These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24594872)
1. The relationship between the JobMatchTalent test and the NEO PI-R: construct validation of an instrument designed for recruitment of personnel. Garcia D; Nima AA; Rappe C; Rapp Ricciardi M; Archer T PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90309. PubMed ID: 24594872 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Validation of the French version of the 10-item Big Five Inventory]. Courtois R; Petot JM; Plaisant O; Allibe B; Lignier B; Réveillère C; Lecocq G; John O Encephale; 2020 Dec; 46(6):455-462. PubMed ID: 32331765 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?]. Courtois R; Petot JM; Lignier B; Lecocq G; Plaisant O Encephale; 2018 Jun; 44(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 28364967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Revised NEO Personality Inventory normative data for police officer selection. Detrick P; Chibnall JT Psychol Serv; 2013 Nov; 10(4):372-7. PubMed ID: 23398091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Short-term stability of NEO-PI-R personality trait scores in opioid-dependent outpatients. Carter JA; Herbst JH; Stoller KB; King VL; Kidorf MS; Costa PT; Brooner RK Psychol Addict Behav; 2001 Sep; 15(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 11563805 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Borderline and avoidant personality disorders and the five-factor model of personality: a comparison between DSM-IV diagnoses and NEO-PI-R. Wilberg T; Urnes O; Friis S; Pedersen G; Karterud S J Pers Disord; 1999; 13(3):226-40. PubMed ID: 10498036 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Swedish Universities Scales of Personality: Relation to Other Personality Instruments. Fagerberg T; Söderman E; Gustavsson JP; Agartz I; G Jönsson E Psychiatry Investig; 2021 May; 18(5):373-384. PubMed ID: 33910329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: a meta-analytic validity competition. McAbee ST; Oswald FL Psychol Assess; 2013 Jun; 25(2):532-44. PubMed ID: 23397931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100. Weiss A; Costa PT Psychosom Med; 2005; 67(5):724-33. PubMed ID: 16204430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Nineteen-month stability of Revised NEO Personality Inventory domain and facet scores in patients with personality disorders. Wilberg T; Karterud S; Pedersen G; Urnes Ø; Costa PT J Nerv Ment Dis; 2009 Mar; 197(3):187-95. PubMed ID: 19282686 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Rotation to Maximize the Construct Validity of Factors in the NEO Personality Inventory. McCrae RR; Costa PT Multivariate Behav Res; 1989 Jan; 24(1):107-24. PubMed ID: 26794299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A psychometric evaluation of the new NEO-PIR facet scales for agreeableness and conscientiousness. Piedmont RL; Weinstein HP J Pers Assess; 1993 Apr; 60(2):302-18. PubMed ID: 16370832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of response sets on NEO-PI-R scores and their relations to external criteria. Caldwell-Andrews A; Baer RA; Berry DT J Pers Assess; 2000 Jun; 74(3):472-88. PubMed ID: 10900573 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Internal and temporal reliability estimates for informant ratings of personality using the NEO PI-R and IAS. NEO Personality Inventory. Interpersonal Adjective Scales. Kurtz JE; Lee PA; Sherker JL Assessment; 1999 Jun; 6(2):103-13. PubMed ID: 10335016 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The utility of the NEO-PI-R validity scales to detect response distortion: a comparison with the MMPI-2. Morasco BJ; Gfeller JD; Elder KA J Pers Assess; 2007 Jun; 88(3):276-83. PubMed ID: 17518549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Personality traits measured by the Swedish universities Scales of Personality: factor structure and position within the five-factor model in an Estonian sample. Aluoja A; Voogne H; Maron E; Gustavsson JP; Võhma U; Shlik J Nord J Psychiatry; 2009; 63(3):231-6. PubMed ID: 19034803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Demand effects on positive response distortion by police officer applicants on the Revised NEO Personality Inventory. Detrick P; Chibnall JT; Call C J Pers Assess; 2010 Sep; 92(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 20706927 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A study of affective temperaments in Hungary: internal consistency and concurrent validity of the TEMPS-A against the TCI and NEO-PI-R. Rózsa S; Rihmer Z; Gonda X; Szili I; Rihmer A; Ko N; Németh A; Pestality P; Bagdy G; Alhassoon O; Akiskal KK; Akiskal HS J Affect Disord; 2008 Feb; 106(1-2):45-53. PubMed ID: 17706791 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Higher- and lower-order personality traits and cluster subtypes in social anxiety disorder. Costache ME; Frick A; Månsson K; Engman J; Faria V; Hjorth O; Hoppe JM; Gingnell M; Frans Ö; Björkstrand J; Rosén J; Alaie I; Åhs F; Linnman C; Wahlstedt K; Tillfors M; Marteinsdottir I; Fredrikson M; Furmark T PLoS One; 2020; 15(4):e0232187. PubMed ID: 32348331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evaluating Circumplex Structure in the Interpersonal Scales for the NEO-PI-3. Louie JF; Kurtz JE; Markey PM Assessment; 2018 Jul; 25(5):589-595. PubMed ID: 27572227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]