BMC Genet; 2014 Mar; 15():30. PubMed ID: 24593261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison between genomic predictions using daughter yield deviation and conventional estimated breeding value as response variables.
    Guo G; Lund MS; Zhang Y; Su G
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2010 Dec; 127(6):423-32. PubMed ID: 21077966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction ability for beef fatty acid profile in Nelore cattle using different pseudo-phenotypes.
    Chiaia HLJ; Peripolli E; de Oliveira Silva RM; Feitosa FLB; de Lemos MVA; Berton MP; Olivieri BF; Espigolan R; Tonussi RL; Gordo DGM; de Albuquerque LG; de Oliveira HN; Ferrinho AM; Mueller LF; Kluska S; Tonhati H; Pereira ASC; Aguilar I; Baldi F
    J Appl Genet; 2018 Nov; 59(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 30251238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of number of training generations on genomic prediction for various traits in a layer chicken population.
    Weng Z; Wolc A; Shen X; Fernando RL; Dekkers JC; Arango J; Settar P; Fulton JE; O'Sullivan NP; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Mar; 48():22. PubMed ID: 26992471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A Bayesian method and its variational approximation for prediction of genomic breeding values in multiple traits.
    Hayashi T; Iwata H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():34. PubMed ID: 23363272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix.
    Tiezzi F; Maltecca C
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):24. PubMed ID: 25886167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of prediction of simulated polygenic phenotypes and their underlying quantitative trait loci genotypes using real or imputed whole-genome markers in cattle.
    Hassani S; Saatchi M; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Dec; 47():99. PubMed ID: 26698091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction.
    Wientjes YC; Veerkamp RF; Bijma P; Bovenhuis H; Schrooten C; Calus MP
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Feb; 47(1):5. PubMed ID: 25885467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantitative trait loci markers derived from whole genome sequence data increases the reliability of genomic prediction.
    Brøndum RF; Su G; Janss L; Sahana G; Guldbrandtsen B; Boichard D; Lund MS
    J Dairy Sci; 2015 Jun; 98(6):4107-16. PubMed ID: 25892697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multibreed genomic prediction using multitrait genomic residual maximum likelihood and multitask Bayesian variable selection.
    Calus MPL; Goddard ME; Wientjes YCJ; Bowman PJ; Hayes BJ
    J Dairy Sci; 2018 May; 101(5):4279-4294. PubMed ID: 29550121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of QTL minor allele frequency on genomic evaluation using real genotype data and simulated phenotypes in Japanese Black cattle.
    Uemoto Y; Sasaki S; Kojima T; Sugimoto Y; Watanabe T
    BMC Genet; 2015 Nov; 16():134. PubMed ID: 26586567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Random forest estimation of genomic breeding values for disease susceptibility over different disease incidences and genomic architectures in simulated cow calibration groups.
    Naderi S; Yin T; König S
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Sep; 99(9):7261-7273. PubMed ID: 27344385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic prediction using pooled data in a single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction framework.
    Baller JL; Kachman SD; Kuehn LA; Spangler ML
    J Anim Sci; 2020 Jun; 98(6):. PubMed ID: 32497209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of parametric, semiparametric and nonparametric methods in genomic evaluation.
    Sahebalam H; Gholizadeh M; Hafezian H; Farhadi A
    J Genet; 2019 Nov; 98():. PubMed ID: 31767821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An Integrative Genomic Prediction Approach for Predicting Buffalo Milk Traits by Incorporating Related Cattle QTLs.
    Hao X; Liang A; Plastow G; Zhang C; Wang Z; Liu J; Salzano A; Gasparrini B; Campanile G; Zhang S; Yang L
    Genes (Basel); 2022 Aug; 13(8):. PubMed ID: 36011341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An efficient unified model for genome-wide association studies and genomic selection.
    Li H; Su G; Jiang L; Bao Z
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Aug; 49(1):64. PubMed ID: 28836943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multiple-trait genomic selection methods increase genetic value prediction accuracy.
    Jia Y; Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2012 Dec; 192(4):1513-22. PubMed ID: 23086217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Genome-wide association study and genomic predictions for exterior traits in Yorkshire pigs1.
    Lee J; Lee S; Park JE; Moon SH; Choi SW; Go GW; Lim D; Kim JM
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(7):2793-2802. PubMed ID: 31087081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Within- and across-breed genomic prediction using whole-genome sequence and single nucleotide polymorphism panels.
    Iheshiulor OO; Woolliams JA; Yu X; Wellmann R; Meuwissen TH
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Feb; 48():15. PubMed ID: 26895843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.