409 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24593896)
1. Consideration of effect of the amount of mandibular setback on the submental region in the planning of orthodontic-orthognathic treatment.
Ghassemi M; Hilgers RD; Jamilian A; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Gerressen M; Ghassemi A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 52(4):334-9. PubMed ID: 24593896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Soft tissue profile changes after setback genioplasty in orthognathic surgery patients.
Park JY; Kim MJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 41(7):657-64. PubMed ID: 23395297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Skeletal and dental variables related to the stability of orthognathic surgery in skeletal Class III malocclusion with a surgery-first approach.
Ko EW; Lin SC; Chen YR; Huang CS
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 May; 71(5):e215-23. PubMed ID: 23455415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The stability of bilateral sagittal ramus osteotomy and vertical ramus osteotomy after bimaxillary correction of class III malocclusion.
Abeltins A; Jakobsone G; Urtane I; Bigestans A
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2011 Dec; 39(8):583-7. PubMed ID: 21334219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Long-term skeletal and profile stability after surgical-orthodontic treatment of Class II and Class III malocclusion.
de Lir Ade L; de Moura WL; Oliveira Ruellas AC; Gomes Souza MM; Nojima LI
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jun; 41(4):296-302. PubMed ID: 23196069
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Alteration of masticatory electromyographic activity and stability of orthognathic surgery in patients with skeletal class III malocclusion.
Ko EW; Huang CS; Lo LJ; Chen YR
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Jul; 71(7):1249-60. PubMed ID: 23562358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Transverse stability of the proximal segment after bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular setback surgery.
Yoo JY; Kwon YD; Suh JH; Ko SJ; Lee B; Lee JW; Kim EC; Girod S
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Aug; 42(8):994-1000. PubMed ID: 23538214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of occlusal vertical dimension changes on postsurgical skeletal changes in a surgery-first approach for skeletal Class III deformities.
Lee J; Kim YI; Hwang DS; Kim KB; Park SB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Nov; 146(5):612-9. PubMed ID: 25439212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Stability of mandibular setback surgery with and without presurgical orthodontics.
Kim CS; Lee SC; Kyung HM; Park HS; Kwon TG
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2014 Apr; 72(4):779-87. PubMed ID: 24268965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Do patients treated with bimaxillary surgery have more stable condylar positions than those who have undergone single-jaw surgery?
Kim YJ; Oh KM; Hong JS; Lee JH; Kim HM; Reyes M; Cevidanes LH; Park YH
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Sep; 70(9):2143-52. PubMed ID: 22115974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The influence of bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy on submental-cervical aesthetics.
Soydan SS; Uckan S; Ustdal A; Bayram B; Bayrak B
J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Nov; 41(11):816-21. PubMed ID: 24946129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of post-surgical relapse after mandibular setback surgery with minimal orthodontic preparation.
Lee NK; Kim YK; Yun PY; Kim JW
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2013 Jan; 41(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 22819298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A more accurate method of predicting soft tissue changes after mandibular setback surgery.
Suh HY; Lee SJ; Lee YS; Donatelli RE; Wheeler TT; Kim SH; Eo SH; Seo BM
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Oct; 70(10):e553-62. PubMed ID: 22990101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Relapse after SSRO for mandibular setback movement in relation to the amount of mandibular setback and intraoperative clockwise rotation of the proximal segment.
Han JJ; Yang HJ; Lee SJ; Hwang SJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Sep; 42(6):811-5. PubMed ID: 24411469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of minimal versus conventional presurgical orthodontics in skeletal class III patients treated with two-jaw surgery.
Joh B; Bayome M; Park JH; Park JU; Kim Y; Kook YA
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Oct; 71(10):1733-41. PubMed ID: 23932114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A retrospective analysis of the stability and relapse of soft and hard tissue change after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy for mandibular setback of 64 Taiwanese patients.
Chou JI; Fong HJ; Kuang SH; Gi LY; Hwang FY; Lai YC; Chang RC; Kao SY
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2005 Mar; 63(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 15742287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative study of skeletal stability between bicortical resorbable and titanium screw fixation after sagittal split ramus osteotomy for mandibular prognathism.
Paeng JY; Hong J; Kim CS; Kim MJ
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2012 Dec; 40(8):660-4. PubMed ID: 22209495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of maxillary advancement on the change in the soft tissues after treatment of patients with class III malocclusion.
Ghassemi M; Hilgers RD; Jamilian A; Shokatbakhsh A; Hölzle F; Fritz U; Ghassemi A
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2015 Oct; 53(8):754-9. PubMed ID: 26119699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Asymmetric mandibular prognathism: outcome, stability and patient satisfaction after BSSO surgery. A retrospective study.
Hågensli N; Stenvik A; Espeland L
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2014 Dec; 42(8):1735-41. PubMed ID: 25175078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
