105 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24594875)
1. Use of articulated registration for response assessment of individual metastatic bone lesions.
Yip S; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1501-14. PubMed ID: 24594875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Development and evaluation of an articulated registration algorithm for human skeleton registration.
Yip S; Perk T; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Mar; 59(6):1485-99. PubMed ID: 24594843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sensitivity study of voxel-based PET image comparison to image registration algorithms.
Yip S; Chen AB; Aerts HJ; Berbeco R
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):111714. PubMed ID: 25370628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Automated classification of benign and malignant lesions in
Perk T; Bradshaw T; Chen S; Im HJ; Cho S; Perlman S; Liu G; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(22):225019. PubMed ID: 30457118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Development and validation of a longitudinal soft-tissue metastatic lesion matching algorithm.
Santoro-Fernandes V; Huff D; Scarpelli ML; Perk TG; Albertini MR; Perlman S; Yip SSF; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Jul; 66(15):. PubMed ID: 34261045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Performance of whole-body integrated 18F-FDG PET/MR in comparison to PET/CT for evaluation of malignant bone lesions.
Eiber M; Takei T; Souvatzoglou M; Mayerhoefer ME; Fürst S; Gaertner FC; Loeffelbein DJ; Rummeny EJ; Ziegler SI; Schwaiger M; Beer AJ
J Nucl Med; 2014 Feb; 55(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 24309383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Propagation of target and organ at risk contours in radiotherapy of prostate cancer using deformable image registration.
Thörnqvist S; Petersen JB; Høyer M; Bentzen LN; Muren LP
Acta Oncol; 2010 Oct; 49(7):1023-32. PubMed ID: 20831491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI compared with (18)F-NaF PET/CT for detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate carcinoma.
Mosavi F; Johansson S; Sandberg DT; Turesson I; Sörensen J; Ahlström H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Nov; 199(5):1114-20. PubMed ID: 23096187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Nonrigid versus rigid registration of thoracic 18F-FDG PET and CT in patients with lung cancer: an intraindividual comparison of different breathing maneuvers.
Grgic A; Nestle U; Schaefer-Schuler A; Kremp S; Ballek E; Fleckenstein J; Rübe C; Kirsch CM; Hellwig D
J Nucl Med; 2009 Dec; 50(12):1921-6. PubMed ID: 19910420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners.
Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B
J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of segmentation-based attenuation correction methods for PET/MRI: evaluation of bone and liver standardized uptake value with oncologic PET/CT data.
Kim JH; Lee JS; Song IC; Lee DS
J Nucl Med; 2012 Dec; 53(12):1878-82. PubMed ID: 23081993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Molecular image-directed biopsies: improving clinical biopsy selection in patients with multiple tumors.
Harmon SA; Tuite MJ; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(20):7282-7299. PubMed ID: 27694707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A statistically optimized regional thresholding method (SORT) for bone lesion detection in
Perk T; Chen S; Harmon S; Lin C; Bradshaw T; Perlman S; Liu G; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Nov; 63(22):225018. PubMed ID: 30457117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI-based attenuation correction for whole-body PET/MRI: quantitative evaluation of segmentation- and atlas-based methods.
Hofmann M; Bezrukov I; Mantlik F; Aschoff P; Steinke F; Beyer T; Pichler BJ; Schölkopf B
J Nucl Med; 2011 Sep; 52(9):1392-9. PubMed ID: 21828115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An automated methodology for whole-body, multimodality tracking of individual cancer lesions.
Santoro-Fernandes V; Huff DT; Rivetti L; Deatsch A; Schott B; Perlman SB; Jeraj R
Phys Med Biol; 2024 Apr; 69(8):. PubMed ID: 38457838
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The detection of bone metastases in patients with high-risk prostate cancer: 99mTc-MDP Planar bone scintigraphy, single- and multi-field-of-view SPECT, 18F-fluoride PET, and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Mishani E; Lievshitz G; Lerman H; Leibovitch I
J Nucl Med; 2006 Feb; 47(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 16455635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robust inverse-consistent affine CT-MR registration in MRI-assisted and MRI-alone prostate radiation therapy.
Rivest-Hénault D; Dowson N; Greer PB; Fripp J; Dowling JA
Med Image Anal; 2015 Jul; 23(1):56-69. PubMed ID: 25966468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of malignant skeletal disease: initial experience with 18F-fluoride PET/CT and comparison between 18F-fluoride PET and 18F-fluoride PET/CT.
Even-Sapir E; Metser U; Flusser G; Zuriel L; Kollender Y; Lerman H; Lievshitz G; Ron I; Mishani E
J Nucl Med; 2004 Feb; 45(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 14960647
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diagnostic accuracy of 18F choline PET/CT using time-of-flight reconstruction algorithm in prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence.
Hausmann D; Bittencourt LK; Attenberger UI; Sertdemir M; Weidner A; Büsing KA; Brade J; Wenz F; Schoenberg SO; Dinter DJ
Clin Nucl Med; 2014 Mar; 39(3):e197-201. PubMed ID: 24092230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of rigid and non-rigid image registration on test-retest variability of quantitative [18F]FDG PET/CT studies.
van Velden FH; van Beers P; Nuyts J; Velasquez LM; Hayes W; Lammertsma AA; Boellaard R; Loeckx D
EJNMMI Res; 2012 Mar; 2(1):10. PubMed ID: 22404895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
