These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

62 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24593738)

  • 1. An analysis of the uncertainty and bias in DCE-MRI measurements using the spoiled gradient-recalled echo pulse sequence.
    Subashi E; Choudhury KR; Johnson GA
    Med Phys; 2014 Mar; 41(3):032301. PubMed ID: 24593738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Estimation of Contrast Agent Concentration in DCE-MRI Using 2 Flip Angles.
    Bharadwaj Das A; Tranos JA; Zhang J; Zaim Wadghiri Y; Kim SG
    Invest Radiol; 2022 May; 57(5):343-351. PubMed ID: 35025833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Optimizing MR Scan Design for Model-Based ${T}_{1}$ , ${T}_{2}$ Estimation From Steady-State Sequences.
    Nataraj G; Nielsen JF; Fessler JA
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2017 Feb; 36(2):467-477. PubMed ID: 27893386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quantitative contrast-enhanced MRI with superparamagnetic nanoparticles using ultrashort time-to-echo pulse sequences.
    Gharagouzloo CA; McMahon PN; Sridhar S
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Aug; 74(2):431-41. PubMed ID: 25168606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Optimal flip angles for in vivo liver 3D T
    Belsley G; Tyler DJ; Robson MD; Tunnicliffe EM
    Magn Reson Med; 2023 Sep; 90(3):950-962. PubMed ID: 37125661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal/spatial resolution improvement of in vivo DCE-MRI with compressed sensing-optimized FLASH.
    Han S; Paulsen JL; Zhu G; Song Y; Chun S; Cho G; Ackerstaff E; Koutcher JA; Cho H
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Jul; 30(6):741-52. PubMed ID: 22465192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robust estimation of hemo-dynamic parameters in traditional DCE-MRI models.
    Hansen MB; Tietze A; Haack S; Kallehauge J; Mikkelsen IK; Østergaard L; Mouridsen K
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(1):e0209891. PubMed ID: 30605459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incorporation of nonzero echo times in the SPGR and bSSFP signal models used in mcDESPOT.
    Bouhrara M; Spencer RG
    Magn Reson Med; 2015 Nov; 74(5):1227-35. PubMed ID: 26407635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Contrast-agent-based perfusion MRI code repository and testing framework: ISMRM Open Science Initiative for Perfusion Imaging (OSIPI).
    van Houdt PJ; Ragunathan S; Berks M; Ahmed Z; Kershaw LE; Gurney-Champion OJ; Tadimalla S; Arvidsson J; Sun Y; Kallehauge J; Dickie B; Lévy S; Bell L; Sourbron S; Thrippleton MJ;
    Magn Reson Med; 2024 May; 91(5):1774-1786. PubMed ID: 37667526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization of D-maltose as a T
    Goldenberg JM; Pagel MD; Cárdenas-Rodríguez J
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 Sep; 80(3):1158-1164. PubMed ID: 29369407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A theoretical framework to model DSC-MRI data acquired in the presence of contrast agent extravasation.
    Quarles CC; Gochberg DF; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Oct; 54(19):5749-66. PubMed ID: 19729712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of hepatic transporter function in rats using dynamic gadoxetate-enhanced MRI: a reproducibility study.
    Gunwhy ER; Hines CDG; Green C; Laitinen I; Tadimalla S; Hockings PD; Schütz G; Kenna JG; Sourbron S; Waterton JC
    MAGMA; 2024 Aug; 37(4):697-708. PubMed ID: 39105950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Structural and practical identifiability of contrast transport models for DCE-MRI.
    Conte M; Woodall RT; Gutova M; Chen BT; Shiroishi MS; Brown CE; Munson JM; Rockne RC
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2024 May; 20(5):e1012106. PubMed ID: 38748755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Simultaneous estimation of the cellular water exchange rate, intracellular volume fraction, and longitudinal relaxation rate in cancer cells.
    Kiser K; Zhang J; Qayyum S; Bracken WC; Kim SG
    NMR Biomed; 2023 Jul; 36(7):e4914. PubMed ID: 36889984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Optimization of MR protocols: a statistical decision analysis approach.
    McVeigh ER; Bronskill MJ; Henkelman RM
    Magn Reson Med; 1988 Mar; 6(3):314-33. PubMed ID: 3283499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of the Bias of the Initial Phase Estimation of a Sinewave of Known Frequency in the Presence of Phase Noise.
    Alegria FAC; Xie L; Pasadas D
    Sensors (Basel); 2024 Jun; 24(12):. PubMed ID: 38931514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fundamental Uncertainty: Interplatform Inconsistency of FDA-Cleared Serological Tests.
    Cervinski MA
    J Appl Lab Med; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38888191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Longitudinal assessment of quality assurance measurements in a 1.5 T MR-linac: Part II-Magnetic resonance imaging.
    Subashi E; Dresner A; Tyagi N
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jun; 23(6):e13586. PubMed ID: 35332990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging quantification of leukemia-induced changes in bone marrow vascular function.
    Gomes AL; Gribben J; Siow B; Passaro D; Bonnet D
    Haematologica; 2021 Aug; 106(8):2281-2286. PubMed ID: 33764000
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Experimental Protocols for MRI Mapping of Renal T
    Garteiser P; Bane O; Doblas S; Friedli I; Hectors S; Pagé G; Van Beers BE; Waterton JC
    Methods Mol Biol; 2021; 2216():383-402. PubMed ID: 33476012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.