132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24594459)
1. Effectiveness, usability, and acceptability of haptic-enabled virtual reality and mannequin modality simulators for surgical cricothyroidotomy.
Proctor MD; Campbell-Wynn L
Mil Med; 2014 Mar; 179(3):260-4. PubMed ID: 24594459
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Augmented versus virtual reality laparoscopic simulation: what is the difference? A comparison of the ProMIS augmented reality laparoscopic simulator versus LapSim virtual reality laparoscopic simulator.
Botden SM; Buzink SN; Schijven MP; Jakimowicz JJ
World J Surg; 2007 Apr; 31(4):764-72. PubMed ID: 17361356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A haptic-enabled simulator for cricothyroidotomy.
Liu A; Bhasin Y; Bowyer M
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():308-13. PubMed ID: 15718750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Toward technology-supported surgical training: the potential of virtual simulators in laparoscopic surgery.
Beyer-Berjot L; Aggarwal R
Scand J Surg; 2013; 102(4):221-6. PubMed ID: 24056136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Evolution of Medical Training Simulation in the U.S. Military.
Linde AS; Kunkler K
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2016; 220():209-14. PubMed ID: 27046580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Virtual reality simulation in endovascular surgical training.
Tsang JS; Naughton PA; Leong S; Hill AD; Kelly CJ; Leahy AL
Surgeon; 2008 Aug; 6(4):214-20. PubMed ID: 18697364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Repeated palpatory training of medical students on the Virtual Haptic Back.
Bajaj K; Howell JN; Conatser RR; Williams RL
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 132():8-13. PubMed ID: 18391247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Virtual reality enhanced mannequin (VREM) that is well received by resuscitation experts.
Semeraro F; Frisoli A; Bergamasco M; Cerchiari EL
Resuscitation; 2009 Apr; 80(4):489-92. PubMed ID: 19203823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of the Efficacy and Efficiency of the Use of Virtual Reality Simulation With High-Fidelity Mannequins for Simulation-Based Training of Fiberoptic Bronchoscope Manipulation.
Jiang B; Ju H; Zhao Y; Yao L; Feng Y
Simul Healthc; 2018 Apr; 13(2):83-87. PubMed ID: 29621098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. What is the minimum training required for successful cricothyroidotomy?: a study in mannequins.
Wong DT; Prabhu AJ; Coloma M; Imasogie N; Chung FF
Anesthesiology; 2003 Feb; 98(2):349-53. PubMed ID: 12552192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Systematic Review on Orthopedic Simulators for Psycho-Motor Skill and Surgical Procedure Training.
Ruikar DD; Hegadi RS; Santosh KC
J Med Syst; 2018 Aug; 42(9):168. PubMed ID: 30073548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Contemporary virtual reality laparoscopy simulators: quicksand or solid grounds for assessing surgical trainees?
Thijssen AS; Schijven MP
Am J Surg; 2010 Apr; 199(4):529-41. PubMed ID: 20080227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A hierarchical task analysis of cricothyroidotomy procedure for a virtual airway skills trainer simulator.
Demirel D; Butler KL; Halic T; Sankaranarayanan G; Spindler D; Cao C; Petrusa E; Molina M; Jones DB; De S; deMoya MA
Am J Surg; 2016 Sep; 212(3):475-84. PubMed ID: 26590044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Construct and face validity and task workload for laparoscopic camera navigation: virtual reality versus videotrainer systems at the SAGES Learning Center.
Stefanidis D; Haluck R; Pham T; Dunne JB; Reinke T; Markley S; Korndorffer JR; Arellano P; Jones DB; Scott DJ
Surg Endosc; 2007 Jul; 21(7):1158-64. PubMed ID: 17149551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The added value of virtual reality technology and force feedback for surgical training simulators.
Zhang L; Grosdemouge C; Arikatla VS; Ahn W; Sankaranarayanan G; De S; Jones D; Schwaitzberg S; Cao CG
Work; 2012; 41 Suppl 1():2288-92. PubMed ID: 22317056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The role of haptic feedback in laparoscopic simulation training.
Panait L; Akkary E; Bell RL; Roberts KE; Dudrick SJ; Duffy AJ
J Surg Res; 2009 Oct; 156(2):312-6. PubMed ID: 19631336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. BodyWindows: enhancing a mannequin with projective augmented reality for exploring anatomy, physiology and medical procedures.
Samosky JT; Wang B; Nelson DA; Bregman R; Hosmer A; Weaver RA
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2012; 173():433-9. PubMed ID: 22357032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [New training tools in haemovigilance].
Péan D; Brisard L; Loutrel O; Lejus C
Transfus Clin Biol; 2012 Nov; 19(4-5):249-52. PubMed ID: 23039962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Haptic, Physical, and Web-Based Simulators: Are They Underused in Maxillofacial Surgery Training?
Maliha SG; Diaz-Siso JR; Plana NM; Torroni A; Flores RL
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2018 Nov; 76(11):2424.e1-2424.e11. PubMed ID: 30081008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Simulation training in surgical education - application of virtual reality laparoscopic simulators in a surgical skills course].
Lehmann KS; Gröne J; Lauscher JC; Ritz JP; Holmer C; Pohlen U; Buhr HJ
Zentralbl Chir; 2012 Apr; 137(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 22495487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
