384 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24594701)
21. Longitudinal training dams mitigate effects of shipping on environmental conditions and fish density in the littoral zones of the river Rhine.
Collas FPL; Buijse AD; van den Heuvel L; van Kessel N; Schoor MM; Eerden H; Leuven RSEW
Sci Total Environ; 2018 Apr; 619-620():1183-1193. PubMed ID: 29734597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Prioritizing native migratory fish passage restoration while limiting the spread of invasive species: A case study in the Upper Mississippi River.
Cooper AR; Infante DM; O'Hanley JR; Yu H; Neeson TM; Brumm KJ
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Oct; 791():148317. PubMed ID: 34412399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Impacts of water resources development on flow regimes in the Brazos River.
Vogl AL; Lopes VL
Environ Monit Assess; 2009 Oct; 157(1-4):331-45. PubMed ID: 18819012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reductions in fish-community contamination following lowhead dam removal linked more to shifts in food-web structure than sediment pollution.
Davis RP; Sullivan SMP; Stefanik KC
Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):671-680. PubMed ID: 28850935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Fish biodiversity declines with dam development in the Lower Mekong Basin.
Sor R; Ngor PB; Lek S; Chann K; Khoeun R; Chandra S; Hogan ZS; Null SE
Sci Rep; 2023 May; 13(1):8571. PubMed ID: 37237013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Is it safe to remove a dam at the risk of a sprawl by exotic fish species?
Terêncio DPS; Pacheco FAL; Sanches Fernandes LF; Cortes RMV
Sci Total Environ; 2021 Jun; 771():144768. PubMed ID: 33524681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does large dam removal restore downstream riparian vegetation diversity? Testing predictions on the Elwha River, Washington, USA.
Brown RL; Thomas CC; Cubley ES; Clausen AJ; Shafroth PB
Ecol Appl; 2022 Sep; 32(6):e2591. PubMed ID: 35343023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Characterization of benthic communities and physical habitat in the Stanislaus, Tuolumne, and Merced Rivers, California.
Hall LW; Killen WD; Anderson RD
Environ Monit Assess; 2006 Apr; 115(1-3):223-64. PubMed ID: 16648958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Effects of cascading hydropower dams operation on the structure and distribution pattern of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in Manwan Reservoir, Southwest China].
Li JP; Dong SK; Peng MC; Wu X; Zhou F; Yu Y
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2017 Dec; 28(12):4101-4108. PubMed ID: 29696908
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Modeling the costs and benefits of dam construction from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Brown PH; Tullos D; Tilt B; Magee D; Wolf AT
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90 Suppl 3():S303-11. PubMed ID: 18995948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Assessing the natural and anthropogenic influences on basin-wide fish species richness.
Cheng ST; Herricks EE; Tsai WP; Chang FJ
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Dec; 572():825-836. PubMed ID: 27592326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Managing water to protect fish: a review of California's Environmental Water Account, 2001-2005.
Brown LR; Kimmerer W; Brown R
Environ Manage; 2009 Feb; 43(2):357-68. PubMed ID: 18830738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river.
Burke M; Jorde K; Buffington JM
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90 Suppl 3():S224-36. PubMed ID: 18990483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs.
McManamay RA; Brewer SK; Jager HI; Troia MJ
Environ Manage; 2016 Sep; 58(3):365-85. PubMed ID: 27344163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Water quality modeling to determine minimum instream flow for fish survival in tidal rivers.
Liu WC; Liu SY; Hsu MH; Kuo AY
J Environ Manage; 2005 Sep; 76(4):293-308. PubMed ID: 15927355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hydropower and sustainability: resilience and vulnerability in China's powersheds.
McNally A; Magee D; Wolf AT
J Environ Manage; 2009 Jul; 90 Suppl 3():S286-93. PubMed ID: 19013007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A micro case study of the legal and administrative arrangements for river health in the Kangaroo River (NSW).
Mooney C; Farrier D
Water Sci Technol; 2002; 45(11):161-8. PubMed ID: 12171348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Linking bait and feeding opportunities to fish foraging habitat for the assessment of environmental flows and river restoration.
Zhang P; Li K; Liu Q; Liu R; Qin L; Wang H; Zhang Z; Wang K; Wang Y; Liang R; Zhu Z
Sci Total Environ; 2021 May; 768():144580. PubMed ID: 33736339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Potential impacts of climate change on flow regime and fish habitat in mountain rivers of the south-western Balkans.
Papadaki C; Soulis K; Muñoz-Mas R; Martinez-Capel F; Zogaris S; Ntoanidis L; Dimitriou E
Sci Total Environ; 2016 Jan; 540():418-28. PubMed ID: 26250864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Fish assemblage response to a small dam removal in the Eightmile River system, Connecticut, USA.
Poulos HM; Miller KE; Kraczkowski ML; Welchel AW; Heineman R; Chernoff B
Environ Manage; 2014 Nov; 54(5):1090-101. PubMed ID: 25022888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
