387 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24595253)
1. Transradial approach versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and coronary angioplasty.
Mullin MK
Crit Care Nurs Q; 2014; 37(2):159-69. PubMed ID: 24595253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A randomized comparison of transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty.
Brueck M; Bandorski D; Kramer W; Wieczorek M; Höltgen R; Tillmanns H
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1047-54. PubMed ID: 19926042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Repeated transradial catheterization: feasibility, efficacy, and safety.
Charalambous MA; Constantinides SS; Talias MA; Soteriades ES; Christou CP
Tex Heart Inst J; 2014 Dec; 41(6):575-8. PubMed ID: 25593518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cardiac catheterization on the road less traveled: navigating the radial versus femoral debate.
Kern MJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2009 Nov; 2(11):1055-6. PubMed ID: 19926043
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. The efficacy and safety of transradial approach in comparison with transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and ad hoc coronary angioplasty in Thailand.
Sansanayudh N; Champasri K; Piamsomboon C; Sanguanwong S; Narksawasdee C; Tengtrakulcharoen P; Laotavorn P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2010 Nov; 93 Suppl 6():S145-51. PubMed ID: 21280527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and angioplasty - A prospective, randomized comparison.
Bhat FA; Changal KH; Raina H; Tramboo NA; Rather HA
BMC Cardiovasc Disord; 2017 Jan; 17(1):23. PubMed ID: 28077091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized comparison of the transradial and transfemoral approaches for coronary artery bypass graft angiography and intervention: the RADIAL-CABG Trial (RADIAL Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Angiography and Intervention).
Michael TT; Alomar M; Papayannis A; Mogabgab O; Patel VG; Rangan BV; Luna M; Hastings JL; Grodin J; Abdullah S; Banerjee S; Brilakis ES
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Nov; 6(11):1138-44. PubMed ID: 24139930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Troubleshooting in transradial intervention.
Spence MS; Byrne J; Hilton D
Indian Heart J; 2008; 60(1 Suppl A):A54-9. PubMed ID: 19359751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of frequency of radial artery occlusion after 4Fr versus 6Fr transradial coronary intervention (from the Novel Angioplasty USIng Coronary Accessor Trial).
Takeshita S; Asano H; Hata T; Hibi K; Ikari Y; Kan Y; Katsuki T; Kawasaki T; Masutani M; Matsumura T; Premchand RK; Rao SP; Suzuki T; Takahashi A; Takeda R; Tanaka S; Yamazaki S; Yin WH; Yoshimachi F; Saito S;
Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(12):1986-9. PubMed ID: 24786357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 5-Fr sheathless transradial cardiac catheterization using conventional catheters and balloon assisted tracking; a new approach to downsizing.
Mamas MA; George S; Ratib K; Kwok CS; Elkhazin A; Sandhu K; Stubbs J; Luxford P; Nolan J
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2017; 18(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 27707595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. From Femoral to Radial Approach in Coronary Intervention.
Bianchi R; D'Acierno L; Crisci M; Tartaglione D; Cappelli Bigazzi M; Canonico M; Albanese M; Gragnano F; Fimiani F; Russo M; Cirillo P; Calabrò P
Angiology; 2017 Apr; 68(4):281-287. PubMed ID: 27401210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transulnar artery approach for percutaneous coronary intervention: an alternative route in a patient with challenging transfemoral access and hypoplastic radial artery.
Chiam PT; Lim VY
Singapore Med J; 2010 May; 51(5):e81-4. PubMed ID: 20593134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for coronary angiography and intervention in patients above 75 years of age.
Achenbach S; Ropers D; Kallert L; Turan N; Krähner R; Wolf T; Garlichs C; Flachskampf F; Daniel WG; Ludwig J
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2008 Nov; 72(5):629-35. PubMed ID: 18798237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Radial vs. femoral approach for primary percutaneous coronary intervention in octogenarians.
Koutouzis M; Matejka G; Olivecrona G; Grip L; Albertsson P
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2010; 11(2):79-83. PubMed ID: 20347796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of transradial coronary catheterization on upper limb function.
van Leeuwen MA; van Mieghem NM; Lenzen MJ; Selles RW; Hoefkens MF; Zijlstra F; van Royen N
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2015 Apr; 8(4):515-23. PubMed ID: 25819177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Low rate of conversion to transfemoral approach when attempting both radial arteries for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention: a study of 1,826 consecutive procedures.
Guédès A; Dangoisse V; Gabriel L; Jamart J; Chenu P; Marchandise B; Schroeder E
J Invasive Cardiol; 2010 Sep; 22(9):391-7. PubMed ID: 20814043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Transradial arterial access for coronary and peripheral procedures: executive summary by the Transradial Committee of the SCAI.
Caputo RP; Tremmel JA; Rao S; Gilchrist IC; Pyne C; Pancholy S; Frasier D; Gulati R; Skelding K; Bertrand O; Patel T
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2011 Nov; 78(6):823-39. PubMed ID: 21544927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transradial approach to all interventional procedures a matter of the learning curve.
Pawlowski T; Kulawik T; Gil RJ
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Apr; 3(4):463; author reply 463-4. PubMed ID: 20398879
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Radial versus femoral access for rescue percutaneous coronary intervention with adjuvant glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor use.
Kassam S; Cantor WJ; Patel D; Gilchrist IC; Winegard LD; Rea ME; Bowman KA; Chisholm RJ; Strauss BH
Can J Cardiol; 2004 Dec; 20(14):1439-42. PubMed ID: 15614338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radial versus femoral access for orally anticoagulated patients.
Ziakas AG; Koskinas KC; Gavrilidis S; Giannoglou GD; Hadjimiltiades S; Gourassas I; Theofilogiannakos E; Economou F; Styliadis I
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Oct; 76(4):493-9. PubMed ID: 20882651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
