401 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24593708)
1. Three-dimensional analysis of the respiratory interplay effect in helical tomotherapy: Baseline variations cause the greater part of dose inhomogeneities seen.
Tudor GS; Harden SV; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):031704. PubMed ID: 24593708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A motion phantom study on helical tomotherapy: the dosimetric impacts of delivery technique and motion.
Kanagaki B; Read PW; Molloy JA; Larner JM; Sheng K
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):243-55. PubMed ID: 17183139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Motion as a perturbation: measurement-guided dose estimates to moving patient voxels during modulated arc deliveries.
Feygelman V; Stambaugh C; Zhang G; Hunt D; Opp D; Wolf TK; Nelms BE
Med Phys; 2013 Feb; 40(2):021708. PubMed ID: 23387731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Experimental measurements and Monte Carlo simulations for dosimetric evaluations of intrafraction motion for gated and ungated intensity modulated arc therapy deliveries.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Staruch R; Craig J; Gaede S; Chen J; Wong E
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Nov; 53(22):6419-36. PubMed ID: 18941277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Experimental validation of the van Herk margin formula for lung radiation therapy.
Ecclestone G; Bissonnette JP; Heath E
Med Phys; 2013 Nov; 40(11):111721. PubMed ID: 24320429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Respiratory motion effects on whole breast helical tomotherapy.
Moeckly SR; Lamba M; Elson HR
Med Phys; 2008 Apr; 35(4):1464-75. PubMed ID: 18491541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the validity of density overrides for VMAT lung SBRT planning.
Wiant D; Vanderstraeten C; Maurer J; Pursley J; Terrell J; Sintay BJ
Med Phys; 2014 Aug; 41(8):081707. PubMed ID: 25086517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Impact of planned dose reporting methods on Gamma pass rates for IROC lung and liver motion phantoms treated with pencil beam scanning protons.
Kang Y; Shen J; Liu W; Taylor PA; Mehrens HS; Ding X; Hu Y; Tryggestad E; Keole SR; Schild SE; Wong WW; Fatyga M; Bues M
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Jun; 14(1):108. PubMed ID: 31208439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monte Carlo calculation of helical tomotherapy dose delivery.
Zhao YL; Mackenzie M; Kirkby C; Fallone BG
Med Phys; 2008 Aug; 35(8):3491-500. PubMed ID: 18777909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of the interplay effect when using dynamic MLC sequences to treat moving targets.
Court LE; Wagar M; Ionascu D; Berbeco R; Chin L
Med Phys; 2008 May; 35(5):1926-31. PubMed ID: 18561668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Feasibility of real-time motion management with helical tomotherapy.
Schnarr E; Beneke M; Casey D; Chao E; Chappelow J; Cox A; Henderson D; Jordan P; Lessard E; Lucas D; Myronenko A; Maurer C
Med Phys; 2018 Apr; 45(4):1329-1337. PubMed ID: 29405307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the interplay effect when using RapidArc to treat targets moving in the craniocaudal or right-left direction.
Court L; Wagar M; Berbeco R; Reisner A; Winey B; Schofield D; Ionascu D; Allen AM; Popple R; Lingos T
Med Phys; 2010 Jan; 37(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 20175460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dosimetric evaluation of the interplay effect in respiratory-gated RapidArc radiation therapy.
Riley C; Yang Y; Li T; Zhang Y; Heron DE; Huq MS
Med Phys; 2014 Jan; 41(1):011715. PubMed ID: 24387507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparing the accuracy of four-dimensional photon dose calculations with three-dimensional calculations using moving and deforming phantoms.
Vinogradskiy YY; Balter P; Followill DS; Alvarez PE; White RA; Starkschall G
Med Phys; 2009 Nov; 36(11):5000-6. PubMed ID: 19994509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dosimetric impact of breathing motion in lung stereotactic body radiotherapy treatment using intensity modulated radiotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy [corrected].
Rao M; Wu J; Cao D; Wong T; Mehta V; Shepard D; Ye J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Jun; 83(2):e251-6. PubMed ID: 22365622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of the fixed gantry angle approximation on dosimetric accuracy for helical tomotherapy plans.
Tudor GS; Thomas SJ
Med Phys; 2013 Jan; 40(1):011711. PubMed ID: 23298081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantifying the effect of intrafraction motion during breast IMRT planning and dose delivery.
George R; Keall PJ; Kini VR; Vedam SS; Siebers JV; Wu Q; Lauterbach MH; Arthur DW; Mohan R
Med Phys; 2003 Apr; 30(4):552-62. PubMed ID: 12722807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Motion induced interplay effects for VMAT radiotherapy.
Edvardsson A; Nordström F; Ceberg C; Ceberg S
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Apr; 63(8):085012. PubMed ID: 29671410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
